Conquest Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Week One: Previews and Predictions for all 15 games

Is Barkley at 80% better than Corp at 100%?

Pete Carroll is facing renewed criticism over his choice to name Matt Barkley the starting QB for Saturday's game against Washington St.

The "problem" seems to be that Barkley is still recovering from his bruised shoulder from the Ohio St. game...his throwing mechanics and production, from articles I have read, do not seem to be where they should be in some peoples eyes.

Who really knows? The coaches usually have more information than the rest of us...

Star-divide

The usually even keeled Michael Lev of the OCR is the latest to offer up his criticisms...

After Matt Barkley scrapped through practice Wednesday, his shoulder clearly not fully healthy, this is what I thought USC coach Pete Carroll might say:

"We’re going to go with Aaron Corp this week. Matt just isn’t ready. He needs another week off. Hopefully, he’ll be ready to go next week for the Cal game."

This is what Carroll actually said:

"We are going to go with Matt in the game. He’s ready to go. It’s clear that he had a very good day today, feels good about it, and off and running we go. I am happy to get him back out there."

Did my eyes deceive me? Did Carroll see something I didn’t — something completely different?

Before Wednesday, I refused to go along with the conspiracy theorists who asserted that Carroll’s affinity for Barkley was affecting the coach’s judgment. Now I’m all in.

Clearly, Carroll wants Barkley to be his starting quarterback. Period. Given Barkley’s immense talent and upside, I’d have no problem with that — if Barkley weren’t still injured.

I am little surprised by Lev's tone here...not that it matters what I think. I have said in the past I am not going to second guess the coaching staff. The press may attend all the practices but they are not in the coaches meetings and a lot goes on in those meetings.

Lev's colleague at the OCR, Scott Reid, reported differently...

Freshman quarterback Matt Barkley also continued to make progress Thursday.

"He had his best day by far," Carroll said. "He's all pumped up about playing Saturday."

Barkley, who also missed Saturday because of a deep shoulder bruise, looked noticeably sharper in both his throwing motion and velocity.

"He's 100 percent," freshman wide out De'Von Flournoy said. "He's throwing bombs out there."

Reid did not raise the same issues as Lev did. If anything he though Barkley "looked sharper" in practice. If Reid thought there were some issues I am sure he would have reported it and I would then be a little more intrigued over this but nowhere in Reid's reporting did he raise the same issues as Lev. It would appear that they were seeing the same things at the same practice but they interpreted things differently.

What should surprise no one is that it is pretty clear that Pete Carroll doesn't have faith in Aaron Corp. I keep going back to Corp supposedly not being comfortable with the playbook more than his deer in the headlights performance up in Seattle. If Corp is not grasping the playbook after 3 years then he may never be ready.

I like Michael Lev...I have always thought that his writing was no nonsense unlike others in the LA press, but I will ask the same question of Lev that he asked us in his article....Did his eyes deceive him? Did he see something different than the rest of us last Saturday? Corp isn't ready mentally...Barkley can manage the team without having to get to crazy on the field. I would agree with Lev that if Barkley is not able to chuck it down field to take advantage of a supposed open playbook that we won't see much in the way of an explosive offense. And I do think that is an important step to make...but you can put Corp in there and open up the playbook but if Corp cannot grasp it then what is the point?

I don't know why people just can't see it for what it is without going all dramatic. Pete Carroll likes Matt Barkley as the QB, Aaron Corp was less than stellar in his performance, execution and understanding of the offensive scheme...after three years in the system. Mitch Mustain is not an option.

Right or wrong. Good or bad. For better or worse. Pete Carroll has made his choice.

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Maybe Lev had problems with Barkley when he was at MD

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 25, 2009 7:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Rebuilding Year

People seem to overlook the OSU game because we won. But, the offense was almost equally as anemic in that game under Barkley’s lead. OSU is not good, and UW is a .500 squad. I think heavy criticism of PC in the UW loss is warranted. We did look inept. It was Stanford 2.0. I can understand getting some bad bounces and losing to a vastly inferior team once every 10 years or so, but not once every 2 years.

