Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Checkin' on the Pac: Oregon

With Pac-10 media day now in the books, it's time to start looking toward training camp and the actual 2010 season, which will likely be one of the more wide-open races in the recent history of the conference. We certainly know a lot of the ins-and-outs of the USC roster, but how much do we know about our Pac-10 counterparts? To shore up any gaps in our knowledge, we'll be running a 9-part interview series with many of the best team-specific Pac-10 blogs on the web. For part two, here's a Q&A with Jared Light of SB Nation's Addicted To Quack for some info on the Oregon Ducks:

Q: Since I'm an LA guy, I want to know; which divorce has been nastier: Jeremiah Masoli/Chip Kelly or Reggie Bush/USC?

A: Bush/USC by far. Masoli made some incredibly dumb decisions, but also didn't do anything that actually took away from previous seasons. Unlike the Bush scandal, other teams can't accuse Oregon of cheating during the season. 

I think that a lot of Duck fans are saddened by the whole Masoli story, and wish him success in his future endeavors. It's not often that someone's life can fall apart that quickly, and a lot of Duck fans want to see him be able to put his life back together, but just away from Oregon. There are obviously some Duck fans that are bitter, but I think those fans are in the minority. 

Q: With Masoli gone, and LaMichael James to be suspended for the opener against New Mexico, do you anticipate the offense to be just as explosive in 2010 as it was in 2009. In other words, are you guys really going to put 47 points up on the scoreboard against our Trojans again?

A: The offense will not be as explosive in 2010, and I doubt they'll put up 47 on USC again (though really, the 613 yards was more impressive). But that may not be a bad thing. Though Oregon was very explosive last year, they had a lot of issues with consistency. They would be brilliant at times, and fall apart at others. USC saw one of Oregon's only complete games offensively (Cal would be the other). For almost two quarters, Oregon could not move the ball against Arizona, and had similar problems against OSU, which almost cost them both games. three and outs for the offense have been a real problem for Oregon the last two seasons.

This year, Oregon should be improved in the passing game, as either Nate Costa or Darron Thomas should be an improvement in the passing game. Masoli was simply too inconsistent, and that showed, especially in the Rose Bowl. While Costa or Thomas won't be the home run threat Masoli was on the ground, I am hopeful that both can make up for that by keeping the defense more honest in the passing game, which will hopefully lead to more sustained drives. 

Star-divide

Q: Last year, UO didn't really seem to have a #1 wide receiver step up on take command. Jeff Maehl was the leading receiver, but for how effective the offense was, it didn't seem as if Masoli had a "guy." Does that change at all this year?

A: Most likely not, but we may see someone step up if the passing game improves. I'm really excited to see what D.J. Davis and Lavasier Tuinei can do. Both have the potential to be downfield threats, and I'm hoping that either QB will be able to exploit that.

However, I still don't see a "guy" developing. None of the receivers seem to be dominant that they will be a focal point in the offense. So the ball will be spread around to everyone, rather than one player dominating the touches.

Q: There's been a lot of talk this offseason about how this could be the best Oregon defense in a while. Is that just preseason hype or is there any truth in that assertion?

A: I think there's plenty of truth to that assertion. Oregon was the top defense in the Pac-10 last season according to metrics that measure by play, which is very important when looking at Oregon due to the number of plays they run per game.

Oregon has one of its most athletic and talented linebacker units in school history, which gives defensive coordinator Nick Aliotti a freedom and creativity he hasn't had since the 1994 season. They also have a lot of experience and talent in the secondary, which was able to withstand injuries to Walter Thurmond and T.J. Ward last season. On the line, they have few dominant players, but also no one that will get pushed around. 

The unit really works together well, and that's borne out in last years numbers. With the added experience, Duck fans expect a lot this season.

Q: With all the offseason trouble, many 'SC fans have taken to referring to Eugene as Gainseville East. Do you anticipate any of the off the field distractions playing a role when the season comes around?

A: There's always that possibility, but we don't expect that. Let's not forget that last season, many were writing off Oregon's season after LeGarrette Blount's punch in Boise. But, the team fought through the adversity and channeled that to win a Pac-10 title. 

If anything, I think the combination of the Rose Bowl loss and the offseason issues have helped the team come together and given them resolve to attain their goals this season. That may not happen, but I don't think the offseason issues (outside of personnel loss) will affect the team in a negative way.

Q: Last year, Oregon won the Pac-10 and ended up celebrating New Year's in Pasadena. What are the chances the Ducks up in the Granddaddy this year as well?

A: I'd say they are very good, especially since USC isn't eligible to go. Oregon returns a ridiculous amount of talent from a Pac-10 winning team. They return their entire offensive line, lose only 2 players off the entire offensive two deep (that's including Masoli), have the best RB unit in the Pac-10. Should they get even adequate QB play, they will compete for the conference title. If they can develop a downfield passing game, watch out.

For Duck fans, it's an odd feeling having most of the question marks on the offensive side of the ball. But Chip Kelly has been able to churn out great offenses with ease, helps give us quite a bit of confidence going into the season.

The Pac-10 will be very tough this year, but despite the loss of Masoli, Oregon is rightly the favorite to head to Pasadena.

Comment 165 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

1 win and 4 losses =

Oregon’s miserable record in the Rose Bowl.

With USC ineligible, perhaps Oregon is justified to consider themselves “rightly the favorite to head to Pasadena”. But you’ve got to aspire to more than just getting there. USC carried the Pac-10 on its back in OOC play throughout the past decade, leading many to label the the conference Pac-1+9. It will be interestinng to see if any other Pac-10 teams can rise to the occasion during USC’s post-season ban.

Since the inception of the BCS in 1998, USC has won 5 (5-1) BCS games, while the rest of the conference has won 3 (3-4).

by TrojanJAG on Aug 3, 2010 2:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Bitter TrojanJAG?

USC has not lugged the entire weight of the conference in the past decade, I couldn’t disagree more. YES, the Trojans have done a extraordinary job when reaching those BCS games and whipping teams like Oklahoma and Penn State. Pete’s teams played well in the spotlight, and in those big out of conference games regular season or in bowl play, the Trojans had a great record. It’s quite lethargic and ignorant to ignore things that took place in the regular season and what other Pac-10 teams have done. What about Oregon blowing out Michigan in Ann Arbor handing the Wolverines their worst home loss in the history of the Big House? Four years earlier, the Ducks ran Michigan out of the stadium and beat them thoroughly in Eugene. The Ducks getting snubbed out of a national title shot at Miami, and instead crushing a formerly #2 ranked Colorado team; the same year the Ducks beat the Top 20 Wisconsin Badgers on national TV. What about a win against Oklahoma in Eugene, containing Adrian Peterson just enough to get the win. (onside kick of not, we still had to score and won)

I’m the first to admit, I’m not completely drunk by the Cool-Aid, I recognize Oregon has not had the best bowl record and has been unable to distinguish itself as a national player year in and year out. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to compare Oregon’s zero national titles and zero Heisman trophies in the Casanova Center with USC’s storied past, especially in the Carol era. What I am trying to say is that Oregon I think has done a good job of shouldering the load of flying the Pac-10 flag outside of the conference.

Friends dont let friends go to Oregon State, hell, even root for them.

by WashingtonDCduck on Aug 4, 2010 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great Stuff Joey!

really liking these…

"Mention USC to a Bruin and they get angry; mention UCLA to a Trojan and they laugh."

Conquest Chronicles

by Paragon SC on Aug 3, 2010 2:49 PM PDT reply actions  

+1 Well done Joey, and thanks!

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 3, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Question or clarification.....

With SC’s bowl ban, if SC wins the PAC outright doesn’t the Rose Bowl committee have the right to pick another Team — similar to when they picked TX over Cal when SC went to Miami for the BCS game?

by trojanarchitect on Aug 3, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

That was another of the famous "Coaches Poll" biases

And it was retarded!

What happened was Cal was practically #4 in all polls leading up to the last week. They won their last 7 games en route to being Pac 10 runner up. With a weird stroke of lobbying by Mack Brown (UT’s cunning coach)- the Coaches Poll catapulted Texas over Cal to get the at-large berth for the BCS Rose Bowl and Texas went on to dismantle Michigan (I think?).

Cal was scary good that year. They lost to us at the Coliseum (my birthday weekend)- but it was a game that coulda gone either way.

The AP college football poll left the BCS altogether after all that shilling by Texas and the “packing the ballot box” by those Big 12 & SEC coaches. It was a stain on the game for sure.

The Rose Bowl had no choice but to award the game to Texas over Cal. It was a weird circumstance that I think has been rectified since then- giving the Rose Bowl Committee more leeway to bringing in a traditional Pac 10/Big Televen New Year’s Day game.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 3, 2010 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

When it comes to professional WHINING!

Mack is a brother in arms with Tubberville

"Understanding is a virtue, hard to come by"
J. Airplane

by gnossos on Aug 3, 2010 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

OUCH!

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 3, 2010 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

mumm...

Sorry — but I think it was the Rose Bowl Committee’s choice — TX over Cal…. I remember it not being well received here specifically because the Committee had a choice because Cal was still in the top 10 anyway before losing badly in the Holiday Bowl. The question was whether or not that possibility still existed now… as scenario.

by trojanarchitect on Aug 3, 2010 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

True! And the Pax-10 is perfectly positioned to get punked again.

This is why Larry Scott damn better start putting up a fight with the NCAA about how by attacking USC they’re punishing the entire Pax-10.

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 3, 2010 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

You are correct, as it applies to BCS bowls now. . . but not then

The Rose Bowl HAD TO take Texas, they didn’t have a say in the matter.

The Rose Bowl, as it stands NOW can pick a top 10 seeded team if it wants to preserve it’s Big 10/Pac 10 game. This wasn’t the case in 2004. (i thought i tried writing that in my first comment?)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 5:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm fairly certain the Rose Bowl committee would have loved to have Cal in 2004

They were almost printing up the media guides for a Cal team in the Rose Bowl.

They WERE THWARTED!

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 6:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Something for Jared

What makes you think USC was cheating. USC didn’t CHEAT! Cheating is something that is part and parcel of the program as a whole. Cheating is something the team or players do to get a competitive advantage on the field of play.

Jared, don’t go all SEC on us and accuse us of cheating.

Now I know this sounds hyper-defensive and all semantic-like- but USC didn’t cheat. Our one player’s family hedged their bets and tried to cash in on their son’s celebrity. That son, for reasons we still cannot deduce- did the same for himself when he found his family was in deep.

Does that really equate to cheating? Does Reggie’s pimped out Impala have any bearing on the field of play? That’s what cheating is. Gaining an unfair advantage on the field of play.

The NCAA has deemed “benefits” as an infraction. Benefits from boosters or coaches or administrators may or may not gain an advantage on the field of play. In this instance, with Reggie Bush- nothing was gained on the field of play. There was no cheating, sir.

Infractions occurred with Reggie’s eligibility- BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DID USC CHEAT!!!!!!!

(yeah, I’m hot under the collar. this shit is ridiculous!)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 3, 2010 8:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Prison Gang Green Smells Fowl

Jared, as a reputable SBN blogger, you should be embarrassed by your lack of knowledge WRT USC’s sanctions. USC did not “cheat”, as your favorite columnists on Sportsline have written so frequently. USC did not know what “they should have known” per the NCAA, which is that Reggie and family took some illicit benefits from a long-time neighborhood acquaintance and family friend in San Diego. The “friend” was trying to lure Reggie into signing with his sports agency and departing USC early for the NFL draft.

USC did not know. Pete Carroll did not know. USC staff and boosters did not know. The NCAA report offers no direct proof that anyone at USC knew. The NCAA claims that USC should have known what Reggie’s stepfather was up to 200 miles away from campus. And, to make my point, the benefits were to LURE REGGIE AWAY from USC, not recruit him or keep him at USC. They were to USC’s DISADVANTAGE!

Furthermore, after a 4-year on campus witch hunt of unprecedented resource investment, the NCAA found ONLY ONE football player had crossed the line. I dare say that the NCAA would uncover dirt at any major program if they snooped around for 4 years. If anything, the NCAA proved just how clean USC is.

USC cheated? F U! You lost me there. But, I continued to scroll down your post a bit further. U O has the “best RB unit” in the PacX – delusional. U O is returning a “ridiculous amount of talent”? How many are projected to be drafted….two? This could be the best U O defense in a while? So, opponents will only average 35 pts/gm rather than 42? U O should be improved in the passing game? Hello, Jared, you RUN A SPREAD OPTION! Costa will not last the season if he drops back to pass too often requiring blocking from the miniscule woman beater LaMichael.

We appreciate the effort, but you have been overexposed to the fumes in Phil Knight’s sweat shop factories, my fowl friend. The fact is that U O sucks on the road. Away from Autzen, UO is embarrassingly mediocre, much to the chagrin of the PacX in last year’s Rose Bowl fiasco. UO can only play on turf, and can only play well in the Pac NW. UO will likely lose at Tenn, ASU, Cal, USC, and OSU. That’s right, the Beavs owe you a beat down in Corvallis this season. Don’t get cocky and presume a victory over your archrival in that game.

Thanks for playing Jared, but U O’s best offenses this year were in the Eugene court system. Tell Phil that you can’t buy championships in college.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 3, 2010 9:56 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

“Unlike the Bush scandal, other teams can’t accuse Oregon of cheating during the season.” (Jared Light)

This is what I’m thinking: Considering the Bush scandal- NO ONE can accuse USC of cheating.

Matter of fact Jared- define “cheating”.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 3, 2010 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

First of all, I didn’t say that I thought that USC cheated. I could honestly care less about this little soap opera, and I thought USC would get almost no sanctions. I think what happened was overly harsh considering what happened.

But that doesn’t change the fact that other fanbases and columnists are accusing USC of cheating. Contrasting Bush with Masoli, Oregon isn’t getting wins or championships vacated due to Masoli’s wrongdoing (whether that is fair or unfair).

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Aug 4, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the clarification

We’ll go on record as Addicted to Quack doesn’t believe USC cheated then. That’s great.

I have no issue with your answer whatsoever regarding the Bush/Masoli shenanigans from USC and UofO respectively.

