Should the Pac-10 keep the round robin?

by Nashville on Aug 25, 2009 8:13 AM PDT Comment 15 comments

Hey all. I wanted to alert you guys to a Fan Post I just wrote for CGB focusing on what the Pac-10 as a whole gains, and loses, as a result of the round robin. As you guys are our brothers in arms, thought you might want to check it out. There was a lot of talk about the round robin earlier this summer, but with football season practically upon us, I figured it was a good time to actually look through some of the numbers.

Thanks!

LINK

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors.

0 recs | Comment 15 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

We discussed this issue here as well

and you provide a great complement to this:

http://www.conquestchronicles.com/2009/6/24/923414/another-year-same-result-sec-big

by anh_sc79 on Aug 25, 2009 8:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Thanks

Yours is a great read. I’m interested to see how this year’s predictions shake out.

by Nashville on Aug 25, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Pac-10 going to become 12

With 2 divisions
North South
Wash USC
WSU Stanford
OSU Cal
Oregon Fresno
Boise St ASU
Utah Arizona

Paul D. Kelley

BN is a myopic site

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 25, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Hmmm … I see someone has been replaced in this list :)

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

by SoCal Oski on Aug 25, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

I feel that is a more competitive schedule

Since Fresno seems to be more on the upside and this way they can be cleared to play in one of the HS leagues. And if the Washington schools don’t get it together they will be replaced with BYU and Hawaii

Paul D. Kelley

BN is a myopic site

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 25, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

nice one socal

This had me laughing

by frak on Aug 26, 2009 6:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Frak soon to come my US and California stimulus packages

Paul D. Kelley

BN is a myopic site

by so.cal.native1952 on Aug 26, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

I like your sense of humor

but if you’re going to replace anyone in the Pac-10, the Washington schools have been exploring depths of degradation and craptasticness barely even observed by UCLA. :-)

by ucladj89 on Aug 25, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

WSU

won the conference in 2002. Washington won in 2000, and won the Rose Bowl. Now both programs have been down for a while, but then again, so have the bruins.

by frak on Aug 26, 2009 6:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

my point was not that they haven't had some success over the past decade

but their current woes far exceed UCLA’s. What was Washington last year, 0-12? Even as bad as UCLA was (and we WERE bad) we still eked out 4 wins. We have been mediocre longer, but haven’t plumbed the depths like these two prorams.

by ucladj89 on Aug 26, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Reminds me

“Hey Pot, say ‘Hi’ to yer cousin Kettle. Y’all haven’t seen much of each other lately.”
“But Uncle Irony, that can’t be my cousin. He ain’t ‘black’ enough!”
“Who you calling ‘black’?”

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Aug 26, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Wsu had 3 QB's go down

ucla knows what that is like. The Cougs had to put out ads on campus asking for open tryouts at QB. Yes they are having problems over there, but I would say that if ucla is ahead of WSU over the last 5 seasons, it isn’t by much. The last time I went to a WSU-ucla game at the Rose Bowl, the Cougars beat the bruins.

by frak on Aug 26, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs