Conquest Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Why Good Athletic Directors Are Critically Important: Dan Guerrero vs Barbara Hedges

There's no doubt that a good Athletic Director sets the tone for a university's sports programs, and how they are perceived in the broader community. By all accounts, Dan Guerrero is a good athletic director, concerned about both running a clean shop and also setting up UCLA's teams to be successful on the field.

Judging by recent stories in the Seattle Times, he'll need to be vigilant so as to avoid having his work cut out for him.

Coach Rohrshach

When Neuheisel was hired, some looked at it as a declaration that winning was more important that a clean program, and some questioned the wisdom of the hire purely on the numbers: while Neuheisel's overall record was impressive, the year-on-year records showed steady worsening of results. UCLA alumni have countered with a variety of arguments (the charges were picayune, Neuheisel's win against UW for wrongful dismissal exonerates him, etc. ) which have various levels of merit. No surprise, people look at Neuheisel and see something based on themselves.

The general mood here on Conquest Chronicles was that the man can coach, but it's not clear that his recruiting (NCAA compliant or not) is as good as advertised. But we're also inclined to think that Neueheisel's a smart guy and has learned his lesson, that he brings real commitment to the job, and that he's serious about putting together a winning team for the bruins.

Go-along, get-along, away from problems

Nonetheless, it's hard not to raise an eyebrow or two at the series in the Seattle Times about the generally lax culture around the University of Washington and Neuheisel's Rose Bowl winning team. The problems of players being shielded from the law was in no way solely attributable to Neuheisel - the AD, Barbara Hedges, and local law enforcement were in many ways more influential in making this happen. However, when faced with a player, Jerramy Stevens, against whom rape accusations had been filed, Neuheisel was part of the problem. Despite evidence that made a charge credible, including patterns of violence and sexual misconduct, no charges were filed against Stevens and no action was taken at UW either.

Neuheisel was "relieved" to be able to avoid suspending Stevens, who was a key part of the Huskies' offense that season. One Rose Bowl with and two hit and run incidents later - including putting his truck through a nursing home wall - Stevens was finally subject to disciplinary action from the team: he was suspended for the first half of the season opener.

This quote from the article, in reference to a civil suit against the University of Washington, is telling:

In 2004, Roe deposed Rick Neuheisel and Barbara Hedges, the coach and athletic director when Stevens was arrested on suspicion of rape. When prosecutors decided not to charge Stevens, Neuheisel and Hedges agreed that Stevens should not be disciplined.

Neuheisel's test was this: If a player embarrassed himself, his family or the university, he should be punished. This episode embarrassed the UW, Neuheisel said, but "given the prosecution's decision not to go forward, it looked as if Jerramy was not the reason for the embarrassment."

Hedges said the UW could have disciplined Stevens no matter what prosecutors did, but she saw no grounds for that.

Do you understand, Roe asked Hedges, that a decision not to charge someone is not the same thing as declaring the person's innocence?

Hedges said she believed that if someone avoided charges, he had been cleared. "The person has been exonerated," she said.

She had no evidence to suggest Stevens' conduct was "inappropriate," Hedges said. Did you ever review the police reports? Roe asked. "I don't recall," Hedges said.

UW also distinguished itself with very aggressive tactics against the woman who brought the suit, including an effort to name and shame her while she was still a student.

The article goes on to discuss the extent to which Stevens' behavior has been enabled by professional teams as well - throughout his checkered career, all in the name of "giving a good kid a chance." Or 27 chances, as the case may be.

One of the things that struck me relating to the Neuheisel dismissal from UW and subsequent suit was that it looked like someone wanted him out and wanted an excuse - and they picked the wrong one. But if the stories in the Seattle Times are any indication, no wonder they wanted something less explosive. Trying to get someone removed for going along and getting along in that environment would require blowing the lid off problems that UW would probably prefer never came to light.

Back to Dan Guerrero

This is why Athletic Directors are so important. Barbara Hedges presided over a shambles of a program at UW, and Neuheisel was a part of that shambles. Guerrero runs a cleaner ship, and probably took on Neuheisel knowing that as AD, he would have to manage both public relations and compliance to make sure that all was well. If Neuheisel works at the level of the environment that he's in, then the bruins have nothing to worry about. If however Neuheisel was less a victim of circumstance in Seattle, and more simply showing how he works, then Dan Guerrero's got his work cut out for him.

0 recs | Comment 23 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

UW really screwed the RN thing all up
I'm going only on info I gleaned way back when RN filed suit against the university, but if memory serves me correctly- UW administration and legal counsel f_cked-up from the beginning and could have settled. Instead, the courts brought to light the egos and vindictiveness of all parties involved. RN had a beef, for all intents and purposes- I happened to agree with where he stood on the matter. Legally that is. Morally and ethically? Well let's just say, RN and I (prolly majority of human population too for that matter) are cut from a different cloth.

But holy macaroli! He got a favorable judgement. He got PAID.

DGuerrero is a friggin' shrewd and smart man. He'll have all his t's crossed and i's dotted without a stone left unturned to keep fucla from being "taken" by Slick Rick's type of tom-foolery. Personally, I think RN wants this gig to not only redeem himself among his peers in college coaching, but also to FORGIVE HIMSELF from the guilt and hurt he has caused to his own name.

I'm a USC guy through and through. Call me crazy, but I hope Rick Neuheisel succeeds. Yeah, he's new coach of the dreaded babyblueboys. . .but he's also a man who deserves a clean slate at redemption.

Better stop now before I start secreting crocodile-tears.

sidenote: i HAVE to say this though. what was Dan Guerrero thinking before firing KDorrell? It seems he didn't have plan A, plan B, plan C or plan D. Maybe he did? Public perception says he didn't. I guess you could say that DG is smart SOME OF THE TIME.

by tapoutstylist on Jan 28, 2008 3:52 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A fair question
It's hard to undertake succession planning when you need someone from outside the organization - trying to cover that up is difficult. So I wouldn't fault Guerrero for not having a replacement lined up immediately.

As for the specific conduct of the search, it seemed slow but that's not a crime. I remain convinced that the ucla job had some real downsides - facilities and salary being the two main ones - plus a perceived downside of being a tough climb against SC in town. Those could have been drag-anchors on the process.

That latter perceived downside is the least important of the list, IMHO, simply because there's so much talent in southern California - it shouldn't be hard to get good recruits.

So I don't know if Guerrero botched the process of the search, but since the end result was a shrewd hire, the process doesn't really matter.

by DC Trojan on Jan 28, 2008 6:27 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Very good points DC
You're so right about the end results. And RN really "went with it" from the get go.

I'll have to admit, that was some damn strategic UCLA-PR working throughout this past Bowl Season! If it wasn't scripted, it sure took on a healthy media life.

Speaking of AD's. I hear Garrett's protege (Daryl Gross) over at Syracuse is in some hot water? Now THAT'S A PARTY SCHOOL!  

by tapoutstylist on Jan 28, 2008 6:41 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

on the other hand. . . .
. . .sorry- I was asked to sit down to dinner from a girl I'm dating when I wrote the above/previous post from your post from my post. . .whew!  so anyway, yeah- on the other hand, the hiring of Slick Rick by Dan Guerrero was a shrewd hire only from the vantage point of time. And this is on 2 points:
  1. the fact that DG took a chance and brought RN on board when no one else was willing to (it's not like RN was a hot commodity. he was on the cutting block. his boss was fired, not likely he would remain on Ravens' staff even if he did it pro-bono) is a ballsy move because it's not like the Ravens were tearing it up. He'd been out of CFB for 5 years! The CFB landscape has changed dramatically. The spread is barely tinkered with in the NFL and it would seem a baffling re-entry when OC's and DC's are getting big bucks. And guess what Slick Rick? Most OC's and DC's in the CFB are probably BETTER at what they do than the HC's. This hiring is STILL up in the air, IMHO. Who knows? Sh_t can and will hit the fan at fucla sooner or later. It always does. And it always will.
  2. Who would have thought RN would be able to retain DeWayne Walker and attract Norm Chow to his staff? That's like the most! To say the least. He might even get Demetrice Martin too? Homeboy (RN) is hitting line drives all over place. Hard singles. Stolen a base or two. He's a swinger!
So, hindsight is our friend for this topic of RN's hiring. Let's wait til RN gets at least 8 or 9 wins next year before we anoint him the benefits  of smelling PC's crotch-rag! (i hear it's got aphrodisiac-like AND homeopathic qualities. winning will change you hormonally. it's like an adrenal polarity shift so I'm told?)

by tapoutstylist on Jan 28, 2008 10:41 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can't lie to your boss
Neu did it to Barbara Hedges.  That's why he was canned.  Guerrero insists that he made the rules very clear to Neuheisel, and got his word that there would be no funny business with the NCAA.  This is RN's last chance, I really don't think he is that stupid to try to bend the rules like he did in the past.

by frak on Jan 28, 2008 10:09 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree, but oh the irony
I think you're right about Neuheisel being smart enough to realize that this opportunity shouldn't be screwed up. But the idea of getting busted for lying to Barbara Hedges, exemplar of ethics, gives me my RDA for irony today.

by DC Trojan on Jan 29, 2008 8:27 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

One itty-bitty teeny-weeny last thing. . .or 2
Your Coach Rohrsach? (what a great title btw! capital!) Very nice touch. Especially with the word "picayune". Anything with picayune has my utmost attention. I even stared at the paragraph all weird and zoned-out like. What a blast! (got nothing though! nope. uh-uh. didn't see a thing)

You prolly wrote something all inch-high-private-eye didn't you. (yup. i missed it. i think)

by tapoutstylist on Jan 28, 2008 11:08 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

OMIGOD!
So I'm cruising "the internets" and come across BN's take on the whole UW and the DGuerrero with a little Slick Rick and the courts mixed with lawsuit, etc., etc., etc.

After reading Nestor's take, and then re-reading DC's take? I dunno? Hmmmmm? Mind you, DC wrote his piece a good 4-5 hours prior to Nestor's.

"Redemption"

That guy's gotta be kidding (??????)

by tapoutstylist on Jan 29, 2008 12:45 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What's really funny is
they have the nerve to call Carroll "Cheaty Petey" with a coach like Neuheisel running their program.

by frak on Jan 29, 2008 10:28 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Some have compared the Stevens situation
to the 3 players at USC charged with sexual assault.  All 3 of those players were suspended pending investigation by LAPD.  One was dismissed from the team and USC.  In all 3 cases the sexual assault charges were not filed due to lack of evidence.  This doesn't exonerate the persons accused I realize, but it does show that USC took appropriate action during the times that these players were in trouble.

Also, there has only been 1 player that repeated getting in trouble that I can think of, Winston Justice.  After his conviction for brandishing a replica firearm he was suspended for an entire season.  No other Trojan player has gotten in trouble more than once that I can remember.

by frak on Jan 29, 2008 11:10 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rationalization is a powerful thing

It helps to make the ugly more bearable.

Do I think RN will have trouble at ucla? No, I don't -he has too much riding on this and this is his alma mater so he would be nuts to tarnish ucla's name. He is conniving yes but nuts no.

That being said, this series articles of article shows that he did little if anything to instill a level of discipline while at UW, something that bruin fans have accused Pete Carroll of in the past. Rick has a past and will be mindful of it just like they constantly remind us of PC's alleged transgressions.

We can speculate as to why this is being brought up now but that is not my concern and I really don't care as other peoples/institutions motivation has no bearing on me. So ucla fans can cry about conspiracy theories all they want but it will fall on deaf ears as RN has only himself to blame, his inaction back then will haunt him as long as people continue to care about it.

by Paragon SC on Jan 29, 2008 1:35 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Eric Wright
Frak, although the only thing that ever came out about Eric was the ecstacy, based on Carroll's comments as he was tossed from the program, I suspect there were some other incidents that involved Eric.

by Mrtravlear on Jan 29, 2008 2:00 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes Eric Wright was tossed for the drugs
but there was never and charges filed on him for the sexual assault that I know of.  I think having over 100 tabs of X in your room is enough to throw someone out on their ear.

by frak on Jan 29, 2008 3:00 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Eric Wright
Sorry, didn't mean to imply that Eric's other trangressions, if there were any, had anything to do with sexual assault.  When he left, Carroll was quoted as saying something that lead me to believe he perceived him as having a negative impact on the program and he was happy he had left the program.  

Maybe somebody can dig up the actual quote

by Mrtravlear on Jan 29, 2008 4:05 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wright
Was a force in the 2004 Orange Bowl.  If he had been a problem prior to the drugs and assault allegations, I have never heard about it.  

by frak on Jan 29, 2008 4:15 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Amen
So was Steve Smith. Didn't Carroll think Wright steered Rocky Hinds to UNLV? Or was it the other way around?

That was a shady time early on in the PC-era. Winston. EWright. We were getting hammered in the media. bruin reaction was so strong and severe. And then Rey Rey and Sanchez? (in no particular order) It seemed there was no let up. The Sanchez thing still irks me some.

by tapoutstylist on Jan 29, 2008 5:42 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It should
The girl that accused him ended up leaving school, and from what I understand law enforcement wanted to proceed with the case but were left without a cooperative witness.  The detective in the case believed he was guilty, but without the girl, there was no case.  From what I know of the case, I would rather see Mustain get the job.

by frak on Jan 29, 2008 9:26 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

From my recollection
The witness didn't want to press charges, only her mother did.  I don't know all of the specifics, but the way it was portrayed to me by a friend of both Sanchez, and the victim, it was a non-issue that became an issue through the involvement of an overzealous parent.

Not positive, but that's how it was explained to me by a friend of the source.

Either way, I'd advise you not to render judgment just yet Frak.

Fight on!!! Beat the Wildcats!!!

by USCLink on Jan 30, 2008 3:10 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heard from the detective that investigated
Wright and Sanchez.  He thinks Sanchez is guilty.  No charges were filed because the girl left school, and didn't want the police to pursue the matter.  You can only imagine why a girl wouldn't want to be the accuser of a star QB for a #1 team.  I don't need to reserve judgment on this.  I have a problem with what Sanchez did, and I don't want to sit in the stands and root for that guy.

by frak on Jan 30, 2008 7:41 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bingo!
Dead on frak! My sentiments exactly.

Now that Mustain is eligible, I'd love to see him under the center. Last year, following the Stanford game- I had to go with Sanchez because he was (my belief) the only viable option to a hobbling Booty and an "underdeveloped" Booty (again, just my belief at that point of the season).

Not anymore.

Mustain's pedigree and "story" is something I would totally stand in line see. He makes us better on many levels. That said, I say give Sanchez a chance. But KEEP HIM ON A VERY TIGHT LEASH.  In my eyes, he doesn't get much benefit of a doubt. He lost it, and I'm a little unforgiving when it comes to family. The USC family. I'll always expect more from one of us. The conditioning we received and the culture that we all thrived in on campus is what sets us apart from the infantile elitists known as bruins. We got a real bang for our buck in our education. He (Sanchez)took advantage, in a big way, with ALL THAT. He deserves a chance at redemption like everyone else. But now he's gotta know he'll be held to a HIGHER STANDARD in most everything he does at USC. Everything.

by tapoutstylist on Jan 30, 2008 6:13 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

After reading some of the Seattle Times articles
My thoughts are that this is what you get for hiring Rick Neuheisel.  The positives are that you have probably the best coach you can get for your school.  The negatives are articles like these popping up.  They are inevitable.  Neuheisel's past will probably continue to haunt him for a while, but once he gets a few "clean" years in the books, it will all probably die down.  You can't expect to hire a guy like this and not have his past come back into the picture whenever there's a slow news day.

by frak on Jan 29, 2008 10:13 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not pretty pictures
UW had some dysfunction didn't it? It's fair to say that it looks like the UW admin and athletics had some issues pre-Neuheisel, coupled with an enabling law enforcement mixed with a lax "community" that maybe should have held UW's arse closer to the fire.

In hoping to take the high road, I'll say this. Neweasel has the cleanest slate he'll ever get in CFB with UCLA right now. I'm not saying fucla is squeeky-clean. I'm saying it ISN'T IN A CONSTANT state of dysfunction. There's a ton of checks and balances in place in the Wastewood community. So if Slick Rick goes off "the path", then he really is what they're saying up in Washington. A sociopath.

I hope he proves the people of Washington wrong. I hope he does well (not at the expense of USC) and mostly I hope he makes amends to those who he's directly or indirectly harmed from his scary past.

For all intents and purposes, if it was JUST NEUHEISEL newly hired for fucla (read: no DeWayne Walker, no Norm Chow)- we wouldn't be too much concerned about a fucla turnaround. A new fucla-order in CFB. Yeah he's a damn good coach. He's almost legendary now that he's got Chow and Walker. It's so easy to hate the guy. It's almost torture to wanna at least see him somewhat succeed.

by tapoutstylist on Jan 30, 2008 6:00 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Trojans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Untitled_small
Another year, same result: SEC/Big-12 OOC scheduling cowards, Pac-10 AD's are idiots

Recent FanPosts

Small
EJ Woods: Transformer
Speedyglez_small
The University of Felons
Dsc_0032_small
Patrick Turner signs 4-year deal with the fish
Speedyglez_small
OT: Ranking US Tax Oppression
Myspace_small
If you are not on "HIS" team you don't exist!
Small
Preseason Top 25
Dsc_0032_small
Why Notre Dame needs to be a top 10 team
Untitled_small
What's next for Ricky, "A Much Better LA" foundation?
Speedyglez_small
Doug Smith's Take on KO

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Sponsors


Managers

Dsc_0032_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan

Editors

Sc_logo_small Laughing Stock

Pintsize7zb_small Signal to Noise

Official Partner of CBS Sports