Conquest Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Washington Stuns USC 16-13 on a last second field goal

Photo

More photos » Elaine Thompson - AP

USC's offense looked anemic with first time starter Aaron Corp at the helm. The USC defense does a pretty good job.

I can't say I am really surprised with today's performance. And I am not going to get upset over it. SC did not do what they were supposed to do to win this game.

Simple as that...

Star-divide

Here is the Box Score.

This was not about USC going through a letdown after an emotional win. This wasn't about Sarkisian teaching his mentor a lesson. This was about a team that just seems that they are not as good as we have expected them to be.

Lets talk about Aaron Corp first.

Lets be honest...Aaron Corp is not the guy to lead this team. I do not care that it is his first start Barkley went through the same thing last week, he came through. It is clear that Corp has the talent but he has had three years in the system and he did not instill confidence in the offense the way Barkley did last week. Barkley is not perfect either but he at least got us the win and that is ll that matters...

I am not interested in hearing that PC did not do Corp any favors by making his decision as to who would start at the last minute. If Corp wants to be the starter he should be ready to go at all times. Heck, he got all of the first snaps during the week what more could he want. he looked tentative and forced a good number of his throws into coverage and he finally paid for it when UW picked him off to stop another drive deep in UW territory. I am puzzled as to why Bates and Morton didnt call more bootlegs or any play action plays. I can't possibly know what they are thinking but I am not smart enough to second guess them but I am curious as to why we didn't see more of that.

SC was running the ball pretty good in the first quarter only to go away from it...I don't know why? They were getting chunks of yards and the O line was generating some nice push but there were also some times when the O line was getting pushed back on their heels.

I can't explain it...all that talent and all those expectations but guys were just not executing.

A minimum of 4 potential scoring drives...3 lost to turnovers one to poor clock management at the end of the first half. even on the plays where SC recovered their own fumble I found myself just shaking my head. I have no idea how these guys lost focus in not protecting the ball...

The defensive front played a great game I really could not be happier in their over all performance. The secondary on the other hand looked lost without Taylor Mays and Sarkisian and Holt took advantage of the soft zone coverage that let UW hang around in the first half.

In the second half showed that SC just could not get things going. UW just had the momentum and even though the defense kept them form scoring any TD's UW did get a FG mid-way in the 4th Qtr.

SC finally responded with a nice drive that also resulted in a field goal of their own. They had some nice runs on that drive but they could not punch it in inside the UW 10-yard line.

UW moves the ball down the field for the FG as time runs out and the rest is history...

i just can't get upset over it because I saw this coming. I was primed for it.

I mean its not like we haven't been through it before so we will regroup and get back at it

0 recs  |  Comment 38 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nice write-up

I just hope all the Corp and Mustain apologists and PC critics finally shut up.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 19, 2009 4:44 PM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

In Corp's defense

its his third year at SC, but its his first year under the new OC. Barkley and he have the same amount of time with the current offensive scheme.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Sep 19, 2009 4:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

NO...

he should have performed better BECAUSE he was in the system for three years…

Just like Sanchez, booty, leinart and palmer before him.

by Paragon SC on Sep 19, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What would you know, have you ever played FB

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 19, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except for the fact that Bates made a big deal about not doing much to change the system his first year, just work on getting the players ready and maybe add a couple of wrinkles.

So even though there’s a new coordinator, they were trying to keep continuity.

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well....

Hopefully we get Barkley and Mays back next week and get this train back on the rails.

FIGHT ON!

by Laughing Stock on Sep 19, 2009 4:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

WOW I am lost for words but you never know and maybe as of last year the kids will rebound.

Sad thing wasn’t that we lost, but I hate to watch a bad FB game last week two teams played well. This week only one team gave it their all, Turf isn’t a USC field but I swear they jived us. Arbo was saying that before season started he told a friend that this team wouldn’t go undefeated maybe 2-3 losses, to young.

Wow secondary is really thin

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 19, 2009 4:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeap...

+1 on the secondary…thank you mister Wright for hitting the books and thank you Mr. Baucham not riding in a car…

by Paragon SC on Sep 19, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeap...

+1 on the secondary…thank you mister Wright for hitting the books and thank you Mr. Baucham not riding in a car…

by Paragon SC on Sep 19, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL you know what it's just a freaking foolsball game

There will be another one next week and another and another so we shall see what this team is made of. Right now I would have to say this team still doesn’t have an outright leader.

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 19, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

(1) At least there's no potential qb controversy (2) PC's Upset Losses

I was one who second-guessed PC’s choice to start Barkley over Corp. But clearly Barkley is the QB for this team. Corp, who’s calling card was making good, safe decisions, did anything but make the safe pass. He constantly threw into double and triple coverage. The worst pass had to be the lame duck to a wide open McCoy that fell way short. I wish Corp well, but clearly he will never see playing time at SC again.

I know Paragon will crucify me for this, but we have to start wondering about PC’s methods when it comes to these huge let-downs. We’ve seen it 4 years in a row now. Every year, we’ll make an excuse…13-9 was a fluke, Stanford was an injury, Oregon State was a let down, Washington was missing Barkley and Mays. However, at the end of the day SC’s got the deepest talent in the Nation and we still somehow lose to inferior teams and end up settling for the Rose Bowl. Yes I sound spoiled…but again, with the talent we have and the league we play in, we should be contending for the National Championship year-in and year-out.

by spn168 on Sep 19, 2009 5:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We are contending for the title every year. No matter how many times Pete says hold onto the ball, he can’t be there securing it. The front seven looked great.

Ultimately, this game was decided by turnovers. We had 3 and forced 0. We left 12+ points on the field.

Next week we’ll beat wazzu, move on, and continue playing. The boys will bust their asses.

Anyone who says we didn’t come to play Is wrong. We ran hard, our defense never gave up, and quite frankly, we played terribly and lost. But don’t confuse lack of execution with lack of effort.

Fight On! Beat the Wolverines!

by USCLink on Sep 19, 2009 6:08 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, you’re back – even more elusive than me the last few months!

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I decided to lay low after the mcnair story broke…I felt a little bit responsible for that one. I graduated in may and am currently working as a financial advisor. Life is busy but I still make a point to check the site daily. You and paragon have done a fantastic job with the site.

Fight On! Beat the Wolverines!

by USCLink on Sep 19, 2009 7:00 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Getting a decent job after graduating in this job market is no small feat – well done you.

As for past events, whatever. Tempest in a teapot.

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I won't crucify you for it
we have to start wondering about PC’s methods when it comes to these huge let-downs. We’ve seen it 4 years in a row now.

maybe we should…i don’t know.

PC definitely gives us the best chance to be in the discussion year in and year out but tonite was very surprising. for all we have heard about corp he sure looked pretty pedestrian.

Corp deserves a lot of the blame but he isnt the only one. piss poor clock management, poor ball control. stupid penalties name it.

Thank god we got it out of our system so we can move on…i mean it is not like we have not seen this before…lets see how they respond.

by Paragon SC on Sep 19, 2009 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunately, and I really don’t mean this to be as rude as it’s going to sound, Washington State probably won’t do more than confirm how bad the rot really is. Struggle against the Cougars, and the team might as well hang out a sign for the rest of the conference saying, “Hey, this could be your year!”

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

3 things we know

1) This is Barkley’s team
2) We lost to a good team that will end the season ranked by only 3 points, without our best player (Mays), and with a bench warmer QB.
3) Never count Pete Carroll out

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 19, 2009 6:53 PM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Well

I was wrong about Corp. I admit it. He didn’t show any of the poise that I saw him have at practice. He forced a lot of dangerous throws, and it was surprising that he wasn’t picked off more times. I’m happy that he got his shot, but I’m not happy with what he did with it. He really can’t complain now.

