In spite of this weekends win the offense continues to sputter
Fans and pundits alike continue question and wonder about USC's offensive production this season.
Many want to point to the tired and worn excuse that without Norm Chow the USC offense has never been the same. Some will say that it is because of Pete Carroll's ego, wanting to have complete control to run things his way in respect to the offense and then there is the other faction that simply simply say that Pete Carroll is simply an average offensive coach.
Who knows...
I do not think that it is too far of a stretch that it is probably a little bit of all three. No coach can do it all, no coach is always right and big time football coaches do want to run things their own way.
Go Figure.
Regardless of all the psycho-analysis or pining for the past, the fact still remains that the USC offense this season is far from living up to where many of us thought it would or should be.
After the seventh-ranked Trojans beat Washington State 27-6 Saturday night, Carroll effusively praised his defense, which took a shutout into the final minute and racked up eight sacks. Carroll even said the defense had "an easy game," handling everything Washington State could throw at it.
The USC offense is where nearly every fault with these Trojans (3-1, 1-1 Pac-10) currently exists, and Carroll isn’t afraid to say it—albeit a little indirectly.
"It’s great to win, it’s fun to win, but we’ve got a lot of work to do," Carroll said. "Gosh, it’s just not at all the satisfying kind of win we would have liked to have had. … Defense played really well. There’s a lot of room for improvement. Most of the problems were self-inflicted."
[...]
The offense wasn’t nearly as impressive, even with the return of freshman quarterback Matt Barkley from a bruised right shoulder. Barkley’s arm still hurts, but he pushed through the pain to pass for 247 yards and two long first-quarter touchdowns.
OK, so what is the problem?
To me it is simple...it is coaching or lack there of.
The biggest problem I see is ball control. 1) Either protecting it once you get it or 2) making sure you get it when it comes your way. The second one really pisses me off. Ellison should have caught that ball in the end zone it was right in his hands. Ausberry seems to have hands of stone...he had one pass placed perfectly by Barkley on the sidelines that he could not hang on to. Ausberry is a pretty big guy so he should be able to muscle opposing defenders away from the ball. Patterson made a nice catch also but he went out of bounds before he caught the ball...that is coaching as well. The receivers need to have a sense of field presence.
Just what are the coaches doing to ensure that our guys are learning the proper technique to protect the ball? You can't teach concentration either the player has it or he doesn't. Ausberry and Ellison, for all the great things we have heard about them, should do a better job at hanging on to the ball. Yes, Ellison did get a TD against SJSU but we are at a critical time now. SC needs to score when they are that deep in the opposing teams territory. That does a lot to build a teams confidence...it takes away all the second guessing. When the team executes on the easy plays it allows them to expand the play book, to start opening things up.
USC for all of their talent, are really being scrutinized for their lack of production on offense. I don't know if it is on Morton, Bates or Carroll.
They are responsible if you ask me...
USC is headed for a season like we haven't seen in a long time if the team doesn't start producing like we expect them to.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Would Pete have been considered...
such an “egotistical”, “bad-offense” coach if Mark Sanchez had stayed at USC this year? Somehow I think not.
oc phil
by oc phil on Sep 28, 2009 6:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yah exactly people are to spoiled I have seen so much since 1965
To have the success USC has had in the last 8 years is fantastic, some people never can see the light.
Paul D. Kelley
It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!
by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 28, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have seen nothing but BAD BAD BAD from this year's trojans
Right after the Ohio State game I knew something was wrong. I convinced myself that Ohio State was “just that good” and we were on their home field, coupled with a “bad night.” But after the Washington game (which i was at) and the Wazu game, it is obvious that these trojans are just missing something. Are we as Trojan fans “spoiled?” Eh, you bet we are. So what about it? Last year’s performance, and especially 3 year’s ago or further, performance, has nothing to do with this year. Regardless of the success of the past 8 years, we have the talent to be successful this year as well.
What is missing? In my opinion it is the offensive play calling. During the Washington game i was incredibly angry at the play calling. I mean, we could have rushed the ball on UW EVERY play. It seemed as though we were gaining 10 yards a carry. Instead of changing the game plan and going with what was working, ie rushing the ball, the play calling had us go with the pre-determined script. Sometimes you gotta go with what’s working. During the UW game, that was RUSHING the ball. We became incredibly obvious, and the UW defense which is lacking mightly on talent, stopped us cold in our track for most of the game.
We need that playcalling which:
1) goes with WHAT WORKS
2) is surprising and not stale.
3) puts to use our big advantage (offensive line, running backs)
Also, why do we continue to use the same backs when other backs seem like they have more potential? Allen Bradford and Marc Tyler in my opinion should be used much much more than they are. They are big powerful backs who wear out a defense.
Our receiving core is really underperforming. Unfortunately, dropping balls seems to be a mental issue, and mental issues seem to have a way of infecting others like a virus.
The defense, although looks great on paper, is also not as dominant as last year. Instead of the best defense i’ve ever seen, we have a bend but don’t break D this year. I don’t know if it will be enough.
This year seems to be turning out to be a rebuilding year. Luckily, it is still early in the season and we have a chance to turn things around. Next week will be a huge test. We will see.
by plyka on Sep 28, 2009 9:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Out of curiosity – at Washington, as I understand it, the running game went smoothly until Washington countered by stacking the box. Without a passing game to force the Washington defense out of that positioning, what should have been done?
by DC Trojan on Sep 29, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SC rebuilding or in trouble
After the first quarter, this was a hard game to watch. If not for being confined in the coliseum, channel surfing would have been an inviting option. The Trojans exposed a team that is either struggling in transition, with a young quarterback and several new coaches, or worse, a team in a big mess. Matt Barkley was certainly a highlight, but PC’s lament said it all—SC will struggle against, tougher more quality opponents. Thank goodness, after other Pac Ten results, ‘quality opponents’ may be more like ‘equality opponents’. The Rose Bowl is up for grabs with no team stepping up to make a dominate statement.
Coaching: There is a severe lack of chemistry with this team that previous teams did not experience, even with coaching changes. Excessive penalties, fumbles, dropped passes, shanked field goal attempts etc., scream of confusion and no-confidence. And confidence begins with coaching. Opening the play book against WSU certainly helped, but many issues still abound. Coaches…..its your team to make or break.
Confidence: And speaking of confidence…Aaron Corp, unfortunately, looks done. I was one of his biggest cheerleaders, but he looked, almost scared to go in. And this was clean-up time. My god, he looked nervous practicing center snaps, And the results…….sad! Mustain or even G. Green would now be a better back up. I do stick to my previous arguments that PC’s handling of the QB-situation the past two weeks contributed to Corp’s demise, and he responded by crumbling. Now, It will be near impossible for him to contribute.
Fight On
by Trojans 09 on Sep 28, 2009 10:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A substantial number of those problems you identified could have been said of prior year – I’m thinking Booty – teams. Does that mean that an all-everything QB is the make-or-break for this team to work with there coaches.
by DC Trojan on Sep 29, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Offensive Stats Show a Clear Trend
The numbers don’t lie. Our national offensive team rankings in the two most critical categories during the recent glory years:
- 2002 – Offensive Scoring, #9 @ 36 pts/gm; Total Offense, #8 @ 449 yds/gm
- 2003 – Offensive Scoring, #5 @ 41 pts/gm; Total Offense, #14 @ 448 yds/gm
- 2004 – Offensive Scoring, #6 @ 38 pts/gm; Total Offense, #12 @ 449 yds/gm
- 2005 – Offensive Scoring, #2 @ 49 pts/gm; Total Offense, #1 @ 580 yds/gm
- 2006 – Offensive Scoring, #18@ 30 pts/gm; Total Offense, #21 @ 392 yds/gm
- 2007 – Offensive Scoring, #34@ 33 pts/gm; Total Offense, #29 @ 435 yds/gm
- 2008 – Offensive Scoring, #22@ 38 pts/gm; Total Offense, #11 @ 455 yds/gm
- 2009 – Offensive Scoring, #55@ 29 pts/gm; Total Offense, #29 @ 424 yds/gm
1) Clear drop off after 2005 with no top 10 rankings.
2) This shows the growing PC influence on the offense post-Chow. Kiff/Sark, along with the same stars on offense, really kept the Chow offense going in 2005.
3) Could the downtrend be explained simply by the QB? No, Mark Sanchez is an NFL star, yet we didn’t finish top 10 in offense EVEN with Sanchez.
Over the last 3 seasons, USC is on avg the #25 scoring offense and on avg the #20 total offense in the nation. We are trending even worse this season. Yet, no one can argue that USC has not had top 3 to top 5 talent on offense during these years. Our talent base is proven by recruiting rankings, player awards, and NFL draft positions.
FACT: USC has underperformed offensively for years as a result of PC’s increased control over the offense and refusal to give an experienced, top notch OC the reins.
FACT: In 1/3 of the new season, Auburn, under new offensive coordinator Gus Malzahn, has improved from the #104 total offense and #111 scoring offense in the nation to the #3 total and scoring offense in the nation.
PC needs to wake up and smell the coffee, or USC may never win another BCS Championship. We are underachieving relative to our talent with an underperforming offensive system. It’s not the players, the penalties, or even the assistant coaches, it’s the system that is bad.
by DFWTrojan on Sep 29, 2009 12:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Fact
Chasing after the “flavor of the month” hot coach/system is the WORST thing that the team could do. Stability is a very good thing, the great teams have it. True the USC system works better when you have two Heisman trophy winners on the team (and one of the Heisman winners isn’t even the starter at his position) but then that would go for most systems. USC has been in the thick of the MNC race to the end every year. NO other team can say that.
And I’d be more impressed with Auburn’s numbers if they hold up after they stop playing cupcakes.
oc phil
by oc phil on Sep 30, 2009 1:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














