:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/22555407/186601589.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
USC 31, Oregon State 14 |
||||||
| USC | OSU | USC | OSU | |||
| Close % | 75.4% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 27.7% | 34.4% | Success Rate | 58.8% | 46.2% | |
| Leverage % | 65.4% | 60.5% | PPP | 0.88 | 0.69 | |
| S&P | 1.470 | 1.154 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 44.5 | 33.2 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 50.0% | 37.2% | Success Rate | 33.3% | 23.5% | |
| Close PPP | 0.80 | 0.53 | PPP | 0.64 | 0.29 | |
| Close S&P | 1.298 | 0.905 | S&P | 0.973 | 0.525 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 22.5 | 10.0 | Number | 1 | 3 | |
| Close Success Rate | 51.6% | 60.0% | Turnover Pts | 7.4 | 15.9 | |
| Close PPP | 0.64 | 0.71 | Turnover Pts Margin | +8.5 | -8.5 | |
| Close S&P | 1.157 | 1.310 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 3.67 | 4.18 | Q1 S&P | 1.676 | 0.585 | |
| Q2 S&P | 0.871 | 1.099 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.468 | 0.971 | |||
| EqPts | 22.1 | 23.2 | Q4 S&P | 0.617 | 0.963 | |
| Close Success Rate | 47.6% | 30.3% | ||||
| Close PPP | 1.03 | 0.48 | 1st Down S&P | 1.478 | 1.032 | |
| Close S&P | 1.508 | 0.783 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.897 | 0.648 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 13.3% | 10.0% / 9.1% | 3rd Down S&P | 0.842 | 0.723 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: USC +19.8 | Actual Pt. Margin: USC +17 | ||||||
3 Thoughts...
1. For a team that doesn't run the ball well, Oregon State had some success on the ground against the USC defense.
2. USC 's offense was outstanding on 1st down. There was some drop-off in performance on 2nd and 3rd downs but USC still executed at an above average level.
3. The Trojan pass defense was flat out dominant. Holding Oregon State to a success rate of 30% on pass plays and 23% on passing downs is Alabama-esque (I know, not a word).