Like I said, I’m hyper-sensitive about this whole “cheating” business.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you, Jared

As you can see, we are touchy about the “C” word, but for what it’s worth, I read your sentence as it was intended, and you’re right, people are throwing “cheating” around on us all the time now.

by socaljml on Aug 4, 2010 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess the problem with the "C word" is that it suggests you gained an unfair advantage on the field

When people tend to think of cheating, they think of a corked back, steroid use, shaving points, etc., that all directly impact the results on the field. That’s why sports fans are so sensitive to cheating; because it tends to impact who wins or loses the actual games.

The Bush thing was pure and simply a violation of NCAA rules. If you want to call it cheating or not, whatever. It’s merely a minor technicality at this point. It didn’t make the 2004 or 2005 team any better. So, I think when people say, “Oh, USC cheated in ’04 and ’05,” it suggests the 13-0 and 12-1 records were somehow illegitimate, because they had an unfair advantage.

We hate that notion. Granted Bush pocketed thousands, but it didn’t bring him to USC in the first place (wasn’t a recruiting method at all), and it didn’t enable him to run any faster. That’s why many of us tend to be sensitive about the word “cheating” because it tends to illegitimize 2004 and 2005, when in reality, it had little impact regarding what happened on the field.

Follow me on twitter @Joey_Kaufman

by Joey Kaufman on Aug 4, 2010 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

I obviously could have used a better word. My point was merely to say that USC has now opened itself up to that charge. One of our commenters over at ATQ likened it to the charges Oregon has gotten about a lack of discipline, which is a pretty good comparison.

I think both these charges are ultimately untrue, but there was at least a basis for the question being asked. And the trolls will always run with it even if it ends up being untrue.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Aug 4, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

I definitely agree in that there are similarities.

Whatever happened to personal accountability? It seems as if we’re placing the blame at the programs for everything, when in reality, the individual athletes are the ones getting arrested and violating rules. Time to drop the whole “they’re kids” approach and start hammering them a bit more.

Follow me on twitter @Joey_Kaufman

by Joey Kaufman on Aug 4, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

we are touchy about the "C" word

What the hell does that have to do with anything?!?!

::someone whispers in his ear::

OOohhhh… “cheating”… right. Umm… what were we talking about again?

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Actually...

I am just a degenerate that watches terrible television shows.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 10:48 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I thought JS's comment was an attempt at humor?

I might be misunderstanding the gist of his funny comment (it was, by the way), but I think he’s putting context here. Afterall, the post you put up Joey was about Oregon and how ATQ is assessing this year’s Oregon team. And not about “cheating” and this year’s USC team.

I could be wrong though. (if I am, than. . . . .your humor is entirely lost on me JS)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pretty much. At least some people understand me. Can I get you to talk to my mom and help her understand me now?

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 10:54 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Then in that case:

H I L A R I O U S! (JS- she still hates seeing dirty, janky, smelly socks in the corner of your home. independent of the fact you no longer have a room at hers. it just AIN’T RIGHT, my boy!)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

But if I clean my socks in the corner, all of my taco bell wrappers and half eaten beam burritos will be revealed!

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 11:12 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Dang! That's a damn good point

As is soulja! Keep them socks where they’re at. As an epicure, I can appreciate the emulsifying aroma emanating from the corners and crevices of your home. Damp, teen-agey, sweaty socks are so 15 years ago!

JShufelt Reserve, have we? Noxious!

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Considering that it’s been a while since I was a teenager, those socks have been reaking it up for a while.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

As my sisters are happy say:

GROSS!

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well Tex, somehow I knew you wouldn't let that one ger by

So since you’ve opened that door yeah it would have been nice if Joey had called BULLSHIT when Jared opened his trap about USC “cheating.” And I agree, the ducks are going to get bitch slapped by the beavs in Corvallis, and the Bears have a damn good chance of exacting their own kind of revenge. You might also want to add Stanfurd to the list of potential losses. Now that the ducks have the target painted on their backs we’ll get to see how they wear it.

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 3, 2010 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uh, 8:16 pm is a lot earlier than 9:56 pm, no?

Just saying.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 5:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like how you thinks he called Bush/USC cheaters, and then go off on a tirade of insults.

You are what makes the internet an awesome adventure, sir! Props are deserved.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 7:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're a real dumbass DFWTrojan

Why don’t you go do some research of your own. L James didn’t beat anyone up. Go and read it yourself, you can find the details online. And how is his comment that Oregon returns the best RB group delusional? You are the very reason I can’t stand USC and it’s smug attitude. I laugh my ass off every time I go down to the Coliseum and sit in the stands and listen to the moronic comments made by Trojan faithful. Maybe it’s all the smog in the air, or stress from the constant gang violence in beautiful SoCal not sure, but you obviously have not done your own research and made yourself sound like an idiot.

In terms of the program being dirty, you can justify it any way you like big guy. USC IS ON PROBATION AND GOT MORE THAN A SLAP ON THE WRIST. You can curl, coil, twist and turn the word ‘cheating’ any way you’d like. After the Bush thing blew up on yahoosports.com years ago, and people starting paying closer attention to the entire athletic program it was blatantly obvious that Garret was running a circus.

My family met a group of USC Boosters/Alums at the Oregon Electric Station back in 2005, and ended up eating with them in the bar area the Friday night before Bush and Company made their tour stop in Eugene. They brought up possible sanctions, WE DIDN’T, they did. This was 2005. One of the guys, an attorney in L.A. and active booster for the program was saying that there were rumblings amongst a few that they didn’t like Pete’s celebrity program he was running despite all the success and they were worried. That was nearly 5 years ago. You can deny it all you want, and I’m not going to act like I knew what happened but I know this, the NCAA hit USC real hard, a USC program that is a big money maker for everyone, and that would not have happened if USC didn’t stink of blatant gross negligence.

See you Saturday night October 30th.

Friends dont let friends go to Oregon State, hell, even root for them.

by WashingtonDCduck on Aug 4, 2010 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

This will end swell!

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 10:57 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

My goodness, you used the word "swell"?????

Fucking-A man, you are cracking me up this morning. Hey Jared? Is JShufelt ALWAYS this gosh-darn funny?

Swell? (Leave it to beavers. . . . OOOOOPS! I mean, Ducks ;- )

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fuckin’-O. It’s smoother than an A.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 11:08 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Tissssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

You on FIRE today Mr. (“O”. . . . . .I get it!)

Good luck to you guys, JShufelt. And like I wrote to y’all back when Masoli’s plea came in- you guys are still pretty badass without him and I know you guys will do the Pac 10 proud this year. (I hope Kelly & Co. beat the crap outta Tennessee, I might wanna put some money on that game- with a Duck win?)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Shufelt is never funny. He smells bad and we send him to other people’s boards so he leaves us alone.

You guys want to keep him?

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 4, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Please! I’ll be that adorable puppy that everyone loves, until it eats your sofa, PS3 controllers. the remote control to the TV, and pees EVERYWHERE.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

We'll take him!

Throw in a Duck cheerleader or two and YOU HAVE YOURSELF A DEAL! (Paragon, . . . .no big deal! Trust me, Shufelt can go incognito over at BN and stink up that joint for us, posing of course as Bruce Davis. Crying and all!!!!)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I looked at BN once. I got banned.

And if I throw in a duck cheerleader, I’m afraid they’ll have to stay with me. For… you know… protection.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not if you're a Trojan!

Ba-dum-tish! (sersly, I don’t know what I mean? and I’m me!)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s hardly a badge of honor. They practically give that crap away there!

Buy 1, get 2 bans free!

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

You got banned from BN?

Who hasn’t? Unless you change your screen image to something with Baby Blue and Gold and your sig to something nasty about the Trojans, any comment you make will get you banned.

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 4, 2010 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I heard their head honcho has a disposable penis

He keeps it tucked away in his man-purse. Only brings it out when Trojans walk past him.

It’s a recession, but that guy takes things way too seriously!

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

mum

Need a little anger management? Why are you bothering to sit in the Coliseum…. seems like the last place on earth you would want to be?

by trojanarchitect on Aug 4, 2010 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

BitchslappedDuck. That's a rec!

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 4, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Holy shit!

I thought I was Bix?

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have changed my signature, after 1 1/2 years!!!!

You, JShufelt, are my SB Nation hero! Major, digging your show!

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m honored!

(For the first time ever!)

I will let this go to my head, and I’ll develop hyper-narcissism, which will take years of psychological rehab to get out of!

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 4, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

James R gets several carries a game

And, with that revision, I rest my case. Jared is a Duck. Nothing more needs to be said.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Most QB's also have designed running plays....does that make them a RB? Ridiculously obsurd statements require equally obsurd responses.

Honestly there is nothing in Jared’s response that is inflammatory towards the Trojan program as he stated his choice of word could have been better. Take a cue from the majority of the other Trojan fans on this board and try not to take yourself so seriously.

by ppilot on Aug 5, 2010 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1 Reply Fail

Our football IQ is pretty high on this site, so you are fighting an uphill battle. While listed as a WR, James Rodgers is a utility player for OSU and the #2 leading rusher for the Beavs. He has several designed rushing plays per game and has to be included in any discussion of the Beavs rushing attack as the second leading ball carrier.

Reply fail on multiple levels.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 5, 2010 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

and Jake Locker was the second leading rusher for UW, so I guess that makes Locker the ? in:

Polk/?

when talking about rushing duo’s that will out perform Oregon’s. The question was about top returning RB’s, not RB and WR or RB and punctuation mark. I would think you would get that with all that football IQ you have.

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 5, 2010 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Add in Masoli for the Ducks for being a RB.

Apparently teams recruit running backs and use them all over the field. If you really think that running WR end arounds (the fly sweep) automatically equates that player’s position as being a RB….if anything it’s good for a laugh. So is Quiz Rodgers a WR because he was second in receptions on OSU?

by ppilot on Aug 5, 2010 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Our football IQ is pretty high on this site, so you are fighting an uphill battle.

That reminds me of the days of Bunker HIll.

WR’s running fly-sweeps, HBs tossing the ball, and safeties playing center field. Blood everywhere. We had no chance! The play clocks were counting down everywhere – we were running out of time but General Brooks told us to wait until we see the whites of their eyes!

That day, we were told to HOLD THE LINE.
It’s a new day, but men, today is no different. We must HOLD THE LINE!

(I don’t know what I mean, because my football IQ is sooooo low.)

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 5, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Toto

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/200332/854578

"Understanding is a virtue, hard to come by"
J. Airplane

by gnossos on Aug 5, 2010 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Beautiful. You have won the day!

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 6, 2010 8:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Like shooting waterfowl with a .10 gauge

One of the most versatile players in the nation, James has the second-highest total of all-purpose yards among active players entering 2010 with 5,077. He is just the second OSU player to achieve 1,000 yards rushing and 1,000 yards receiving in his career. As a running back, James has over 1,300 career rushing yards, 9 TDs, and averages over 50 carries per season.

The discussion was about RB units, and OSU uses the versatile James as the #2 RB in its offense. Pay attention this season, as James and Jacque should run all over the Prison Gang Green. Did they have to build a special unit at Eugene City Jail for the Ducks footballers?

Have fun at Jared’s transgender parties, fellas. Your football acumen doesn’t quite cut the mustard around here. You’d be better served to rent Without Limits and learn Cantonese so that Uncle Phil might employ you some day.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 5, 2010 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

The discussion was about RB units

That’s great, Mr. Football IQ, so I guess Football IQ’s definition of RB units consists of more than running backs, right?

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve heard in a while.

“Well I’d rather have a WR, a punctuation mark and QB as my RB duo than two proven running backs” "It so freaking obvious, I don’t even feel the need to explain why I said:

Vereen/?, Polk/?

I’ll just continue to throw out bird euphemisms and hope that no one pays attention to my entire lack of anything intelligible in my argument"

Keep it up nitwit, your hole is only getting bigger.

Pay attention this season, as James and Jacque (sp) should run all over

ummmmm, what’s USC’s record against both Rodger’s brothers compared Oregon’s? And the hole gets bigger and bigger…

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 5, 2010 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

ummmmm, what’s USC’s record against both Rodger’s brothers compared Oregon’s? And the hole gets bigger and bigger…

You guys are not even close to being able to pull ‘oh yeah well we won more games’ non sequiturs on USC yet.

this is my signature! there are many like it but this one is mine!

by RabbitSC on Aug 5, 2010 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

No one is the pulling the “non-sequitur” argument whatsoever. The argument was presented that:

James and Jacque should run all over the Prison Gang Green

and the response was justly, what is more likely given Rodger’s Brother’s History?

The real non-sequitur arguments are as follows:

Did they have to build a special unit at Eugene City Jail for the Ducks footballers?

Your football acumen doesn’t quite cut the mustard around here.

Vereen/?, Polk/?

Feel free to attack the right party in this argument when it comes to non-sequitur arguments and use of appropriate justification.

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 5, 2010 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

At least we’re having a nice football discussion with points and counter-points.

I mean, clearly we’ve been talking football around here, and proving our “football acumen” instead of tossing insults.

Well, not me. I’m a football r-tard and I am hopelessly outmatched here. I actually thought RBs were RBs.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 6, 2010 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're pretty good at pointing out hypocrisy, though.

Although something tells me DFW didn’t bother to click on the link to LaMichael James’ sentencing memorandum that disproved his claim that he’s a ‘miniscule woman beater’.

Although, he would never make this deduction without satisfying himself with proof, all available online in the reports, would he?

"Seriously, baby, I can prescribe anything I want!" - Matt Daddy

by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 6, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

We all know that the negotiated plea

does not tell the real story. the police report tells the story, beaten, strangled, assaulted, thrown to the ground. and, a history of violence as a repeat offender.

Masoli wa a choir boy compared to this LaMichael thug. What is the going rate for players at Phil Knight’s Bail Bonds?

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Again, did you read the sentencing memorandum?

Because it spells out what happened word for word. In painful detail, that basically shows the incident was nothing more than a jilted ex-girlfriend getting in a spat with LaMichael, and physically assaulting him first.

I mean clearly you’re a troll and I shouldn’t be feeding you, but you’re making it so easy.

"Seriously, baby, I can prescribe anything I want!" - Matt Daddy

by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 6, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Here's one that wasn't written by a lawyer, in case you really want to know the truth.

Even though it’s pretty clear that you don’t.

The truth: LMJ is a demonic, evil person.

"Seriously, baby, I can prescribe anything I want!" - Matt Daddy

by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 9, 2010 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

All-purpose player

Is apparently something that you guys can’t comprehend. I can only assume that you have never played football, and are myopically focused on the position titles in the media guide.

Percy Harvin was an All Purpose player who played WR and RB and Returner at UF. Was Reggie Bush a RB or a WR? His position was officially RB, yet he lines up and plays significantly as a receiver.

James Rodgers is an All Purpose player who lines up most at WR, but also plays some running back and is the second leading rusher for the Beavs. In 2007, he backed up Yvenson Bernard. In 2008, he AND McCants would spell Quizz. McCants was injured in 2009, and thus, James was Quizz’s primary back-up.

Anyone remember these:
- 9/19/09 OSU vs Cinci, James R 11 rushes, 67 yards
- 11/22/08 OSU @ UA, James R 10 rushes, 102 yds, 1 TD
- In 2007, James R rushed 50 times for 586 yds as Bernard’s back-up.

Yes, it does appear that if McCants is healthy, that he will likely get more carries than James R.

But, you can’t tell me that James R is not worth mentioning when discussion OSU’s rushing capabilities. J Rodgers, over 1,300 yds rushing and 9 TDs and over 50 carriers per season.

Silly Ducks. FYI, you can’t call me a troll because this is my site and you are the ones trollin’.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry,

my football IQ is too low to comprehend your Rules of Trolling. So, I’m off to put on my red and black checkered flannel, brush my tooth, and go menace some spotted owls. Have fun in your fantasy world.

"Seriously, baby, I can prescribe anything I want!" - Matt Daddy

by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 6, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

I grasp the concept of an All-Purpose player well enough. You are the one that is changing the point of discussion from RB to all-purpose.

Barner was special teams, and was out wide plenty last year too. He even ran a few flysweeps, and was often a pitch option. Dickson was a TE, but he played in the backfield a few times and as a receiver several times.

The James Rodgers statistics your posting only show that he’s a rushing threat. Nobody here is debating that. You’re the only one that is reiterating that. But those statistics are also misleading. Nearly every one of those rushes is off of the flysweep. OSU runs a flysweep motion on a significant number of their plays.

If I’m going to talk about OSU’s rushing capabilities, James Rodgers absolutely deserves to be in the discussion. Just like Jacquizz Rodgers deserves to be in their discussion of their passing game.

If we’re going to talk about RBs, James Rodgers is a fine WR (Arguably the best/most dangerous in the Pac-10), but he isn’t a RB.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 6, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would argue that he is an All-Purpose back

who lines up most frequently at WR. He played RB in place of the injured Quizz in 2008 against the Ducks for goodness sake. Check the tape. See where he lined up on his carries. At least a handful were in the backfield.

Agree to disagree. Let’s settle this on the field!

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mr. DFWTrojan, what you’ve just said… is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on Aug 6, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's our insanely passionate Trojan

We love him to death and, were he a Duck (sorry DFW)- you’d be proud to have him on your side.

He’s our Duck though. Dang it! Our GUY! I think he’s played and defended his argument quite admirably, it’s just that- YOU GUYS GOT HIS FEATHERS A TAD RUFFLED (damn, damn, fuck! he is not a duck, el hombre no es un pato, no es un PATO!)

See what’cha guys have gone and done to me???? I’m practically post-it-noting myself!

Pinche’ patitos!

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 6, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Reference.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 6, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

OMIGOD!

Just OMIGOD! (hee-hee-teehee!)

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 6, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

But, you're just plain wrong.

James Rodgers DOES NOT line up in the backfield… ever, ever or ever. He’s not Quizz’s primary back up, ever, or ever.

You can try and justify it with rushing stats all you want, but those come off fly sweeps and motion plays, NOT lining up in the backfield.

You’re going to have to try and change the argument again to something that ISN’T based on an untruth.

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 6, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

no true

he has lined up in the backfield. and, since when are sweeps and motion plays that are handoffs not rushing plays?

are you saying that all rushing plays from players other than Quizz and McCants are not a part of the the Beavs running game.

A rush is a rush is a rush, my fowl friend.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Please show me where ANYONE

disagreed with you on rushing game? Anywhere? Anywhere? No?

So let’s go back to the original tape:

Jared:
have the best RB unit in the Pac-10

DFW:
 "best RB unit" in the PacX – delusional

Ok, so when did best RB unit turn into a rushing yards, running play argument?

Not every person who rushes with the ball is RB. Can you NOT figure that out? And there are a ton of youtube clips out there of the 65-38 ass whooping that was the 2008 Civil War… feel free to find ONE where James Rodgers lines up in the backfield. It shouldn’t be too hard considering he rushed 5 times. One of those he must have lined up in the backfield… right? Please show me.

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 6, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Checkmate, Duck Douche Patrol
James Rodgers DOES NOT line up in the backfield… ever, ever or ever. -Matt Daddy
I’ve scoured through the internet, looking for something that shows him lining up in the backfield…..The burden of proof is on you for that. Please, show me an example. -Jared
He (James) does not carry the ball from the tailback position….James Rodgers has never spelled Jacquizz Rodgers in an NCAA football game at the tailback position. -qrsouther

Yahtzee!!! In the immortal words of Kenny Rogers, you’ve got to know when to hold ‘em, and know when to fold ’em. You feather dusters should have folded long ago. USC has a proud football tradition, and we at CC consider ourselves proud USC football aficianados. As recent football upstarts, and rather embarrassing ones at that with a piss poor OOC and Rose Bowl record, I would suggest that you Ducks spend more time following Uncle Phil’s track team at Nike U. Football is a complicated sport for big dogs only, not puppies.

The sophomore flanker (James Rodgers) put the game away for the Beavers with the 55-yard run early in the fourth quarter, taking a pitch from Moevao after lining up at tailback and motoring down the right sidelines to paydirt for a 31-6 lead.

http://www.portlandtribune.com/sports/story.php?story_id=122438195102627200

That research took my all of, oh, say, about 20 seconds. But, I did cheat, as I already knew the answer. As a cfb aficionado, I have watched James R tote the rock from the TB position many times. James is an All Purpose player who typically lines up at WR, but does occasionally line up at TB, and who carries over 50x per season averaging over 450 rushing yards per annum. Funny how you fowl farts claim to be such experts on the Beavs, when you don’t even really understand your own team.

Regardless, you just got pwnd. You are now my pet Ducks. I will call you Muddles, Puddles, and Piddles, as you are all baby ducks in the dirty pond that is Eugene.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Having actually watched that game......

It’s called a fly sweep…..they got it wrong

by ppilot on Aug 7, 2010 1:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah. I remember that game!

It was a flysweep. The Portland tribune got it wrong.

Next?

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 7, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

It was a fake hand-off to Jaquizz on the dive and a pitch to James on an end around. Still trying to find one VIDEO where James lines up in the backfield.

Wait, should I just start making up names for DFW? Would that make my argument more clear?

I’m confused on this works, I thought football discussion was about football and not name calling. Guess I was wrong D… F… W… Trojan.

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 7, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah. That was right. I remember James running in motion and cutting up field.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 7, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Whoa....wait, let me recap
they got it wrong. -puddles
The Portland tribune got it wrong. -piddles
It was a….pitch to James on an end around.