As for the game…. the running backs lost it for us. Too many fumbles. It was atrocious. I have to hand it to the Huskies though. Polk was a mad man. He really pushed the pile after contact and fought for those extra yards. Jake Locker is the best QB in the Pac-10 by far, and he proved it today on 3rd and 17, and 3rd and 15. We went 0-9 on 3rd down, and thats all on the QB.

It wasn’t the best effort. People will try to turn this into another stanford, but its not. Washington is a good team, with a great QB. They will probably be in the hunt for the Rose Bowl.

Final thought. Stanford won with 4 picks. Huskies won with 2 fumbles and a pick. We are only beating ourselves here.

Oh yeah… and our special teams are killing us. How about having a punt return without a 10 yard penalty.

Rant Over

by frak on Sep 19, 2009 7:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Can’t hand the ball over that many times and expect to win. Rather like our near escape from Seattle a couple of years ago when SC spotted the Huskies nearly as many penalty yards as they were able to generate on offense.

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

McKnight's Fumbles

PC is all about keeping turnovers to a minimum. Why is it that Joe McKnight gets a pass? I know he’s the home-run threat and comes up big in some games, but he’s a fumble waiting to happen. No one else – not Johnson and definitely not Gable – get a pass. Any insights?

by spn168 on Sep 19, 2009 8:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I can only think that it’s because McKnight is so capable of cracking out big gain plays. Otherwise he’d be spending more time on the bench. I didn’t catch the game this afternoon but I saw the replays on Sports Center (repeatedly) and that one fumble from McKnight that SC recovered was at the end of a long run – the perfect example of the risk and benefit of keeping McKnight in the rotation.

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is it exactly

and I hate it. I’d rather have consistency than a guy who hits the big gainer 1 out of 10 times. McKnight’s risk reward factor is starting to go too far towards risk for me.

[DELETED ZOMG NO POLITICS]

by bluemax on Sep 19, 2009 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Silver lining

That douche of all douches, Wolf, is getting his just desserts over at his embarrassment of a blog. The fake quarterback controversy he promoted so vehemently went down in flames and the mob is savaging him mercilessly.
BTW, you Bruins aren’t looking so hot either (barely leading 13-9), hopefully you can hold on for our Pac-10’s sake.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 19, 2009 9:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I see you’ve thrown a couple of logs on the fire. (I assume rightly so, I don’t read Wolf’s blog but it sounds like he’s been talking nonsense all week, judging by people’s reactions.)

by DC Trojan on Sep 19, 2009 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No S#!T, Loco!

Now he’s trying to blame Pete.

Yeah, to a degree, the coaching staff needs to look at what they do in order to avoid this to happen year after year.

Still, I can blame Pete, to a degree, for being outcoached in the 2005 13-9 game, allowing JDB to fling the ball downfield with a broken hand in the 2007Stanford game, and poor defensive prep in the OSU game, but not this game.

Three TO’s in the red zone and a QB who cannot make plays downfield or convert on third down are not Pete’s fault.

And the game was lost because of the fumbles only if you accept that Aaron Corp, as a starting quarterback, is such a significant step down in talent that you expect a Jonathon-Crompton-like 22-13, 110 yds, 1 INT, 0-10 on third down suckitude to be the norm. Otherwise the blame is to be shared: the skill players fumbles matched with Aaron Corp’s lack of skill.

Hey, maybe that can be an award, the Crompton of the Week: For the quarterback’s who’s ineptitude leads a favored team to a stunning defeat.

I mominate week’s Crompton Award winner to be Aaron Corp.

by Zoulou on Sep 19, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

WORD!
Three TO’s in the red zone and a QB who cannot make plays downfield or convert on third down are not Pete’s fault.

I couldn’t find supporting data but this must be the first time in USC football history that we couldn’t convert a single 3rd down.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 19, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I quit reading his blog when I got sick of his Girls thing and the fact he a jerk.

No info on that blog and for some reason my computer doesn’t like that site, dude is way to much of a fem (maybe metro sexual) for me to follow. I really don’t feel he has USC heart at his best interest other than making a buck and picking up on co-eds.

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 20, 2009 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did anyone notice that Corp's best play was ...

