Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

UPDATED: Some interesting parallels between Reggie Bush and LaMichael James

Edit at the end - Paragon...

I have said before that I am not into conspiracy theories.

I don't have time to try and figure some things out, but when something stands out like a sore thumb you have to take notice and make your opinion known.

I pretty much ignored the LaMichael James Range Rover thing that popped up on the grid a while back.

I guess you could say that with all the other issues that have been reported (UNC, Cam etc.) I just wasn't interested in following another scandal, but then this article came up the other day.

It's why I cringed when I heard that Brown loaned James an $18,000 Land Rover, even as Brown claims he doesn't have enough money to buy a pair of blue jeans. And why I shook my head when I heard that James adopted a pit bull and keeps it at Brown's residence in Portland during the college football season. 

And it's why I wondered why James would take the risk of associating with Brown as a source familiar with the NCAA investigation explained that the questions from the NCAA weren't limited to that Land Rover car swap, but also about $9,000 that was sitting in James' bank account. 

"It's my understanding that the money is said to come from an inheritance after his grandmother's death, but there is no paper trail," the source said. "If it was an inheritance, it wasn't handled correctly." 

Let me make one thing VERY clear...I am not bagging on LaMichael James. While he has had some brushes with the law, it is also clear that he has overcome much in his short life.

I just see some other issues with this situation...or parallel's in my eyes.

Star-divide

If you remember, one of the glaring issues with the NCAA's punishment of USC was their claim that because Reggie Bush didn't provide any receipts that would clear him, they explicitly mentioned that Reggie Bush's inability or unwillingness to produce receipts was proof of his guilt.  

Never mind the fact that Lloyd Lake, his sister, mother, or brother-in-law could not produce one receipt, bank statement, or canceled check to support their allegations. Matter of fact, Lake's sister claims she gave him $5000 for Reggie's car, and Lloyd claimed she gave him $13,000. That major discrepancy didn't seem to matter to the NCAA, though. Based on the Lake clan testimony they basically said Reggie was guilty as charged.

Lake's sister claimed she just happened to have' $5000 in loose cash around the house, which was the reason why she couldn't produce a bank statement to show any withdrawal made in that amount.

I guess the Lake clan just lived in the lap of luxury and had wads of cash just laying around...

Now, I know Oregon fans have a general loathing for Canzano, he has pissed them off in the past but he does make some interesting points with regards to LaMichael James' "uncle".

-- NCAA bylaws are pretty clear. In order for a pre-existing relationship to exist, LMJ needed to have met this "uncle" before Oregon began recruiting him.

-- Just why does James' high school coach ask his "uncle" to watch out for him if Oregon hadn't been recruiting him?

-- Inheritances generally have to go through probate before distributions are disbursed. Probate, of course, provides a paper trail. At the very least, James should be able to provide either the probate papers or bank statements that showed this money was deposited in his account at or near the time of her death.

Oregon Head Coach Chip Kelly makes an interesting observation via text...

Kelly, via text message Thursday night, said of Brown, "I don't think he's a mentor, just a would-be friend."

Really?

Isn't that what some called Lloyd Lake of Reggie Bush?

Here is a more interesting question...

Remember Joe McKnight's Range Rover issue? We still haven't heard anything about that...Yet the NCAA cleared James and his "car issue" without question within the blink of an eye.

On the surface James' case is more troublesome...the car he got was from a mysterious "uncle". McKnight was suspended because he was driving his girlfriends car.

So why the apparent double standard?

I am not prepared to call James dirty, nor I am saying that Oregon is guilty of anything but the information that Canzano puts forth in this article should give one pause...especially when it comes to the apparent double standard that the NCAA is operating under.

The NCAA was very clear that USC "should have known"...should have known what has always been the big question. If USC should have known the financials of Bush's parents then should Oregon have known just where that money came from for the used Range Rover? (see edit below) Money that was supposedly "loaned" to James by an "uncle" who really isn't an "uncle" and who didn't know James until after Oregon recruited him. There is no wiggle room here in the NCAA's bylaws.

Is it also safe to say that James is a high profile player on a high profile team?

Is this selective enforcement of the rules or has the NCAA all of a sudden lost its thirst to enforce their rules when questionable scenarios arise?

The NCAA has really painted themselves into a corner here.

How do you explain that?

Even more interesting is that this news certainly provides an interesting scenario never before seen in collegiate sports. We currently have two teams preparing to play for the national championship, who's top players have an aura of receiving extra benefits that could possibly nullify all of their programs accomplishments this year.

Chew on that for a while...

EDIT - Paragon: I make a mistake that was pointed out by a friend that I need to correct.

The SUV and the $9000 are two separate issues.

James traded his 2000 Mustang with his uncle in exchange for a 2003 Range Rover. He claimed he was being stalked by someone who continued to leave notes on his window.

The blue book value of the Mustang is $5000, while the blue book value of the Range Rover is $17,500.

That's called an extra benefit, which is secondary in nature, but one that requires the student athlete to be declared ineligible and to seek reinstatement by the NCAA, pending a donation made to the charity of LMJ's choice for the difference in renting a 2000 Mustang and a 2003 Range Rover.

The $9000 is brand-new information when coupled with the previous discrepancies we are now learning about in regards to when this relationship began, and the subsequent arrest of Brown, serves as one more suspicious layer to this entire ordeal.

Brown has previous arrests for drug dealing, along with a wife and six children to support. It's highly unlikely to me that income earned as a gang intervention specialist could support a family of that size... even in Oregon.

Maybe Brown is scratching James' back right now with the intent, understanding, an agreement to be repaid when James hits the NFL...

Who knows at this point...that is all speculation.

But if you connect the dots........

More important to me is this. It is clear that the NCAA does not have the will or temerity to thoroughly investigate this entire story.

I am just not seeing it, but I hope I'm wrong.

They opened up a can of worms with USC and now all the cockroaches are being exposed. They little if now idea just how bad things are in the sport and the dropped the hammer and set a precedent that is already being questioned.

It is going to get interesting in the coming months.....

Comment 21 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

En fuego, Para!

I maintain that Reggie Bushgate was primarily the result of an overzealous Yahoo Sports based in Cali. Had USC not been the pseudo-NFL team in LA, and had been located out of state, there would not have been a media outlet with the resources to dig into Bushes background for 4 years.

James may never be properly investigated because of his remoteness in Eugene. As we saw on the SMU documentary, the NCAA relies on the media to do the dirty investigative work for them.

We must publicize this issue. Maybe James is on the up and up, but the issue clearly hasn’t been scrutinized to a reasonable level.

You can't put sanctions on the fkn endzone! Bowls are for salad!

by DFWTrojan on Dec 11, 2010 11:42 PM PST reply actions  

What happened to

elite players require elite monitoring. We never followed up on Reggie’s car, and we were punished for it. Is Oregon following up on the inheritance? The “elite monitoring” mandate from the NCAA opens a giant can of worms for everyone. Good luck enforcing that mandate. Any elite player that isn’t caught is going to demand a very good excuse from the university as to why they didn’t discover it. Maybe the universities need to hire P.I.s to watch over all of their elite, poor athletes to make sure that they do not take gifts.

by frak on Dec 12, 2010 11:07 AM PST reply actions  

No one is purported to be trying to represent James

and that is the key difference between his case and Bush’s. How that rather large distinction escapes you is rather unsurprising.

Oregon reported the Range Rover situation and began a self-investigation. A functioning compliance department existing at Oregon being another key difference in the two cases. As for Eugene being in the sticks, the NCAA flew in investigators to look into the matter as soon as it was reported.

As for the inheritance, such things happen all of the time, especially amongst the lower economic classes where people frequently die intestate and no one files anything with the courts. James lived alone in his deceased grandmother’s house for nearly two years before completing high school. That was a de facto inheritance of all of her possessions, loose cash, whatever, if there were no other legal claimants asserting rights to the deceased woman’s estate. Liquidating her possessions and whatnot before leaving Texas could have easily raised a paltry $9,000.00 without a proper paper trail and no one in all of officialdom would care without a disputant coming onto the scene.

The collegiate football world should be incensed by the Cam Newton case, where cash was admitted to being solicited by Cecil Newton. However, just because one solicits cash, it doesn’t follow that the same individual is willing to receive it. Snort.

Roses Ain't Orange!

by Canard on Dec 12, 2010 12:40 PM PST reply actions  

You make the perfect argument for selective enforcement

no point in trying to change your mind…

The McKnight comparison alone should raise eyebrows of rational observers

by Paragon SC on Dec 12, 2010 1:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Can you tell us "who" was purported to represent Bush?

If you say a convicted felon, tell me how is he EVER going to get an agents license or anything remotely resembling any sort of certification denoting such qualifications? Is he or was he not, “just a friend”? And did Lake or Michaels represent Bush in any matters before the NCAA, insofar as being a middle-man? If so, how and when?

The reason USC didn’t “self-report” anything is because all this took place away from campus and they didn’t know a thing until AFTER the Yahoo report. They then did IN FACT self-report- it didn’t take the NCAA to investigate first. They acted responsibly ONCE allegations came to surface. Do you know of any other timeline of events or scenario that would dispute what I’m claiming right now in this comment?

"Every rock that someone threw at me, I just used as a steppingstone." (Allen Bradford USC Tailback aka: "B-Rad"- Conquest Chronicles)

by BixBeiderbecke on Dec 12, 2010 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Representation 100% irrelevant

For purposes of punishment, NCAA deemed payments from agents and payments from boosters as equivalent. If someone paid, it doesn’t matter who or why, as long as ‘because you are a football player’ is the reason.

"I have a commanding voice." - Ed Orgeron

by RabbitSC on Dec 12, 2010 9:21 PM PST up reply actions  

that is the key difference between his case and Bush’s

Inappropriate benefits are inappropriate benefits regardless of the source. Plenty of SC folks looked at Bush’s situation and thought, “well hell, those weren’t intended to keep him around, surely the NCAA will take that into account.” They did not.

And in any case, the more immediate parallel was between McKnight and James… and in both cases, the respective compliance departments acted, but the urgency to clear McKnight was non-existent.

Don’t get me wrong, this all seems like small potatoes by comparison to Cam Newton. Nonetheless, we’re entitled to look at the NCAA, who laid out pretty well uncompromising standards for the SC sanctions, and wonder precisely how it is that they see white when most others see some shade of gray.

"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea"

by DC Trojan on Dec 12, 2010 9:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

The fact he wasn’t trying to represent James is meaningless. You could argue the point it’s worse as boosters use to be considered worse than agents.

by ev on Dec 13, 2010 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Your snort is directed in the wrong direction

I’m truly sorry if you cannot see the analogy, its seems more likely you are just defending your team, I would do the same. I hope for your sake the NCAA does not get any friskier with regard to these allegations, we are simply pointing out that they are not at all dissimilar. Lake et al never actually represented Bush in any capacity — they just sought to. Reggie’s car was worth about the same as that Rover for Mustang trade. That was nice spin on the 9k but prove it wasn’t given to him by his “uncle”. That’s what the NCAA asked of USC. Was his grandmother related to Lake’s family — if so why do they keep so much cash lying around? You guys are lucky — people here are pointing out the NCAA’s hypocracy not trying to get Oregon in trouble.

by ilium55 on Dec 13, 2010 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

You realize that you are linking to a John Canzano article, right?

To say the guy has absolutely no credibility in the eyes of Blazer, Beaver, and Duck would be an understatement.

by ppilot on Dec 12, 2010 4:59 PM PST reply actions  

I laugh in your general direction!

People have told us, on more occasions than I care to remember, about “shooting the messenger”.

You guys are taking USC’s place in many facets of “this game”, brah. And, . . . . .a good rendition of it too, I might add!

"Every rock that someone threw at me, I just used as a steppingstone." (Allen Bradford USC Tailback aka: "B-Rad"- Conquest Chronicles)

by BixBeiderbecke on Dec 12, 2010 5:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Although Scott Wolf has never driven a coach’s wife to assault. <3 you Colleen Belotti!

"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea"

by DC Trojan on Dec 12, 2010 9:31 PM PST up reply actions  

John Canzano

Makes much of the greater-LA area media look rational, well-meaning, and competent.

"I have a commanding voice." - Ed Orgeron

by RabbitSC on Dec 12, 2010 9:20 PM PST up reply actions  

The NCAA is completely incapable of taking the exact type of decisive action

that it hammered USC for not taking. It has never been alleged that USC provided any improper benefits to Reggie Bush…only that USC should have known about Bush’s benefits and declared him ineligible. Failure to do that has cost USC two years of bowl eligibility and 30 scholies.

But…what type of decisive action did the NCAA and Auburn take when they became aware of Cam Newton soliticiting “pay-for-play”? They knew about the MSU allegations almost a year ago! If the press hadn’t broken the story, I doubt we’d ever have heard about it. Things were moving slower than snail’s pace until the press asked, “Wat up?”. And then they still could not take decisive action for an obvious violation. Auburn in their championship season has done a perfect Alfred E. Neumann, “What, me worry?”

And now the NCAA and Oregon (in their championship year, too) is amazingly unable to connect the dots when their star player has some serious explaining to do. And this has been an issue for months! All season long! No action.

And Florida in 1996-9 let 6+ Gators over 3 years take monthly payments (and cars) from an agent who had a runner in the UF locker room (that Florida found out about), and UF didn’t “discover” anything until after all the players had graduated, notwithstanding an open investigation during the season. That’s right…ongoing investigation before the bowl game, but they let the guys play out the season and then determined that they were taking benefits afterwards (when it wasn’t even against the rules anymore). How convenient? What decisive action!

So USC…gets banned from bowls for a two years…because USC played in two bowl games with Bush…and one of the bowl games is as follows: 1. Lloyd Lake, who the NCAA determined to be credible throughout their investigation, claims he gave Bush a car in Spring 2005. 2. USC produces a form (completed 8/05) that states that Bush’s car was bought in December 2004 3. NCAA decides Lake is wrong (the only time they concluded this) and the form is right…the car must have been bought in December 2004 4. Further, USC should have imediately recognized this as an improper benefit and suspended Bush 5. Failure to do so should cost USC a BCS title and one (of the two) year bowl ban. Basically, USC is hammered for failing to identify the gift of the car which the NCAA can’t even say for certain wasn’t provided until 4 or 5 months after they are holding USC accountable for it. If it is reasonable to expect that of USC, then how come Auburn, Oregon, and the NCAA are OK to bury their heads in the sand when a similar situation arises. Actually, the situations aren’t similar at all. The Auburn and Oregon situations have been OUT THERE ALL SEASON. So…what exactly are schools supposed to do…and when? Does it depend on the school and who sits on the committee. Sure seems so. If not, NCAA explain it please.

by TrojanJAG on Dec 13, 2010 5:12 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

for the life of me, I cannot figure out why

a 10 year old Chevy Caprice — with a maximum value of 10k (if you are being ripped off) should raise eyebrows.

by ilium55 on Dec 13, 2010 6:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Most of those so called "impala SS" Caprices

are really just old unmarked cop cars that they change the badges on, and do a little body work. The spinners, well they are priceless.

by ilium55 on Dec 13, 2010 9:40 PM PST up reply actions  

They're real pieces of crap

Every cop agency in America prefers the Crown Vic.

U feeling Loco?

by M. AGRIPPA on Dec 13, 2010 10:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Cool uniforms, tho!

Looks like the wings of an eagle on the shoulders of a Duck?

"Every rock that someone threw at me, I just used as a steppingstone." (Allen Bradford USC Tailback aka: "B-Rad"- Conquest Chronicles)

by BixBeiderbecke on Dec 13, 2010 8:28 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines

Managers

Images_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan