Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How Not To Criticize Tom Brady For The Patriots' Loss

Should the Pac-10 keep the round robin?


Hey all. I wanted to alert you guys to a Fan Post I just wrote for CGB focusing on what the Pac-10 as a whole gains, and loses, as a result of the round robin. As you guys are our brothers in arms, thought you might want to check it out. There was a lot of talk about the round robin earlier this summer, but with football season practically upon us, I figured it was a good time to actually look through some of the numbers.

Thanks!

LINK


This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks

Yours is a great read. I’m interested to see how this year’s predictions shake out.

by Nashville on Aug 25, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pac-10 going to become 12

With 2 divisions
North South
Wash USC
WSU Stanford
OSU Cal
Oregon Fresno
Boise St ASU
Utah Arizona

Paul D. Kelley

BN is a myopic site

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 25, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions  

Hmmm … I see someone has been replaced in this list :)

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by SoCal Oski on Aug 25, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I feel that is a more competitive schedule

Since Fresno seems to be more on the upside and this way they can be cleared to play in one of the HS leagues. And if the Washington schools don’t get it together they will be replaced with BYU and Hawaii

Paul D. Kelley

BN is a myopic site

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 25, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like your sense of humor

but if you’re going to replace anyone in the Pac-10, the Washington schools have been exploring depths of degradation and craptasticness barely even observed by UCLA. :-)

by ucladj89 on Aug 25, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions  

WSU

won the conference in 2002. Washington won in 2000, and won the Rose Bowl. Now both programs have been down for a while, but then again, so have the bruins.

by frak on Aug 26, 2009 6:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

my point was not that they haven't had some success over the past decade

but their current woes far exceed UCLA’s. What was Washington last year, 0-12? Even as bad as UCLA was (and we WERE bad) we still eked out 4 wins. We have been mediocre longer, but haven’t plumbed the depths like these two prorams.

by ucladj89 on Aug 26, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Reminds me

“Hey Pot, say ‘Hi’ to yer cousin Kettle. Y’all haven’t seen much of each other lately.”
“But Uncle Irony, that can’t be my cousin. He ain’t ‘black’ enough!”
“Who you calling ‘black’?”

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 26, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wsu had 3 QB's go down

ucla knows what that is like. The Cougs had to put out ads on campus asking for open tryouts at QB. Yes they are having problems over there, but I would say that if ucla is ahead of WSU over the last 5 seasons, it isn’t by much. The last time I went to a WSU-ucla game at the Rose Bowl, the Cougars beat the bruins.

by frak on Aug 26, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines

Managers

Images_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan