Arizona 67 USC 62: And so it ends
That's it. The Pac-10 tournament run is over. There won't be a nationally televised mid-afternoon game on CBS tomorrow. No reprise of 2009. And likely, no NCAA tournament appearance either.
Save a trip to the NIT, this is the finished product. A 19-14 overall record, a litany of wins over quality basketball teams, but an equal number of losses to inferior opponents. You've seen the resume. You've heard the arguments: wins over Arizona, Tennessee, Texas and UCLA, but losses to Oregon, Oregon State, Rider and TCU.
The selection committee is going to decide whether the Trojans are a tournament team on Sunday, and concede whether quality wins trump inexcusable losses. Because, for this team, that's what it comes down to.
With a seven-man rotation, and I hate to keep bringing this up, it becomes increasingly difficult to string together successive victories. The mere fact that they've won six out of their last eight games, which includes wins over Arizona and Washington, is a rather remarkable feat in its own right. But with a small roster, it becomes increasingly important for all seven to be effective nightly. And that sadly, that won't always happened; it wasn't the case against Arizona on Friday night either. Nikola Vucevic had a quiet 16 points (I stress quiet heavily) and Jio Fontan finished with 7 - both totals well below their season averages.
The talk around L.A. Live before the game centered on the suspension of Kevin O'Neill, whether it was the right decision or whether is was too preemptive. That aside, the players at least insist that his absence did not have a major impact on the game.
"K.O.is a big part of our team, but he is not going to go out there and play for us," Vucevic told the media following the game.
Fontan echoed similar sentiments.
"This is no disrespect to KO in any way, but I don't think him being here would have changed anything in the game."
Granted, they're going to say these things. They're not going to fault their coach's bar "fight" for a five-point loss to Arizona, a team which by the way has 12 of its last 14 games (note: ones of those two losses was to USC).
So the question now begs: Did the loss of O'Neill have an impact? It's the million dollar question. And yes, how could it not? He's the head coach, and for 32 games this season, he's paced the sidelines. So, why would the loss of a figurehead of consistency not have had an effect?
Defensive adjustments appeared slower, as Arizona shot over 40 percent from beyond the arc. At times, 'SC appear out of sync - on the defensive end. So, in all likelihood, O'Neill was missed no matter what was said.
But to say USC lost Friday, by five points, because O'Neill was missing might be a bit of a jump. It comes to individual accountability: Fontan needs to finish in double-figures, Alex Stepheson needs to provide scoring relief in the interior and somebody has to defend Derrick Williams, who finished with 20 points on 70 percent shooting.
Mind you Arizona is a good team and 'SC, despite the circumstances, played hard and nearly pulled off the upset. It's just too bad, really, that it couldn't have reached the 20-win plateau before the selection committee glances over its resume.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This team is much better than what I saw tonight.
We got killed on slow defensive switching and poor weakside rebounding. That lead to way too many open look 3’s and put back rebounds for the ‘Cats. We also didn’t play w/ enough urgency until it was too late (when there’s under a minute left and it’s a 3 point game, why do you wait to foul if you’re not even going to try and pressure the ball?!?!?!)
It’s a frustrating loss knowing that quicker coaching adjustments (especially on the defensive end) may have made the difference tonight, but still a hard fought game. I know the committee takes into account games where certain players were absent – perhaps they will take into account the fact that KO was absent for this game when evaluating the resume. VT winning tonight certainly didn’t do us any favors either. Who wants to play an NIT pool?
Great effort by the Trojans
Tough loss. But, the kids played with massive heart. A 6 man rotation for the most part against a deep, talented, 10 man rotation. And, we were within striking distance to win.
First, I still believe that we have a 50/50 shot at the tourney, despite what several prognosticators say. We need Zona to win the championship by more than 5 points. Then, the committee can make the argument that we were playing the 2nd best as a team in the tourney. We have better wins than any other bubble team. We were the 2nd hottest team in the conference over the last 4-6 weeks. I still think we have a shot.
That being said, how could KO’s absence not hurt the squad. If nothing else, he is an intimidating/influential factor with the refs.
Who, by the way, absolutely screwed us. Zona had 78% more FTA than us, and USC had 42% more fouls called against us. 1st team PacX player NicVu, and DPOY Marcus Simmons, both had 4 fouls against. Sure, we were tired and may have been a step slower late in the game. But, any casual fan had to take notice of the USC bodies being TOSSED AROUND All over the court. Moving picks with hip throws, elbows, reach ins, over the backs, the refs seemed oblivious to make calls against Zona’s ultra-aggressive defense last night. Yet, they were all too quick to make ticky tack touch calls against Nic and Marcus. It was shocking on TV. And, don’t get me started on a few of the possession calls.
In the end, that’s basketball. The calls don’t go your way some nights. And, the shots just don’t go down. Nic, Donte, and MoJo were 1-12 from the 3 point line, I think, with USC shooting under 30% from long range. If USC makes two more 3 pointers and shoots closer to our season avg of near 35%, we win. If the foul calls are even, we probably win. IF KO was not back-stabbed by our own administration, we probably win.
Tough, tough loss, but a great effort from the squad. I’m just livid that Pat Haden would throw the entire team under the bus before our biggest game of the season. I hate Pat Haden.
A Quick Note for the Quitters
No comment from this thread will be deleted. You will have to own them when we get it turned around and beat Southern Cal. You will never ride the bandwagon when we come back. Not on BN. GO BRUINS.
by Nestor on Sep 4, 2010 9:24 PM CDT
Hate Pat Hayden.... why not Paul Weitman for being......
I don’t there much choice regarding KO and the incident. I think Paul Weitman is an ass and apparently egged the O’Neils.
by trojanarchitect on Mar 12, 2011 9:20 AM PST reply actions
actually it's really a six man rotation
Jackson’s time is VERY limited
Oh, Mama, can this really be the end
To be stuck inside of Mobile
With the Memphis blues again
-R. Zimmerman

by 










