LaMichael James Gets Some Jail Time; Kelly Hands Out Punishments
On February 17, Oregon running back LaMichael James was arrested on charges of domestic violence, yet the all-American tailback immediately proclaimed his innocence, prompting head coach Chip Kelly to postpone any serious punishment until all of the "facts were presented." However, as of this afternoon, it remains evident that some form of reprehension will be in store for James, as the freshman running back was sentenced to ten days in jail after pleading guilty misdemeanor harassment. Whether he actually spends any time in jail is one thing, but his plea further embarrasses himself and the university, which will likely prompt Kelly to take further action. From ESPNLosAngeles.com:
James, who appeared in Lane County Circuit Court on Friday morning, will then spend 24 months on probation as part of the plea agreement with prosecutors.
He must report to jail on Friday afternoon, but it was unclear whether he would serve any time.
Deputy District Attorney Alex Gardner said jail time was up to the Lane County Sheriff's Department, which would likely place James in a diversion program instead because of overcrowding.
James, who set a Pac-10 freshman record with more than 1,500 yards rushing last season, originally faced five misdemeanor charges, including menacing, strangulation and assault. All but the harassment charge were dropped.
James was in court with his attorney for the hearing before Judge Maurice K. Merten, which lasted just a little more than five minutes. The running back left the courtroom without comment.
In a statement that was included in court documents related to the case, James apologized to the victim, a former girlfriend. She claimed he grabbed her neck and pushed her to the ground during an argument on Feb. 15.
"I hope to put this matter behind me now and learn from it. I have made a mistake and accept the consequences," the statement said. "I look forward to demonstrating to my university, to my team and to the community that I am a better man than recent events suggest."
Kelly has received a lot of flack this offseason for the way he has handled all the arrests and police run-ins by his players, but in reality, what is he supposed to do? It's impossible for a college coach, in this day and age, to constantly monitor an entire roster of 18-22 year-old athletes. It's just not going to happen. However, it is essential for a coach such as Kelly to react swiftly and appropriately when such a misfortune event does occur.
Has Kelly done that in this instance? I'm not so sure. James has yet to be fully punished, and nothing has been done with starting quarterback Jeremiah Masoli, who is actually set to appear in court later today on an unrelated felony burglary charge. If Kelly eventually takes action against the Ducks' two most high-profiled players, then he will certainly deserve some credit. However, if he lets Masoli and James off free, while booting others off the roster, a lot more questioned will be raised than answers will be provided.
More Updates after the jump:
Update #1:
SB Nation's very own Addicted To Quack has some new information on Masoli:
Jeremiah Masoli was also in court, and plead guilt to misdemeanor second degree burglary. The plea bargain kept the conviction as a misdemeanor, and Masoli will face 12 months probation and 140 hours of community service, and will need to pay over $5,000 in restitution within 10 days.
Unfortunately, Masoli's outlook as part of the Oregon football team is much more unclear. If he lied previously to Coach Kelly regarding these events, you can be sure that he will feel the full repercussions.
Update #2
At his press conference this afternoon, Chip Kelly announced that he would suspend James for the season opener against New Mexico, a team that went 1-11 a year ago, while further suspending Masoli, who still has a redshirt available, for the entire 2010 season.
ATQ recently addressed Kelly's decision:
With all the speculation that has been happening over the past few weeks, I think that these punishments are fair. James and Beard made mistakes, and when presented with poor situations, made the wrong decisions.
Jeremiah Masoli's crime was much more premeditated, and he reportedly broke Chip Kelly's number one rule: he lied to the coach. I'm honestly surprised he wasn't entirely kicked off the team, though I support the University standing by the student-athletes and helping them compete their education.
All three players will have unspecified goals they will need to meet to earn full reinstatement. I don't imagine that James or Beard will have problems with that, but Masoli will have a long road ahead.
For now, this seems to bring for a close a fairly hectic time for Oregon football, though I'm happy with the response of the University. I'm confident that the players know their will be consequences for their actions, and hope that will affect their behavior. Here's hoping they can keep a low profile over the next few months.
Off the bat, I don't have any major objections regarding the severity of Kelly's punishments. As of right now, it appears as if Masoli was more than fairly reprimanded, as there is still no guarantee that he even suits up for the Ducks in 2011. However, it does appear as the suspension for James may be a little "light," especially in lieu of his recent guilty plea. Anyway, that's my take. What are your thoughts?
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Meh...
Not surprising with the legal system the way it is in this country…everyone seems to get a second chance.
That is a “them” problem…
"Mention USC to a Bruin and they get angry; mention UCLA to a Trojan and they laugh."
Thought this was strike two for Masoli
He was convicted of 2 armed robberies as a minor. So technically this is his third chance if he gets to play again.
For those interested
Kelly is holding a press conference to discuss Masoli, James, and other “run-ins”
--Conquest Chronicles, SBNation's USC Trojans blog
But apparently he won't be answering questions
I guess he’s using Mike Garrett as the model for PR.
--Conquest Chronicles, SBNation's USC Trojans blog
by Joey Kaufman on Mar 12, 2010 3:03 PM PST up reply actions
James suspended for the opener; Masoli for the entire season
--Conquest Chronicles, SBNation's USC Trojans blog
Was it ever that open?
Oregon were the favorites, but how far apart? USC, UW, Stanford, and to a lesser extent Arizona are capable of beating Oregon’s team this season.
by Julio Nievas on Mar 12, 2010 4:57 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
James just suspended for opener is questionable
I knew Kelly would suspend him, but I thought for 2 games. Masoli I guess fits the bill. Hey P, I’m curious to know why you believed these guys would be handed oit light punishments?
by Julio Nievas on Mar 12, 2010 4:53 PM PST via mobile reply actions
James' punishment only seems light
because of the allegations of the case (possibly strangled his girlfriend, at least pushed her down, roughing her up some). But all charges except a misdemeanor harassment charge were dropped, so a one game suspension for misdemeanor harassment isn’t that light-handed, but it certainly could have been more; less would have been unacceptable.
In any case, Oregon’s spring practice just heated up with QB competition!
This is an enlightening read about what went down
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/0174_001.pdf
They had a fight, tempers flared, it got a little physical, but from the description, it doesn’t sound like the victim was in real physical danger. A one game suspension for what actually happened is not too light, but you also have to consider the PR damage done to the program.
Chip Kelly has had an unenviable job this off season, but he’s done a decent job under pressure.
Seems like a light punishment
Kelly seems to have taken advantage of the plea bargain terminology to hand out a light punishment. While I take charges by the police with a grain of salt, the DA and judge thought it bad enough to warrant serious charges and restrictions. I don’t agree that Kelly has done a good job under pressure off the field. Not suspending James and Masoli were huge mistakes, going on the radio and declaring him innocent was even bigger. Letting Blount back in was a mistake, and kicking off that LB for a DUI and Holland for a twitter seem overreactions.Now word is he says James was on some double secret probation all the time, he was just keeping it secret from everyone else. Tell me that isn’t the actions of a fool.
by ev on Mar 13, 2010 8:22 AM PST up reply actions
Holland has multiple offenses
according to Bellotti. The facebook stuff was just the final straw. So there is no Masoli for 2010. Will he be able to regain his starting job if his replacement does well this year?
Kelly primarily wants to keep his team intact as much as possible without seeming like a total wimp on the discipline. He will expel you if he can afford it, but James and Masoli are too important to throw away.
Masoli has two prior convictions for armed robbery. Now a burglary conviction has come up. Is this kid going to really change, or are the Ducks waiting for him to hit strike 3?
Coach Kelly can sure coach, we're finding out what type of leader he'll be
Let’s face it, there isn’t a blueprint for being an “uber-coach”! Some think Coach Pete Carroll is close to it, for college football players- but even still, Coach Carroll has just as many detractors as he ever had fans.
We witnessed a juggernaut of an offense in Coach Kelly’s first year as head coach of the Ducks, but now we’re finding out what kind of leadership characteristics he’ll employ to set the stage for what his program will be built upon and the legacy he’ll leave behind. It’s been one arrest after another for him this off-season. It’s bad enough players will leave through graduation and draft- but to have your ENTIRE BACKFIELD on offense get blown to smithereens???
I’m not familiar enough with the Duck depth chart to make any guesses as to what their offense will look like next year without Masoli and James (Blount, gone!). And to be honest, I don’t think Coach Kelly liked entertaining that idea either. James getting a one game suspension seems almost like a “token” punishment in light of Masoli being suspended for a year. But it is what it is. What would be a more “reasonable” punishment for James? And why? Would it benefit the school or football program in any way for James to be suspended for 3 games? Half a year? More?
It’s obvious that things in Eugene have kinda gotten outta hand this off-season. The reasons for which, being both understandable and mysterious.
Coach Kelly’s offensive philosophy is predicated on a quick-thinking QB, punishingly-fast RB’s, great blocking and pass-catching TE’s, and well-conditioned lineman. He’s lost his ideal QB, he just made sure to keep his “options” open when it comes to the RB’s.
If James was suspended for any longer, Oregon’s pre-conference season would probably end up worse than it did last year. Not having Masoli for the whole year is a big ginormous loss. I’m not entirely sure how Coach Kelly is going to re-coup those reps, yards, points, and victories without a badass like Masoli.
I agree that Coach Kelly’s leadership this off-season has been somewhat questionable. But, he’s only in his first year at Oregon. He’s only doing what he feels is right for his team, the university, and his chances at continued success in Pac 10 football. If anything, he could sure use a top-notch “PR-makeover” on his staff. What he really needs? Refresher courses on inter-personal relations, dealing with the media, and ethics. Not that he is severely deficient in any of these areas, he just needs to be kept abreast on the latest information and teaching tools unique to those studies.
Coach Kelly’s grades:
Coaching: A
Leadership: B-
Communication: C-
Overall: C+
"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}
by BixBeiderbecke on Mar 13, 2010 9:33 AM PST up reply actions
Per Shelley Smith
Masoli may have received a much harsher punishment because he repeatedly denied the allegations to Oregon. Maybe James was honest about what happened. Lying to your coach on such a serious matter does deserve major punishment.
I read somewhere, thought nothing of it- at first. . . .
. . . .and now, I’m perplexed? Rumor, apparently, has it that while Masoli & his Mo’ were thievin’. . . .they were actually “almost” caught, but alas- were able to elude capture by @ 2 – 3 frathouse roomates giving the 2 “DuckDawgz” an epic chase and huntdown.
I believe Masoli & Mo were apprehended at a later time after the alleged burgle. (is that a word again? i forgot? seems right. . . )
So I ask, what is up with Slangin’-Gunslinger? Is he daft? What “type” of twistin’ is goin’ on inside that boy, Masoli’s, NOGGIN? (news flash Electric-geetar-boy: it’s ACTUALLY NOT a very good idea to bargain trust with the Coach that will make you a MILLIONAIRE! c’mon Ace! that’s so unironic. i’m unpleased!). . . . . . Why the fuck did he fuck up like he did?
He’s gotta be into Hyphy? Or something? For, reals- cause I’m serious.
"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}
by BixBeiderbecke on Mar 13, 2010 10:56 PM PST up reply actions
I read something
that Masoli and the other guy were asked to leave the frat, and that the response was to steal a few items. Maybe Masoli and the other guy were trying to get back at the frat guys for throwing them out of a party.
So, he ain't "hyphy"?
What kind of a duncebucket is this chap? The “I-got-a-hairy-red-beard-so-I-can-do-whatever-the-fuck?” kind of duncebucket? Playa be rollin’!
