USC ends CFB season at AP #5.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings
For Oregon, the idea of playing in the "inaugural PAC-12 Championship game" seems to have dropped them below USC but also moved them up 2 places to 6
I also note that SEC teams 1-2, Big 12 - OSU #3, and then THREE PAC-12 teams are 4-6 (Stanford, USC, Oregon).
This poll makes me wonder where PAC-12 would have been had USC athletes been allowed to take the field and compete.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings
For Oregon, the idea of playing in the "inaugural PAC-12 Championship game" seems to have dropped them below USC but also moved them up 2 places to 6
I also note that SEC teams 1-2, Big 12 - OSU #3, and then THREE PAC-12 teams are 4-6 (Stanford, USC, Oregon).
This poll makes me wonder where PAC-12 would have been had USC athletes been allowed to take the field and compete.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors.
Poll
IS USC CORRECTLY RANKED?
72%
Yes (54 votes)
No, USC should be higher (17 votes)
No, USC should be lower (3 votes)
74 total votes
There are 19 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.