The pitch to McKinght.

And I’m not being sarcastic.

Think back to the times Sark and Kipp got cute with Mark and JDB and called option style pitches, only to have the play lose yards. Then we’d all scream at the TV and Mark and JDB would be throwing downfield again.

There is an art to pitches and reading defenses at the line of scrimmage. If I am remembering correctly, Corp took two steps to the right, saw the end crash inside and the linebacker run toward the sidelines to cover McKnight on the swing route, pitched the ball in stride to McKnight who then rumbled 40 or so years before fumbling backwards 10 years.

McFumblezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

Then think about the times Corp dropped back to pass. He’d look downfield during his dropback, only to look immediately for the hot route dump off to the back. And remember he wasn’t sacked all game.

When he was required to look downfield, he’d laser in on first option and try to force the ball there. I think he tried to go over the top of the linebakcers only once or twice, with success only on a PI call.

That wounded duck to an open McCoy in the seam pretty much sealed Corp’s fate as the next Brandon Hance. It’s clear to me, at least, that Aaron Corp lacks the downfield vision and arm strength necessary to run the SC offense.

Corp prolly should transfer after this year, and I mean that with good intentions. It’s pretty clear to everyone who saw this game that Aaron Corp is not a pro-style QB. His game is spread and run option offenses, where you have really only have make reads at the line of scrimmage, and not run through progressions downfield.

But Corp as a successful, pro-style QB that is counted on a minimum of 25 TD passes, 2800 passing and 11 wins per season. Not happening.

by Zoulou on Sep 19, 2009 9:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

PC got out coached in this one

For the third straight week we tried to beat a team without having our QB make plays and this time it finally caught up to us. The lack of adjustments on O were pretty obvious and Corp was so rattled in the third that the only reason he wasn’t pulled is because Barkley’s injury was really that bad.

Also Sark attacked the middle of our defense which has always been a weakness of our of scheme. We’ve always been susceptible to teams with good TE and Sark probably knows this better than anyone.

As if the rest of the Pac 10 hadn’t figured out the play book on how to beat us, I think Sark just showed them a whole lot more.

Aside from that, Jake Locker is the real deal. That guy made something out of nothing more times than I can recount. He might be the most complete QB in the conference right now.

I hope Barkley is healthy next week and that Bates and Morton finally open up the playcalling a little. As good as our O Line is and our RBs we can’t beat teams by running the ball every down. I think these next two weeks will define our season.

[DELETED ZOMG NO POLITICS]

by bluemax on Sep 19, 2009 11:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I was thinking about just that comment on the template having been provided. With the exception of Washington State and possibly Arizona, the rest of the conference has to like their chances right about now. As indeed might the owners of college football’s decided schematic advantage.

Still, never say die, there’s plenty of football to be played, and whatever other optimistic cliches you can think of. Provided that the coaches can set on a plan and get the players to follow through…

by DC Trojan on Sep 20, 2009 12:08 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Please don't overrate Washington

Because the Huskies didn’t beat us. WE beat ourselves.

I was at the frakkin game today on the 40 yd line most of the game only around 20 yds away from Barkley watching him toss the ball on the sidelines, jump around, pull on his helmet, jawing with his teammates and coaches, and all but beggin PC to put him in the game. Barkley was ready to go.

We lost because our RBs couldn’t protect the ball, we lost because Corp sucked like no SC QB has sucked in recent memory, and we lost because PC is so damn unwilling to ever pull a QB from the game.

But do not overrate the Washington Huskies. Rose Bowl contenders my ass. We could have should have won this game by 21 points. We gave the frakkin game to Washington. Jake Locker – we contained him awesomely. Polk – the same just check his stats.

WE beat ourselves today folks. UW is a pedestrian, 5-7 team at best. Pretending that Washington is a good team is a lame excuse for our crappy execution and nearly insane game management. USC beat USC today.

by uscdude on Sep 20, 2009 12:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
We lost because our RBs couldn’t protect the ball, we lost because Corp sucked like no SC QB has sucked in recent memory, and we lost because PC is so damn unwilling to ever pull a QB from the game.