What’s this? I’m confused. Let me reread the article from the sports reporter at The Portland Tribune:

The sophomore flanker put the game away for the Beavers with the 55-yard run early in the fourth quarter, taking a pitch from Moevao after lining up at tailback and motoring down the right sidelines to paydirt for a 31-6 lead.

Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You got so pwnd!!! Is anyone going to believe a Duck over a major media sports reporter re: a Beaver game?!? Hell no! I am claiming my Duck Trophy for bagging so many ducks in one weekend. Silly, virtual pet duckies – muddles, puddles, and piddles. Not so smart, but you sure are fun to deconstruct.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 7, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

It may have been a toss, and he may have been lined up in the backfield that one play. That hardly proves anything though.

My memory of that run was either an end around or a flysweep (He’s ran so many of those damned flysweeps).

So let’s say he did line up on that play and received a toss. I still counter your claims that he is the primary backup for Jacquizz, that he has lined up at TB many times (We possibly one a single documented play).

You also need to grow up for a second. You continue to state that we aren’t including James Rodgers as part of the rushing attack. That is complete and entire bullshit, and if you read what we’ve been saying, you’d know that. We’ve been debating the terms as you originally defined them, which are running backs. OSU guys have defended this.

James is a vital part to the OSU rushing attack. Despite your wishes, no duck fan here has debated that. Take victory over this if you wish. Clearly that’s what makes you happy and helps get you off at night.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 7, 2010 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

An All Purpose Back Still Confuses You

James has lined up at TB. James has rushed for over 1,300 yrds in his career. James avgs over 50 rushes per season. James has 9 rushing TDs.

Yes, James lines up primarily at WR, and is listed as such on the roster. But, you are too stuck on convention. In the Beavs offense, James is an All Purpose player who is a key rusher. His roster position officially is WR. But, he rushes frequently and effectively. I believe the original discussion was in the context of “rushing units”, not a discussion of only players listed at RB on the roster. Because, a roster position title cannot accurately reflect the true position and play of an All Purpose back, like James in the Beavs attack.

As you dug your hole deeper, I continued to prove my every assertion with facts and data. You countered with whining and boorishness. Ducks fans have a reputation for being obnoxious, and you guys have lived up to your image perfectly.

In the finaly analysis of this debate, I win and you lose. Of course, I am a Trojan and you are a Duck, so it was implicit in the equation that I would win. FTMFW, James Rodgers lining up in the backfield:
  
7:08 Mark

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 7, 2010 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was in motion on that play.

You are wrong. Stop acting like you were ever correct. Grow up.

My yoke is heavy.

by qrsouther on Aug 8, 2010 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

OMG!! Are you blind, duck?

He was CLEARLY lined up in the backfield at TB. There is a Pause button on the media player. Use it.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 8, 2010 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I used it. I watched the play four times.

Unless before the snap he took a lunge greatly to his right and got to top speed immediately, he had to have been in motion.

I am not blind. Stop with the ad hominem attacks. That is a poor debate tactic.

My yoke is heavy.

by qrsouther on Aug 8, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Are you serious?

I’m not sure if you’re just teasing, or what…

We aren’t arguing if James Rodgers has rushed at all. NOBODY HAS. Clearly, he has!

We are debating the issue if he’s lined up in the backfield. I’ve watched a LOT of OSU football the past 3-4 years. I cannot recall a single time he lined up in the backfield. He takes hand-offs on fly sweeps and motion plays all the time. He doesn’t line up in the backfield though.

I’ve scoured through the internet, looking for something that shows him lining up in the backfield. I haven’t found anything. You claim he has. The burden of proof is on you for that. Please, show me an example.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 6, 2010 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

FYI, you can’t call me a troll because this is my site and you are the ones trollin’.

You and Lear Pilot over at UW DawgPound should just get together and have a little troll party while you still have your youth.

My yoke is heavy.

by qrsouther on Aug 6, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

James has been Quizz's primary back-up

+50 carries per season
+frequently lines up at TB when Quizz is out
+9 rushing TDs
+over 1,000 rushing yards

Players can play multiple positions. Also, QBs can run and throw, so a QB is not an RB when running; rather, he is a running QB.

Silly Confused Ducks

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who plays the “?” position

Hey Daisy, git me anudder one!
Addicted to Quack

by Matt Daddy on Aug 6, 2010 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

JShufelt's grandma is a 5* ?

"Seriously, baby, I can prescribe anything I want!" - Matt Daddy

by HoodRiverDuck on Aug 6, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm still confused about your logic.

James Rodgers is a receiver. He runs flysweeps often. He does not carry the ball from the tailback position.

James Rodgers has never spelled Jacquizz Rodgers in an NCAA football game at the tailback position, nor vice versa.

It’s not that we’re confused. It’s that you’re not making sense.

My yoke is heavy.

by qrsouther on Aug 6, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not true

James has spelled Quizz and lined up at TB quite often. Check the tape of the Beavs/Ducks in 2008.

You knoweth not of what you speak, quacker.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you can find one link of evidence of James Rodgers lining up in the backfield, please show it.

Otherwise, you’re acting extremely juvenile and pompous. If you want to act smug, worry more about being correct first.

My yoke is heavy.

by qrsouther on Aug 6, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ve watched the 2008 civil wars, probably somewhere around eight to ten times. I can practically repeat the play-by-play and color commentary of the entire game.

I’m 99% sure he didn’t line up at TB once.

Jeremy Francis saw play time in that game. In fact, he was one of the brighter spots of OSU’s offense that game with his screen passes.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 6, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Please post this on Building the Dam

My beaver friends need a laugh every once in a while.

by ppilot on Aug 7, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I went to high school with that kid in the fro

this is my signature! there are many like it but this one is mine!

by RabbitSC on Aug 6, 2010 8:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Triple Rec'd! And DblBitchSlap!

"Understanding is a virtue, hard to come by"
J. Airplane

by gnossos on Aug 4, 2010 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

DC

Consider yourself served

‎"You can't sanction heart, and you can't sanction the will to win" - USC QB, Matt Barkley

by WE ARE SC on Aug 5, 2010 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jared shared the "other schools accusing USC of cheating" remark

As it applies to Reggie Bush/Jeremiah Masoli question. And that’s been clarified.

You have a point with what was said in the COI final report as it pertains to “consultant” Pete Rodriguez. It’s my understanding that Rodriguez was a special teams consultant, not listed under any personnel staffing as a paid coach. This part is true. And it was true for half a season until it came under the purview of compliance and the NCAA. The COI did say that the Rodriguez hire was a “more than limited competitive advantage” but I ask: you tell me how it was cheating.

Let’s also be aware of the fact that Jared himself, have said the sanctions were too harsh. With that, I’ll go further. This COI had it in for USC. That’s not an excuse or to justify Coach Carroll’s decision to hire Pete Rodriguez in the first place- but, anything the COI could have hammered USC with- they looked with a fine tooth comb and ONLY REALLY FOUND THIS.

The rest of the report- Tim Floyd/OJ Mayo = NOTHING. Reggie Bush/LaMarr Griffin and New Era = they already decided on our guilt prior to the COI hearing in Jan 2010 and truly didn’t want to hear about Coach McNair’s response to his initial interview with NCAA Enforcement Staff. They concluded (Enforcement) that McNair was misleading in his answers and calculated in his responses and therefore- should not be trusted. Hence- Pete Rodriguez.

