Conquest Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

Sanchez Named Starter

No real surprise here.

From Gary Klein at the LAT:

Offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian made it official before practice when he met with Sanchez, Mitch Mustain and Aaron Corp individually and told them that Sanchez, the fourth-year junior, was the No. 1 quarterback.

"He said, 'I just want to give you a little forewarning: You're it, man. You're the guy. You've proven it and we believe in you,' " Sanchez said, grinning.

Sanchez entered spring practice as the front-runner for the job after starting three games last season. He struggled at times through the first two weeks but asserted himself in workouts leading up to last Saturday's scrimmage.

"At this point, for the good of our football team I like where we're at with Mark," Sarkisian said.

So does Coach Pete Carroll.

"The advantage that Mark has had by being around . . . just gives him a decisive advantage and he was able to come out here and battle and throw the ball well and play with confidence and give himself the spot," Carroll said.

Maybe I am reading a bit too much into this but I am not sure what Sarkisian means when he says "for the good of our football team I like where we're at with Mark". I would agree that a should be named by the end of spring practice and I would also say that this was a foregone conclusion anyway so there is no real shock value here. But that statement almost makes it sound as if the team was going to mutiny if they didn't name Sanchez the starter soon. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding what he is trying to say.

As I noted earlier to a lot of us this is hardly a surprise. And as many have noted here on CC his experience within the system was probably the deciding factor. But I think there are a lot more questions about how Sanchez will do as the starter than there were with either Leinart or Booty.

So what does this mean for Mustain?

From The DN:

Mustain seemed to be taken a bit off-guard by the earlier-than-expected announcement, but said he did not regret transferring to USC from Arkansas.

"I want to play at a big-time place and I feel I can. USC is one of the biggest," Mustain said.

"I feel the benefits, if you get the job, would far outweigh (the negatives). I'll always feel it was the best place."

Mustain made it clear he did not believe Carroll's decision was final, though he was also confused about what it meant exactly. He spoke to the coaches after practice so he could understand the timing of the decision more.

"I don't think (the competition) is closed. We've got a lot of time," Mustain said.

"I feel like I've done everything I could. They were fairly set on a decision at the end of spring."

I think this decision was made for continuity reasons than anything else.

With this now out of the way Sanchez now needs to move into a leadership position on the offense. There are still some real questions about how he will do as the starter. With tough games against UVA and Ohio State to start off the season he will be tested right out the gate. His decision making process is going to be tested, and we all saw just how bad the results can be when he forces plays. I still see SC losing two games this season with the questions they have on the offensive line while Sanchez fits in to his role. The Pac 10 is going to be tough this year so the offense will have their work cut out for them.

I think we will get a clearer picture when Fall ball starts.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

question Paragon
     You made the comment that there are a lot more questions about how Sanchez will do as a starter than there were with Leinart (agree) or Booty.  My question is this, if memory serves me well, I remember watching Booty during the 2005 season when he got mop up time against opponents as our 2nd string QB(of which there was a decent amount since SC had a lot of blow-outs that year).  As I recall, I remember that he looked downright awful in most appearences.  At no time was I impressed with anything he did. I remember repeatedly cringing in fact at the thought of this guy being the QB the following year.  As I recall, he had something like 3 TDs and 2 INT that year.  Certainly nothing to brag about.  Then the following spring he sits out due to back surgery, then in the fall, as I recall, (and please correct me if I'm wrong because I didn't look it up) but didn't Sanchez have superior stats to Booty in Fall camp?  And despite all that, Booty was still named the starter.  My only point in saying all this is that I had a shit load of questions about Booty going into the 2006 season.  And although he might not have had the pantheon career at SC that most unrealistic fans expect, he still had a pretty superb career.

     I agree that Sanchez is still very much a work in progress and he obviously will need to improve his split second decision making skills if he plans to take SC to the promised land, but for me personally, I am far more confident in Sanchez going into the 2008 season than I was with Booty going into 2006.

     For one, Sanchez played in an absolute pressure cooker of a game in Oregon last year and I think that experience will serve him well.  Booty did not have that kind of experience going into his starting year.  Secondly although Sanchez certainly has been erratic at times, he has also showed definite flashes of brilliance.  Everyone likes to harp on Sanchez for that INT he forced at the end of the Oregon game, but everyone seems to also forget the SC drive before that one where Sanchez absolutely stormed down the field with precison strike after precision strike, and connected with Ausberry with one of the most beautiful TD passes I have ever seen.

     Maybe I'm being a little too optimistic about this, but I think as long as Sanchez can put everything together, we'll be okay.  I DO have concerns like everyone else, but I'm feeling a lot better about this than I did with Booty and we certainly came out okay the last time around.  

Go Trojans!  

by RCollier27 on Apr 16, 2008 11:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's a fair question
Couple of thoughts.

Mop up time for any QB, at least to me, really doesn't paint a clear picture. So it really isn't fair to use that as a marker. The other team usually isn't playing to their top ability because they are already out of it and the mop-up QB may try a little too hard to make some noise to make a name for himself. So I won't use that as a barometer.

Sanchez started three games last season, two games against weak teams (ND, UA) and one game against a real good team (UO). He was spotty in the UA game, his first start, so I guess you can write that off. Against ND he played above average but I mean it was against ND and then there was UO. Yes he had them in a position to win and I can't blame the fumble on him but some of his decision-making (read gunslinger mentality) has him forcing things.

Booty and Leinart really didn't have any competition when they took control of the team and they were seen as the clear-cut favorites. They also had some awesome playmakers on offense so some of the pressure is removed for them to consistently be the hero. Sanchez had Mustain pushing him so we as fans really wanted to see an open competition that went all the way through to the end before a decision was made. to your question about MS being better than JDB that just reinforces that the competition wasn't open. That's fine but just say it and move forward.

Sanchez is going to have really fire this team up and get them to perform. That's an area where I think Mustain has the advantage, as he has already done it. There is no question Sanchez has the physical talent, you noted the drive against Oregon and that was pretty good, I am just not sure that his head is there yet.

 I have faith that he can lead this team, though it would have been nice to see a little more competition between the two before Sanchez was named. In the end I really don't care who runs the offense as long as we win.

by Paragon SC on Apr 16, 2008 2:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Biased Compitition
This kid Mustain started 8 games for Arkansas, won the 8 games playing against some of the toughest schools in Div-lA.

He doesn't have the system down good enough we're told, yet he has more game experience than Sanchez, but has to play back up to Sanchez. So tell me, just how complicated is SC's offensive scheme, more so than Florida, Auburn,Texas,Georgia or Arkansas, I don't think so.

There's more to this than meets the eye. This kid is getting blind sided by a false sense of seniority. Sanchez got most of the first team snaps, how is that fair?

Mitch is a redshirt sophomore, if he plays behind Sanchez for two years he will have one year to play, not to mention Matt Barkley arriving next year. With that, he may never play.

He needs to finish the semester, pack his stuff and find a college that wants a quality quarterback.

by alfa1 on Apr 16, 2008 2:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Game experience yes, different system also
Who cares about Florida, Auburn, et al... and who knows how different the USC and Arkansas offensive systems are?

Imagine having a class with a professor for a year and then preparing for a final exam... then imagine you studied the same subject, under a different professor, and have to take the other professor's test... you don't think you're going to be better prepared for your own professor's exam? The point is that Sanchez has had an extra year in the USC system, which HAS to help him.  

by Defender90 on Apr 16, 2008 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Conclusions?????
My real point in bringing up this conjecture is simply that while Carrol prides himself on the notion that his program is an athletic meritocracy where players EARN their playing time and seniority has no bearing, I really don't think that same philosophy applies to the quarterback situation.  For whatever reason it seems like Carrol as it concerns the quarterback, has a slightly tilted playing field that prefers the incumbent player who has been in the program longer.  I mean how else do you explain Booty getting the starting job in '06 when he had just come off surgery and from all reports was outplayed by a fair margin in fall camp?

Believe me, I'm with you Paragon in that I too would like Mustain to get a more balanced look in the evaluation process.  Let the best man win regardless of age. Unfortunately it doesn't look like it's going to play out that way. (With that said, I do think that Mustain's 8-0 record as a starter is a little inflated.  The competition in those games were against some definite cream puffs and Mustain's numbers were quite mediocre, something like 10 TDs versus 8 INTs.  I remember watching a couple of those games and it seems most of the playcalls were of the "Drop back, hand off to Mcfadden/Felix.  Repeat" variety. Not terribly complicated.  Still, I do think Mustain has a ton of potential and I'd hate to see him lost in the shuffle.)    

by RCollier27 on Apr 16, 2008 4:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Trojans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Sponsors

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Michigan State's Kalin Lucas holds his left ankle as coach Tom Izzo checks on him after Lucas was injured in the first half of an NCAA second-round college basketball tournament game against Maryland in Spokane, Wash., Sunday, March 21, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose)

Tom Izzo: '85% Chance' Kalin Lucas Tore Left Achilles' Tendon

Duke's Brian Zoubek, left, and  Miles Plumlee congratulate Kyle Singler after defeating California 68-53 during an NCAA second-round college basketball game in Jacksonville, Fla., Sunday, March 21, 2010.   (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Duke Controls Cal From Start To Finish, Advances To Sweet 16

Purdue's JaJuan Johnson celebrates with the Purdue mascot's hammer after Purdue beat Texas A&M 63-61 in overtime in an NCAA second-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Sunday, March 21, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose) +1 updates

Purdue Rallies In Second Half, Edges Texas A&M In Overtime

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

4759_114276103488_551713488_1998274_134838_n_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan

Official Partner of CBS Sports