Exactly, although I believe Pete did the right thing in keep Corp in the game. Any starting QB should be allowed to extract himself from his own suckitude.

by Zoulou on Sep 20, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Corp's suckitude depth

Was almost unfathomable. I agree with you in principle Zoulou, but I don’t agree about today’s game from the facts I observed. I don’t know how it looked on TV but in person it was frightening just how incompetent Corp appeared to be. Incapable of performing at even a minimum level of USC quality. On the sidelines he was always either looking at the ground, or staring in space like he was daydreaming. Honest.

A sky crane hoisted by a 747 might not have been enough to extract Corp from the black hole of suckitude he created today.

New depth chart: Barkley, Mustain, Corp.

by uscdude on Sep 20, 2009 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He looked pretty bad on TV as well.

The color people (Griese and Norrie) pretty much wrote off Corp by the middle of the third quarter.

I think the Corp era came to an end after SC’s first possession after the 4th quarter. From their own 24 yard line, Corp threw the worst looking pass I’ve seen from an SC QB in decades to a wide open McCoy in the seam, and was short by about five yards. Then McKnight for three yards, then Corp forcing the ball to a double covered Ausberry with the Mike linebacker jumping up and batting down the ball. The next series, the FG goal series, Corp didn’t throw once.

The other thing I’ve noticed is that SC never once went “empty” (no one in the backfield) the entire game with Corp. That’s a stable of the SC offense. That also tells me that the coaches of little faith in Corp and that Corp is utterly useless unless he can dump off to a RB running the hot route.

by Zoulou on Sep 20, 2009 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My 82 year-old mother could have made a better throw to McCoy.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 20, 2009 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As I said in the game tread it would be good for Corp to transfer to a Lutheran college.

 Because they are generally D-2, D-3 or Naia that would fit his ability

Paul D. Kelley

It's not about doing your job, But can you do it with a TENNIS BALL in your throat!

by so.cal.native1952 on Sep 20, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

After viewing the game again (with a couple of stiff drinks)...

It is glaringly obvious that the “horrible play calling” was born of AC’s inability to throw the ball. The most painful scene was when Bates had to sit him down to review the gameplan and check-off the plays AC was not comfortable with.
He threw six times that I could count into double or triple coverage, so it was a minor miracle he was only intercepted once. His passes sailed like lame ducks, most of them underthrown, and he kept locking on to his intended receiver. He was so spooked that on the final drive there was no way Bates could ask him to throw a pass.
As far as the fumbles are concerned Joe was being Joe; but knowing the gameplan was out the window and doubting AC’s abilities, Johnson and Havili tried to wring every last inch out of their ill fated carries, instead of taking care of the ball.
Yeah Pete shoulders the blame, he blew it at the end of the second quarter and he should have pulled AC in the third, but if Mustain had laid an egg the uproar would have been that much worse. Finally, if Barkley can’t come back next week Garrett Green should be given the opportunity, as a Senior at least he’ll show some leadership.
Corp should move to wide receiver or transfer.
PS: We’ll be lucky to have 70,000 next Saturday.

by Locoweed 1.1 on Sep 20, 2009 12:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Trojans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
2010 USC Baseball Season Preview

Recent FanPosts

Pk1_001_small
Ucla FB and the Clippers
Untitled_small
David Sills' recruitment: The joke is on bRuins
Galloping_horses_small
From the Helicopter Pilot
Jackburton_small
Kiffin gets a head start on his 2015 class
Spqr_small
Top Questions For USC Coaches From UCLA Type Players
Jk_small
Non-Revenue Sports Coverage
4759_114276103488_551713488_1998274_134838_n_small
Great Read On Seantrel
Pk1_001_small
Looks like Trojan Mens Tennis team is starting off season with a bang!
Pumpkingatwedding_small
Recruiting Definitions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

4759_114276103488_551713488_1998274_134838_n_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan

Official Partner of CBS Sports