(fwiw: “Hyphy” is a type of rap or . . . .condition which makes one super-aggressive and excitable. Here. it was the “in-thing” to see and be . . . . .back in 2008. ???)
"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}
by BixBeiderbecke on Mar 14, 2010 8:39 AM PST up reply actions
(it's times like this, when I can use a, "say something cool right now" token)
As it is, I just hope to not to say anything cliche, irrelevant, or hyper-defensive.
I dig on rap music, maybe not as much or as passionate as some hardcore super-in-to-it rap music lovers, but. . . .? My tastes for the various sub-genre’s of rap music is comparable to that of Country & Western-style music- in that my passion for either of them are highly specific and practically limited to certain blocks of time, as far as when the song was released.
I can’t really stand the music of Puff Daddy, or 50 Cent, candy-ass gangsta shit, and most all Top 50-popRap. The whole “party-hearty” frat-boy rap totally is NOT my cup o’tea. (put it this way- back in my day. . . . .i couldn’t stand the Beastie Boys. Weird? Not really, I just was at an age where I could not and would not have any interest in exploring them, much less pay good-money to buy one of their cd’s. the Beastie are cool with me now, though. I liked Alphabet Soup, Mos Def, TribeCalledQuest, Slum Village, Wu, Nas, DMX, – favorite all-time: NWA.
Not into Kenny Chesney, but way down with Vince Gill or Robert Earl Keen or Dwight Yoakum. Never really a Faith Hill fan, but majorly retarded for EmmyLou Harris, Loretta Lynn, Trisha Yearwood. (don’t get me started on Bluegrass. . . . . .)
"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}
by BixBeiderbecke on Mar 14, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
My comment was made with tongue “semi-permanently placed in cheek,” with two sons, ages 21 and 17, I have endured, listened to, enjoyed “rap”, although when they were younger and we were driving in the car the caveat was one rap song was equaled by one classical cut, it took them a very short time to figure out that classical “cuts” could go on forever! That being said I do enjoy some of the more melodic “rap” songs.
KUSC, of course? Right, my man?
You’re too kind, as a father. I’m mental these days, because my mom and dad were Music-Loving-Nazis!!!! What’s worse? They respectively liked totally different genres of music. The good news? My musical-conditioning was vast, eclectic, and non-stop.
Your sons didn’t have to sit through Edith Piaf, or The Mormon Tabernacle Choir, did they? Heck, I’ll even put Mac Davis and Englebert Humperdink in with those other wacky favorites my parents made us listen to.
Listening to a Berlioz number in traffic, or Tosca on a Sunday morning reading the paper and drinking coffee will always be favorite pastime for me.
"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}
by BixBeiderbecke on Mar 14, 2010 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions
KUSC of course!
No, no Edith or the Choir. My parents were into the usual, Sinatra, Martin, Williams, Davis and they liked their Humperdink of course. My brother and I were very fortunate to experience the Rat Pack several times at the Sands Hotel with my parents, those were the days.
My musical tastes run the gamut, from Blue Cheer, Frank Zappa, Acid Rock, the Blues, Jazz at Concerts by the Sea in Hermosa beach to the Velvet Gentleman, Erik Satie and the Dark Side of the Moon, throw in a little Rhapsody in Blue (the full version) and I’m set.
Never been to a shrink but Music has always been my therapist, now augmented by massive doses of Golf. Have you ever read any Dan Jenkins? Peace.
not only that, they said he probably wont serve a day of it didnt they?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
gotta love the priorities in oregon...
-assault someone… 1 game suspension
-steal some stuff… you have to take your redshirt year
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
i read the documentation from the court case and remove my objection to the james case... masoli though... dirtbag
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
2 armed robbery prior convictions as a minor
plus 1 burglary conviction
says to me not much has changed in the morals department.
Yeah...prior offender
"Mention USC to a Bruin and they get angry; mention UCLA to a Trojan and they laugh."

by 