So the short answer is: yes, maybe you can call Pete Rodriguez cheating. . . .in the off-season and beginning of 2008 season. What does that have to do with Bush and all our #1 – #4 finishes in the BCS?

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

"You tell me how it was cheating."

I’ll take a stab at this question.

All NCAA D-1 programs agree to compete using a capped amount of coaches on staff. Using a paid “consultant” skirts that limit. Any such consultancy should be cleared through compliance before it is initiated, not caught in progress.

So, in a completely straight faced way, it can can be said that the arrangement with Rodriguez, whether based in charity or some other rationalization is used, was cheating, especially on a team that carried no ST coach.

You cannot say whether Rodriguez’s help enabled you to perform better on ST than you may have otherwise. In any event, the “competitive advantage” doesn’t have to be effective in order to get a program in trouble, it need only have been a corner clearly cut.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 4, 2010 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I get all that

Again, the situation where Jared used ‘cheating’ as it applies to USC was under the auspices of the question regarding Bush and Masoli. The average person doesn’t equate ‘cheating’ and USC as it applies to Rodriguez- for the most part.

However, like I wrote from above and below: this is a damning aspect of the COI report and considering it is a problem from 2008- and the fact that it equated to an advantage for a team without a special teams coach (Rodriguez was scouting/consulting for our kicking game) I don’t see how it can honestly bear out as “cheating in the slightest”. Our kicking game was gawd-awful. Either Coach Carroll picked a lemon of a coach that didn’t help out whatsoever or the COI was looking for something to put a collar on USC?

In this case, it can be both.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Really, the hook is not whether there was an advantage created.

Rather, as is rightly sensed, CPC directly circumventing the coaching cap is direct evidence of a failed or ignored compliance department at HH at the time.

That hiring of Rodriguez is going to be a very important dagger in any appeal of the LOIC charge.

To my mind the case against USC boils down this way:

Reggie got caught.
USC claimed ignorance, if not innocence.
There were opportunities to catch Bush, but the compliance department was incredibly sanguine about interrogating him about any paperwork or possession improprieties, real or perceived.
OJ Mayo was dirty before he got there.
Compliance mewled not to take him and was ignored.
Mayo’s street agent was a known problem. Nothing was done.
USC threw basketball under the bus.
The COI is after USC for it’s rather irrationally defiant stance that it couldn’t have known, nor should have known that Bush was essentially ineligible from 2004 on.

Had you a proactive compliance program, that defense might have worked. You didn’t even have a reactive compliance department at the time.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 4, 2010 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

There was no need to

We only know of an inadequate Compliance, after the fact. We don’t have a “history” of ghosts in our closet, hence- AD Garrett staffed his compliance the way he deemed it necessary.

Again, we all can get all morality on this tale AFTER THE FACT. Your very own moderators over at ATQ didn’t predict this harsh a penalty. If we would have gotten the sanctions we rightly deserved, we wouldn’t be having this conversation Canard. And as such, you wouldn’t necessarily be on such a high horse.

My most un-favorite saying these days is: It is what it is.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Let's enlighten Canard with the facts

- Pete did not circumvent the coaching cap. Rodriguez did not qualify as a coach per NCAA bylaws.
- Rodriguez is a trivial issue and should have been a secondary violation at best for attending a few practices. The Appeals Committee will likely correct the COI on this.
- Yes, USC claimed ignorance WRT Bush. To date, there still remains no hard evidence that USC knew or should have known a think. The illicit activity was 200 miles away from campus.
- What opportunities were there to “catch Bush”? Please reread the 4th and 5th Amendments in the Bill of Rights, paying special attention to the “privacy” sections.
- OJ Mayo was cleared by the NCAA and USC prior to enrolling at USC.
- USC did err in allowing Mayo’s street agent access to campus, and we self-imposed sanctions for this offense. He was not a booster, but in the NCAA’s byzantine By-Laws he is deemed a booster.
- USC did not “throw hoops under the bus.” USC discovered illicit activity re: Mayo and an agent and acted reasonably. USC did not self-impose on football because USC did little to nothing wrong.
- Please explain how USC is “irrationally defiant” WRT to the COI. Does Brian Kelly monitor the actions of all of his players families at their homes, which are typically 100s of miles away from campus?

Canard, you are simply regurgitating what you have read on ESPiN. You have no insight or understanding into what actually went down at USC. Buy a clue, brother. Don’t be another sheep in the flock. Read some Ralph Waldo and stop following the crowd.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You're on fire today buddy!

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 4, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Please reread the 4th and 5th Amendments in the Bill of Rights, paying special attention to the "privacy" sections."

You’re going to have to bust out your Cracker Jack law degree and enlighten me as to how the 4th and 5th Amendments to the United States Constitution, which bar unwarranted intrusions into one’s “privacy” by governmental entities, are in any way implicated by completely filing out a car registration form or explaining the origin of one’s huge cubic zirconia/diamond earrings, or offering up an answer to compliance as to how one’s parents are jet setting their way to bowl games—first to non-state actor USC, and then the non-governmental body called the NCAA.

Fire away.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 4, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, the ball is in your court

Please explain how USC failed in “opportunities to catch Bush” without violating his rights to privacy. The 4th amendment covers privacy of the person and possessions against unreasonable searches and the 5th Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination provides protection for the privacy of personal information.

Remember, I graduated from USC, so you are the Cracker Jack in this candy store.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

You brought up the Fourth and Fifth Amendments counselor

Now tell the world how they apply in the context of compliance at HH determining the continued eligibility of one Reginald Bush.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 5, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

You said that USC missed "opportunities to catch Bush"

Since the transgressions occurred 200 miles off campus, USC would have had to surveil, search, and depose Reggie and family in order to catch him, IMO; thereby violating his rights to privacy.

You have still failed to explain how USC negligently missed “opportunities to catch Bush.” All quack and no bill?

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 5, 2010 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't make me get on your case Canard- this you don't want, nor need

I just read your “should have known that Bush was essentially ineligible from 2004 on.”

Please explain. (I’m warning you now, you’d better do your homework buddy). Otherwise, just leave this thread alone- I promise, I won’t go lightly on this.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rodriguez should have been a secondary at best

NCAA rules prohibit consultants from “any on- or off-field . . . coaching activities.”

Rodriguez did not interact with the players at all. He was not on the sidelines at games. He was a former mentor to Pete who shared some advice. That’s it. Happens everyday.

Clue in, Canard, and don’t swallow the NCAA’s agenda hook, line and sinker.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rodriguez would have been self-reported

by a properly functioning compliance department in a program already instructed to get one while on probation for previous rules violations.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 4, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

As soon as you apply how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments prevented HH

from asking Reggie Bush any inconvenient questions that implicated his eligibility.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 5, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right back at you, puddle jumper

1) read my third comment above. way to put your foot in mouth.

2) answering a question with a question. way to make a false allegation with no support and avoid backing it up.

If you are going to run with us big dogs, you’ll need to bring some facts.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 6, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, we didn't.

And that adage doesn’t work in that context, either…

My yoke is heavy.

by qrsouther on Aug 6, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

You realize that analogy doesn't work at all in this situation, right?

And you never actually answered his question, just responded with personal attacks.

by ppilot on Aug 7, 2010 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

He never answered my question, which was the original question

you do realize that now, don’t you. or, do you need me to draw you a picture.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 7, 2010 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

YOUR a ASSHAT plain and simple, maybe you should just GO

So Fight On USC followers and Don’t worry WE Will Still Play on Saturdays and Bowls will come later, for WE ARE SC not That other Softball University. Oh and don’t say you now have a baseball team, it’s not Real Baseball unless you use Wooden Bats

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 6, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Poor pp

did that mean ole So Cal hurt little pp’s feelings

‎"You can't sanction heart, and you can't sanction the will to win" - USC QB, Matt Barkley

by WE ARE SC on Aug 7, 2010 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

On a lighter note:

Canard, that was a good one- and you don’t know how much this particular Coach Carroll misstep is gonna affect the upcoming NCAA Appeals process as it pertains to our sanctions. My lawyer buddies are telling me this Pete Rodriguez situation with regards to the COI final report will be the linchpin in keeping ALL SANCTIONS intact and our efforts to repeal some of the aspects of the COI final report will be all for naught based solely on this Rodriguez insertion in the COI final report.

I dare must, agree with that assessment. Our appeal is an uphill battle to begin with, this Rodriguez comment will cement the COI’s findings and the Appeals Board will probably side with them and deny USC.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's common practice

How many outside coaches visited your program in the last year? How other programs did Chip Kelly visit? How many phone calls were made to Chip to ask him questions about his offense? How many phone calls and emails did Chip and staff send to other coaches/consultants at other programs sharing information and asking questions?

Every program interacts with other coaches. USC got caught in a technicality by the Evil Empire.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would have liked to answer Canard with this. . . .

. . . .but I didn’t want to be perceived as diminishing this damning aspect of the COI final report.

(You ask, if Rodriguez hire was not cheating what was it? Here’s the answer: It was Pete Carroll hiring an old friend and still mentor who ended up living in the LA area and was out of work. Pete’s hiring of this long time friend past the USC Compliance smell test, but didn’t pass the Enforcement smell test and as such- the NCAA opened up an inquiry after being tipped off by a rival. Rodriguez was immediately taken off payroll and USC opened up an internal investigation and did most, if not all the leg work for NCAA Enforcement. NCAA Enforcement sent 1 person twice to USC in order to vet any outstanding questions and/or get any hard evidence/information in order to complete it’s findings. We did the investigation, NCAA did the determinations.

That’s what is was.)

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Apples and Oranges

Coaches inviting one another over to compare notes in the off season or holding and attending clinics on their own time and dime have exactly nothing to do with hiring an NFL buddy, using money from the AD, to analyze an aspect of a team’s performance in season.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 4, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comparing notes is comparing notes

coaching is coaching. again, there was no coaching. Rodriguez did not meet with players, was not on the sidelines, etc. Just another former colleague comparing notes with Pete.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comparing notes for CASH.

That’s why it was trouble. Doing QA work for pay is coaching.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Aug 4, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

To DFWTrojan and my CC brothers

I just want to say, I’m happy and proud to be a part of Conquest Chronicles. My adulation of the things JShufelt wrote on this post of Joey’s is not a knock on any of what’s been written by you (DFW) at all. JShufelt’s hilarity, I feel, was comical to the 10th power and his rebuttal to your comment was pure humor at it’s best. It’s great that JShufelt wasn’t untoward nor vindictive to you specifically- and I just wanted to put this out there that I love what you bring to the table here DFW, and my praise of JShufelt was in no way me siding with JShufelt’s comments- just laughing along with his humorous disposition.

(i just thought i’d put this out there, to let you – DFW – and others know where my head is at with all this. cool?)

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 10:18 PM PDT reply actions  

+1, I found it humorous too, yet still far afield from the context

a little levity is always appreciated. if you live in an area surrounded by logging camps with rain 350 days a year, you’d better be able find humor in situations.

Death to the NCAA!!!

by DFWTrojan on Aug 4, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dude!

THAT SHIT’S FROM WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY LEFT FIELD- hence, my reply “I thought I was Bix?” (i honestly haven’t read any commenter anywhere near my haziness! i’m lucky if i’m relevant from time to time. i’m shooting for consistency, at least)

Thanks for understanding.

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 4, 2010 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 4, 2010 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Loco? What's your frequency?

I’d love to read what you’ve written Maestro, but- I got nothing. Bubkis, nada, zilch!

Your comment reads:

“Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera”

Yup, that’s it! (La falla de funcionamiento del teclado? Quiere usted repitir lo que dijo, por favor?)

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 5, 2010 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ay caramba!

Well, it was near midnight and it involved black russians, the look on the chick below and the guy in the green outfit and how lovely Ducks fans are. Not clever enough to be worth remembering but I can’t remember you using props like this in any of your loquacious meanderings. Bottom line is you give too much credit to that duck feather duster.
Wtf is the great ape in the back doing to that unfortunate little tree hugger? Looks like what he’s givin’ she don’t want!

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 5, 2010 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Duck feather duster?

These are reasons we I feel like we get along so well! Your compliments truly out due your handsomeness.

it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-R-E-A-K-I-N-H-E-R-O-U-T-M-A-N"

by JShufelt on Aug 5, 2010 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

I see what you're doing there

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 5, 2010 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Busco Chongo?

The dude with the O-coconut-tits is channeling his Danger Island character- Chongo.

(Banana Splits Adventure Hour show- my brother’s favorite. He got a huge stack of beta-max’s and a machine that still works from some cousins in Chile. They sent ‘em to him because the machine was in his old room at my Tata’s house. They also sent him this old-school poster of actual pictures of Bobby Bonds, McCovey, Chris Speier, Tito Fuentes, and Juan Marichal. Tells you how ancient my brother is)

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 5, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm, that would make him at least 10 years younger than so.cal.!
Btw, for those that are wondering about Tata (he ain’t talking about his titty), it’s the Spanish version or “gramps” or grandfather.

Salve Caesar Augustus Kiffinus!
Ad astra per aspera

by M. AGRIPPA on Aug 5, 2010 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

There's nothing like getting in trouble, . . . . .

. . . .by way of a fellow Latino! (You got me!!!!! That’s why you’re the Maestro)

Sorry SoCal, I didn’t mean anything by the “ancient” remark. I’m trying to poke fun at someone else, and thanks to Loco- (thanks Loco!) I inadvertently showed my immaturity.

Dang! I gotta go get me some maturity.

"Fun fact: My grandma actually had 7 carries for 79 yards and one TD last year against Stanford. The (Oregon Ducks) spread option just works like that, but it helped that she’s pretty scrappy" (JShufelt- Addicted to Quack)

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 5, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would someone......

Please unruffle Canard’s feathers -—- quack quack. He is repeating himself like Daffy Duck – oh.

by trojanarchitect on Aug 5, 2010 3:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Well I can't believe Oregon has a chance in hell to win pac-10 this year now that Masoli. is gone.

Good luck tough but I still think it will be Cal or Zona.

So Fight On USC followers and Don’t worry WE Will Still Play on Saturdays and Bowls will come later, for WE ARE SC not That other Softball University. Oh and don’t say you now have a baseball team, it’s not Real Baseball unless you use Wooden Bats

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 6, 2010 12:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines

Managers

Images_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan