Why Good Athletic Directors Are Critically Important: Dan Guerrero vs Barbara Hedges
There's no doubt that a good Athletic Director sets the tone for a university's sports programs, and how they are perceived in the broader community. By all accounts, Dan Guerrero is a good athletic director, concerned about both running a clean shop and also setting up UCLA's teams to be successful on the field.
Judging by recent stories in the Seattle Times, he'll need to be vigilant so as to avoid having his work cut out for him.
Coach Rohrshach
When Neuheisel was hired, some looked at it as a declaration that winning was more important that a clean program, and some questioned the wisdom of the hire purely on the numbers: while Neuheisel's overall record was impressive, the year-on-year records showed steady worsening of results. UCLA alumni have countered with a variety of arguments (the charges were picayune, Neuheisel's win against UW for wrongful dismissal exonerates him, etc. ) which have various levels of merit. No surprise, people look at Neuheisel and see something based on themselves.
The general mood here on Conquest Chronicles was that the man can coach, but it's not clear that his recruiting (NCAA compliant or not) is as good as advertised. But we're also inclined to think that Neueheisel's a smart guy and has learned his lesson, that he brings real commitment to the job, and that he's serious about putting together a winning team for the bruins.
Go-along, get-along, away from problems
Nonetheless, it's hard not to raise an eyebrow or two at the series in the Seattle Times about the generally lax culture around the University of Washington and Neuheisel's Rose Bowl winning team. The problems of players being shielded from the law was in no way solely attributable to Neuheisel - the AD, Barbara Hedges, and local law enforcement were in many ways more influential in making this happen. However, when faced with a player, Jerramy Stevens, against whom rape accusations had been filed, Neuheisel was part of the problem. Despite evidence that made a charge credible, including patterns of violence and sexual misconduct, no charges were filed against Stevens and no action was taken at UW either.
Neuheisel was "relieved" to be able to avoid suspending Stevens, who was a key part of the Huskies' offense that season. One Rose Bowl with and two hit and run incidents later - including putting his truck through a nursing home wall - Stevens was finally subject to disciplinary action from the team: he was suspended for the first half of the season opener.
This quote from the article, in reference to a civil suit against the University of Washington, is telling:
In 2004, Roe deposed Rick Neuheisel and Barbara Hedges, the coach and athletic director when Stevens was arrested on suspicion of rape. When prosecutors decided not to charge Stevens, Neuheisel and Hedges agreed that Stevens should not be disciplined.
Neuheisel's test was this: If a player embarrassed himself, his family or the university, he should be punished. This episode embarrassed the UW, Neuheisel said, but "given the prosecution's decision not to go forward, it looked as if Jerramy was not the reason for the embarrassment."
Hedges said the UW could have disciplined Stevens no matter what prosecutors did, but she saw no grounds for that.
Do you understand, Roe asked Hedges, that a decision not to charge someone is not the same thing as declaring the person's innocence?
Hedges said she believed that if someone avoided charges, he had been cleared. "The person has been exonerated," she said.
She had no evidence to suggest Stevens' conduct was "inappropriate," Hedges said. Did you ever review the police reports? Roe asked. "I don't recall," Hedges said.
UW also distinguished itself with very aggressive tactics against the woman who brought the suit, including an effort to name and shame her while she was still a student.
The article goes on to discuss the extent to which Stevens' behavior has been enabled by professional teams as well - throughout his checkered career, all in the name of "giving a good kid a chance." Or 27 chances, as the case may be.
One of the things that struck me relating to the Neuheisel dismissal from UW and subsequent suit was that it looked like someone wanted him out and wanted an excuse - and they picked the wrong one. But if the stories in the Seattle Times are any indication, no wonder they wanted something less explosive. Trying to get someone removed for going along and getting along in that environment would require blowing the lid off problems that UW would probably prefer never came to light.
Back to Dan Guerrero
This is why Athletic Directors are so important. Barbara Hedges presided over a shambles of a program at UW, and Neuheisel was a part of that shambles. Guerrero runs a cleaner ship, and probably took on Neuheisel knowing that as AD, he would have to manage both public relations and compliance to make sure that all was well. If Neuheisel works at the level of the environment that he's in, then the bruins have nothing to worry about. If however Neuheisel was less a victim of circumstance in Seattle, and more simply showing how he works, then Dan Guerrero's got his work cut out for him.
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
UW really screwed the RN thing all up
But holy macaroli! He got a favorable judgement. He got PAID.
DGuerrero is a friggin' shrewd and smart man. He'll have all his t's crossed and i's dotted without a stone left unturned to keep fucla from being "taken" by Slick Rick's type of tom-foolery. Personally, I think RN wants this gig to not only redeem himself among his peers in college coaching, but also to FORGIVE HIMSELF from the guilt and hurt he has caused to his own name.
I'm a USC guy through and through. Call me crazy, but I hope Rick Neuheisel succeeds. Yeah, he's new coach of the dreaded babyblueboys. . .but he's also a man who deserves a clean slate at redemption.
Better stop now before I start secreting crocodile-tears.
sidenote: i HAVE to say this though. what was Dan Guerrero thinking before firing KDorrell? It seems he didn't have plan A, plan B, plan C or plan D. Maybe he did? Public perception says he didn't. I guess you could say that DG is smart SOME OF THE TIME.
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 28, 2008 3:52 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
A fair question
As for the specific conduct of the search, it seemed slow but that's not a crime. I remain convinced that the ucla job had some real downsides - facilities and salary being the two main ones - plus a perceived downside of being a tough climb against SC in town. Those could have been drag-anchors on the process.
That latter perceived downside is the least important of the list, IMHO, simply because there's so much talent in southern California - it shouldn't be hard to get good recruits.
So I don't know if Guerrero botched the process of the search, but since the end result was a shrewd hire, the process doesn't really matter.
by DC Trojan on
Jan 28, 2008 6:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Very good points DC
I'll have to admit, that was some damn strategic UCLA-PR working throughout this past Bowl Season! If it wasn't scripted, it sure took on a healthy media life.
Speaking of AD's. I hear Garrett's protege (Daryl Gross) over at Syracuse is in some hot water? Now THAT'S A PARTY SCHOOL!
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 28, 2008 6:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
on the other hand. . . .
- the fact that DG took a chance and brought RN on board when no one else was willing to (it's not like RN was a hot commodity. he was on the cutting block. his boss was fired, not likely he would remain on Ravens' staff even if he did it pro-bono) is a ballsy move because it's not like the Ravens were tearing it up. He'd been out of CFB for 5 years! The CFB landscape has changed dramatically. The spread is barely tinkered with in the NFL and it would seem a baffling re-entry when OC's and DC's are getting big bucks. And guess what Slick Rick? Most OC's and DC's in the CFB are probably BETTER at what they do than the HC's. This hiring is STILL up in the air, IMHO. Who knows? Sh_t can and will hit the fan at fucla sooner or later. It always does. And it always will.
- Who would have thought RN would be able to retain DeWayne Walker and attract Norm Chow to his staff? That's like the most! To say the least. He might even get Demetrice Martin too? Homeboy (RN) is hitting line drives all over place. Hard singles. Stolen a base or two. He's a swinger!
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 28, 2008 10:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can't lie to your boss
by frak on
Jan 28, 2008 10:09 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree, but oh the irony
by DC Trojan on
Jan 29, 2008 8:27 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
One itty-bitty teeny-weeny last thing. . .or 2
You prolly wrote something all inch-high-private-eye didn't you. (yup. i missed it. i think)
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 28, 2008 11:08 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
OMIGOD!
After reading Nestor's take, and then re-reading DC's take? I dunno? Hmmmmm? Mind you, DC wrote his piece a good 4-5 hours prior to Nestor's.
"Redemption"
That guy's gotta be kidding (??????)
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 29, 2008 12:45 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Correction: DC's piece was 12 hours prior
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 29, 2008 12:47 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What's really funny is
by frak on
Jan 29, 2008 10:28 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Some have compared the Stevens situation
Also, there has only been 1 player that repeated getting in trouble that I can think of, Winston Justice. After his conviction for brandishing a replica firearm he was suspended for an entire season. No other Trojan player has gotten in trouble more than once that I can remember.
by frak on
Jan 29, 2008 11:10 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Rationalization is a powerful thing
It helps to make the ugly more bearable.
Do I think RN will have trouble at ucla? No, I don't -he has too much riding on this and this is his alma mater so he would be nuts to tarnish ucla's name. He is conniving yes but nuts no.
That being said, this series articles of article shows that he did little if anything to instill a level of discipline while at UW, something that bruin fans have accused Pete Carroll of in the past. Rick has a past and will be mindful of it just like they constantly remind us of PC's alleged transgressions.
We can speculate as to why this is being brought up now but that is not my concern and I really don't care as other peoples/institutions motivation has no bearing on me. So ucla fans can cry about conspiracy theories all they want but it will fall on deaf ears as RN has only himself to blame, his inaction back then will haunt him as long as people continue to care about it.
by Paragon SC on
Jan 29, 2008 1:35 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Eric Wright
by Mrtravlear on
Jan 29, 2008 2:00 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes Eric Wright was tossed for the drugs
by frak on
Jan 29, 2008 3:00 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Eric Wright
Maybe somebody can dig up the actual quote
by Mrtravlear on
Jan 29, 2008 4:05 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Wright
by frak on
Jan 29, 2008 4:15 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen
That was a shady time early on in the PC-era. Winston. EWright. We were getting hammered in the media. bruin reaction was so strong and severe. And then Rey Rey and Sanchez? (in no particular order) It seemed there was no let up. The Sanchez thing still irks me some.
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 29, 2008 5:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It should
by frak on
Jan 29, 2008 9:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From my recollection
Not positive, but that's how it was explained to me by a friend of the source.
Either way, I'd advise you not to render judgment just yet Frak.
by USCLink on
Jan 30, 2008 3:10 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heard from the detective that investigated
by frak on
Jan 30, 2008 7:41 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bingo!
Now that Mustain is eligible, I'd love to see him under the center. Last year, following the Stanford game- I had to go with Sanchez because he was (my belief) the only viable option to a hobbling Booty and an "underdeveloped" Booty (again, just my belief at that point of the season).
Not anymore.
Mustain's pedigree and "story" is something I would totally stand in line see. He makes us better on many levels. That said, I say give Sanchez a chance. But KEEP HIM ON A VERY TIGHT LEASH. In my eyes, he doesn't get much benefit of a doubt. He lost it, and I'm a little unforgiving when it comes to family. The USC family. I'll always expect more from one of us. The conditioning we received and the culture that we all thrived in on campus is what sets us apart from the infantile elitists known as bruins. We got a real bang for our buck in our education. He (Sanchez)took advantage, in a big way, with ALL THAT. He deserves a chance at redemption like everyone else. But now he's gotta know he'll be held to a HIGHER STANDARD in most everything he does at USC. Everything.
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 30, 2008 6:13 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
After reading some of the Seattle Times articles
by frak on
Jan 29, 2008 10:13 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not pretty pictures
In hoping to take the high road, I'll say this. Neweasel has the cleanest slate he'll ever get in CFB with UCLA right now. I'm not saying fucla is squeeky-clean. I'm saying it ISN'T IN A CONSTANT state of dysfunction. There's a ton of checks and balances in place in the Wastewood community. So if Slick Rick goes off "the path", then he really is what they're saying up in Washington. A sociopath.
I hope he proves the people of Washington wrong. I hope he does well (not at the expense of USC) and mostly I hope he makes amends to those who he's directly or indirectly harmed from his scary past.
For all intents and purposes, if it was JUST NEUHEISEL newly hired for fucla (read: no DeWayne Walker, no Norm Chow)- we wouldn't be too much concerned about a fucla turnaround. A new fucla-order in CFB. Yeah he's a damn good coach. He's almost legendary now that he's got Chow and Walker. It's so easy to hate the guy. It's almost torture to wanna at least see him somewhat succeed.
by tapoutstylist on
Jan 30, 2008 6:00 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs






