USC Students Organizing Boycott of Coliseum Concessions
Paragon has been covering the brou-ha-ha between USC and the Coliseum Commission as it has taken on new life with USC's agreement with the Rose Bowl to play 2008 home games in Pasadena.
It's safe to say that nobody is particularly thrilled with this impasse. It's hard to understand why the Coliseum Commission can't understand a clear "no" from the NFL and is turning down the opportunity to have USC pay for renovations.
USC, after all, is the oldest tenant of the Coliseum; indeed their agreement to play football there was one of the contributing reasons for the construction of the stadium. It is also appropriate that USC - the main tenant and a private entity - pick up the tab for renovations, rather than holding hostage the taxpayers of Los Angeles or indeed the state of California.
One can only conclude that either the Commission thinks that USC is bluffing, or that they genuinely don't understand what it means to have Coliseum revenue drop off. This seems odd, as at least a couple of the Commission Members appear to have had applicable work experience, which in this case I would define as some P&L responsibility.
The USC Undergraduate Student Government (USG) and Graduate and Professional Student Senate (GPSS) are organizing a boycott of Coliseum concessions this weekend, to give the Coliseum Commission a preview of what it means to lose the concession money. The goal is that all students, alumni, and other fans will join in the effort and spend their money elsewhere.
Paragon quoted Coliseum Commissioner William Chadwick as saying the following:
Mr Chadwick apparently thinks that 2 years without USC football revenue is a minor detail for the Coliseum, which is the luxury of not having his job depend on financial results I suppose.
This ongoing debacle is ridiculous - USC and the Coliseum have been joined together since the Coliseum opened. No doubt there's room for negotiation, but the Coliseum Commission is doing the general public a disservice by holding out for an NFL team that isn't going to come.
If the Coliseum Commission doesn't believe that the University is really serious, perhaps their paying customers can give them a preview of what it's like to try and hit their operating costs on monster truck shows and flea markets.
If you're going to the Coliseum this weekend, please consider joining in the boycott.
0 recs |
11
comments
Comments
I am, and I will along with. . . .
What is the Coliseum Commission smoking? They're either smoking too much, or not enough of it- whatever it is.
What say you, Bruin-fans? If you're attending, are you guys gonna "pause for the cause"?
by tapoutstylist on Nov 29, 2007 8:51 AM PST 0 recs
A tricky question?
How about USC helps UCLA get rid of their coach, and UCLA helps lean on the Coliseum Commission to keep us out of the Rose Bowl? Talk about win - win!
by DC Trojan on
Nov 29, 2007 9:06 AM PST
up
0 recs
Hell yeah DC,
by tapoutstylist on
Nov 29, 2007 9:28 AM PST
up
0 recs
On Board...
Besides, it's all about the bacon-wrapped hot dogs outside the gates before the game and Chano's post-game.
Mmmmmm...chili cheese fries from Chano's.
See you there on Saturday. Fight On!
by Rex Cramer on
Nov 29, 2007 11:27 AM PST
up
0 recs
Political Morons
The only way to get this done is convince these dumbasses what an inexusable and embarrassing situation it would become for the only university in downtown Los Angeles located across the street from the only stadium in downtown Los Angeles playing football in Pasadena for no other reason than the city won't negotiate a lease. Students would have to line up within view of an empty Coliseum to get on a bus bound for Pasadena on game day.
Give the politicians some situation that allows them to make it look like they actually won the negotiations. They don't care about the actual details - just about the bullet point they can put on a political flyer. It's all impression with these political buffoons.
I will definitely not be spending a dime inside the Coliseum walls this Saturday.
by bwren on Nov 29, 2007 9:26 AM PST 0 recs
Commission = Ballwashers
Quite possibly because they wanted the same things - UPGRADE THE DAMN BUILDING. >.<
by Joe Trojan on Nov 29, 2007 10:34 AM PST 0 recs
Alternative
by frak on Nov 29, 2007 11:00 AM PST 0 recs
Bravo, joe trojan-
I know HDC doesn't have proper aesthetically pleasing configurations for a traditional "football pitch", then again- think about it. . . it kinda does. Still entertained? I know, BS! So anyways, think of the cost of a ticket at a limited seating "newer" venue, just down the road a piece in Carson. Yeah, Carson, CA- REALLLL close to Compton, uh huh! I'll give you 2 acronyms (?): 1) IKEA and 2) NWA
How' you like this now? It's a beautiful conflaguration of Kobe and Britney, throw in a Ferrari Enzo, a crazy robbery/bank heist in Burbank, reality TV, and your next door neighbor has "something to do with it all".
It's L.A.
by tapoutstylist on
Nov 29, 2007 12:22 PM PST
up
0 recs
Don't Laugh...
The only areas that seemed even theoretically possible - but not likely - were these:
- Level the Shrine and shoehorn something into the area bounded by Figueroa, Jefferson, S University, and W 30th.
- The parking lots by the Staples Center and the surrounding low-level commercial buildings looks
So, I don't know that there really is an obvious nearby alternative to the Coliseum. That would certainly correlate to the University's willingness to drop $100 million into the Coliseum - you'd not get a new stadium for that - certainly not one that was big enough or nearby.
by DC Trojan on
Nov 29, 2007 12:38 PM PST
up
0 recs
Will someone 2nd this notion?
I read it somewhere, sometime not long ago. Was it AEG or the Eli Broad consortium?
Anyone?
by tapoutstylist on Nov 29, 2007 3:32 PM PST 0 recs