There are deeper problems with the offense….coaching, philosophy, system, etc. Yes, Barkley is PC’s guy, and he is the 2nd coming of John Elway. We are investing in Barkley this year to build for future championship runs. We should be back in the championship chase in 2011.

But, how is Barkley’s shoulder going to hold up when he gets hit? With Cal coming up, this is a major concern. I say play Barkely for 1 half against WSU JC. Then, put in the Moooooos-tain with a healthy lead.

by DFWTrojan on Sep 25, 2009 8:54 AM PDT reply actions  

It became a rebuilding year when Mark Sanchez decided to go to the NFL and the coaching staff was raided by UW. One can easily imagine where we’d be if Barkley hadn’t shown up for spring ball. For those that can’t imagine; we’d be 1-2 with fans split down the middle arguing who is worse, Corp or Mustain; and everyone clamoring for PC to bring Barkley up as soon as possible.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 25, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

dude, SC does not rebuild, just reload

by impaulv on Sep 25, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

We’re loaded allright… with problems. We’re going to learn what we’re made of up at Kal.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 25, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I understimate the disruption factor that asst coaches turnover can have. Wow, it is hard to imagine where we would be if Barkley hadn’t come this spring. Maybe Mustain Would have started SJSU and set the world on fire? But, probably not.

Matt Barkley, 2011 Heisman & BCS champion

by DFWTrojan on Sep 25, 2009 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm, methinks Corp would have won against SJSU then lost at tOSU plus UW . The mob would be clamoring for Mustain this weekend and likely would get him.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 25, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree that Corp would have lost tOSU

But, what if Mustain started SJSU due to Corp’s injury? Mustain Nation almost happened. I used to think that kids shouldn’t skip spring high school, but in retrospect, Barkley made a brilliant decision. Jumpstarted his career big-time.

by DFWTrojan on Sep 25, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought about that, but the way PC’s been acting I think for SJSU he would have started Corp and played him for bit more than a half. Mustain would have gotten extended garbage time.
I’m not sure if Barkley decided himself or if PC pulled him into the fray knowing that the other guys were not up to standard.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 25, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Forget about it, everything is going to be all right

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 25, 2009 10:31 AM PDT reply actions  

Well, it is this week

I mean, you could have McKnight or Stafon run the single wing and still beat WSU going away.

by drothgery on Sep 25, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

New Offensive Scheme

“If they’re going to score points it’s all good, but we don’t need them to score points,” Trojans linebacker Chris Galippo said. “We can take the ball away and score points and interceptions and take it to the 1-yard line and all they have to do is quarterback sneak it into the end zone. We can win games that way.” (LA Daily News)

Should we just punt on 1st down? I do admire Galippo’s attitude! Fight on, Chris!

by DFWTrojan on Sep 25, 2009 12:31 PM PDT reply actions  

OK I'll bite

“Punting is winning!” RN

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 25, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Trojans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Sponsors

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Auburn quarterback Cameron Newton (2) scrambles around Arkansas State defensive end Jeremy Gibson (96) during an NCAA college football game on Saturday, Sept. 4, 2010, in Auburn, Ala. Auburn won 52-26 over Arkansas State (AP Photo/ Butch Dill)

No. 21 Auburn Vs. Mississippi State Opens SEC Play Thursday Night At 7:30 PM

LANDOVER MD - SEPTEMBER 06:  Safety #23 Jeron Johnson of and cornerback #21 Jamar Taylor of the Boise State Broncos celebrate defeating the Virginia Tech Hokies 33-30 at FedExField on September 6 2010 in Landover Maryland.  (Photo by Geoff Burke/Getty Images)

College Football BlogPoll Top 25 Week 2: Boise State Inches Closer

Georgia wide receiver A.J. Green talks to the media during the Southeastern Conference football media days on Thursday, July 22, 2010, in Hoover, Ala. (AP Photo/ Butch Dill) +4 updates

Georgia WR A.J. Green Suspended For Four Games

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Heat-deniro-kilmer_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan

Jk_small Joey Kaufman

Editors

Tblapic_small Julio Nievas