Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

Pac-10 coaches...get rid of the round-robin schedule

Just saw this on Ted Miller's Blog

In an informal poll conducted by the Pac-10 blog, conference coaches voted 6-4 in favor of ending round-robin conference scheduling and reverting back to an eight-game slate, which was how things were before a 12th game was added in 2006.

That's about how a straw poll went in May during the Pac-10 meetings in Phoenix, and feelings were strong enough against the nine-game conference schedule that the athletic directors will review the issue during their June meetings in San Francisco.

The vote mostly split like the current conference standings, with the top-half teams favoring nine games and the bottom half teams wanting to go back to eight.

There's a good reason for that. Nine conference games insures five conference teams will lose an extra game every season, which could be the difference between earning bowl eligibility or not.

That is a mistake and it is disappointing.

With a good portion of the conference struggling of late, adding a bunch of patsies to the schedule in the hope of easy wins really doesn't make us look any better than some of the other conferences.

You get better by competeing and testing your team against tougher competiton. As it stands now there is no hiding in the Pac-10 you have to face everyone.

I see this a step back...

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I saw this as well...

and it is very disappointing. It would be very interesting to see which coaches voted against the extra game.

--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog

by jtlight on May 28, 2009 12:57 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree with you paragon

I never really thought too much about the missing game against one conference opponent since UCLA always plays the schools I want to see them play each year: USC, Cal and Stanford. However, now that we are playing every team in the conference I like it-no lucky break by missing somebody having a great season or seeing another team racing for a major bowl beating up on some bottom-tier team you didn’t get to play through a quirk in the schedule. Hope the coaches think a little more carefully about this one.

by ucladj89 on May 28, 2009 12:59 PM PDT reply actions  

The funny thing is that you still play state rival.

But the good thing is that you get to play another conferences power team and beat them up to show BCS.

Paul D. Kelley

by so.cal.native1952 on May 28, 2009 1:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Disagree with all of you

I wrote a while ago about disadvantage of 9 game conference schedule. Until all other conferences play 9 confence games, no need to shoot yourself in a leg. The playing field must be level. The conference needs the bowl and TV revenue.

by anh_sc79 on May 29, 2009 6:15 AM PDT reply actions  

no easy answer

I understand but SC won’t be hurt by this the conference will, I think it will encourage sloppy scheduling and that could hurt overall SOS

by Paragon SC on May 29, 2009 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agree

The businessman in me agrees. We need to play the game. No glory in losing out on bowl games based on higher principles than the rest. My heart still disagrees.

by DFWTrojan on May 29, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we should go back to the way it was....

so we dont have to play any more games in corvalis.

by frak on May 30, 2009 10:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines

Managers

Images_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan