USC - UCLA = most overrated rivalry?
Came across this "gem" from Ivan Maisel:
The USC-UCLA rivalry is the most overrated in college football. There is a rivalry. There is some emotion. There is some dislike.
But, c'mon. It's in L.A.
His main argument boils down to "It's LA". Funny, especially coming from Stanford alum. If USC-UCLA is overrated, what can you say about Stanford and Cal, which have been pretty much irrelevant in CFB scene for the last 30 year (and longer for Cal)?
He fails to realize that while the football rivalry isn't as heated as Auburn - Alabama, the rivalry extends beyond the football field to other sports (sure, some clowns think USC-UCLA basketball rivalry isn't there, then you can make a similar case for non-existent USC-UCLA baseball rivalry), academics, business and job market. No other rivalry shares the same city and no other rivalry crosses as many paths as USC-UCLA.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors.
0 recs |
32 comments
Comments
I consider ND to be USC's main rival
Crosstown rival is all ucla is.
by frak on
Aug 18, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree with Frak!
This a regional rivalry that most of the country hardly pays attention to until there is nothing else to watch. I don’t know if it’s the most overrated but it is certainly the most bitter and unhealthy.
Whether anyone agrees or not, we need the clowns from across to to be competitive just like they need us to be competitive.
by Paragon SC on
Aug 18, 2008 1:12 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
ND is probably our primary rival in football
if only because they’re the only team we play regularly that matches us in tradition, history and legacy.
But damn if ucla isn’t our rivals in everything else (and I mean EVERYTHING). I grew up in Washington and the level of dislike between UW and WSU alum has nothing, nothing on USC ucla.
If it wasn't for college football I'd probably have given up on sports.
by bluemax on
Aug 18, 2008 5:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Every rivalry is regional
I couldn’t care less who wins between Auburn and Alabama, and I only watch Michigan-OSU if both teams are good (like 2 years ago). I haven’t watched Texas-Oklahoma in several years, I rarely watch Florida-Florida St., and I haven’t watched FSU-Miami in several years either.
The problem with UCLA-USC is that it hasn’t been competitive in 20 years, so nobody outside California has had much reason to watch. Same thing with USC-ND.
by SuperBruinMan on
Aug 18, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not sure where you live...
but it would appear that you need to get out more and go to some of these games…
ND ALWAYS draws a big crowd, no matter where you live in the U.S. their fan base is huge also their NBC contract gives them a lot of clout. As for UM – tOSU – that game is big every year regardless of talent or post season implications. Texas – OU not as much but that is a pretty good game too.
by Paragon SC on
Aug 18, 2008 6:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I live in LA
Michigan-OSU is big every year, because it has postseason implications every year. When was the last time neither were up for a spot in the Rose Bowl or National Championship Game? The others are great games too I’m sure, they just aren’t always relevant. Notre Dame draws crowds because they’re the Yankees of college football. People still love them or hate them even though they haven’t done much in the last decade.
The point is, if UCLA and USC are ever good at the same time, people will pay attention because it will be a good game, not because of emotion between the two teams. And it’s stupid to say it’s overrated, because it’s rarely mentioned higher than 10th or so, where it belongs.
by SuperBruinMan on
Aug 19, 2008 1:28 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They might pay attention
if the scenario you put forth ever happens but I just don’t see it as ever getting to the level UM-tOSU on a regular basis.
I never said its overrated, like I said I don’t know, it just isn’t as important in some peoples eyes.
by Paragon SC on
Aug 19, 2008 5:54 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Frak et al
I usually don’t like to say mean things but this post takes the cake. Let me get something out of the way: I a Bruin and of Irish Catholic people from the mid-west. Love ND football.
First, ND is your main rival? The only thing they compete with you in is football. “The only thing USC cares about is football” gripe that we Bruins love to say isn’t true? Sure, the ND/USC rivalry is the best FOOTBALL rivalry. However, no two teams go at each other, in other sports, as well as football, like our two schools. Besides in football, In the last 25 years it’s 12-12-1. I suppose that isn’t competitive? What is it with ND?
Last year, you won NCs in women’s golf and soccer. Who did you have to beat in the finals? We won men’s golf, women’s water polo, and tennis. We had to beat you in the finals of water polo and golf. I’m pretty sure you figured in the tennis NC as well.
So the statement “Crosstown rival is all ucla is” is somewhat dishonest don’t you think?
Second, ND: “they’re the only team we play regularly that matches us in tradition, history and legacy” is inaccurate as well. They’re tradition, history, and legacy is slightly more rich than yours (that’s a compliment BTW so don’t jump down my throat). if you wish to engage in this debate, I will be much obliged to take it up.
I understand that you get cocky around football season but come on! Our rivalry is known around the country as being the best. We compete in EVERYTHING, not just football. Sure you have been historically better at FB but we have been better at BB. Should we not get excited when your team rolls into Pauley because you aren’t as good? We still get up for it.
by Bruins102NCAA on
Aug 18, 2008 6:26 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe the context is in football
…so yes ND only matters as a rival to us in that sport.
Nobody cares about this rivalry east of the Mississippi. Sure it matters to us but not to a lot of CFB fans. Games come on too late, up and down fan base. UM, tOSU, Alabama, Florida, Tennesee, OU, Texas all sell out their games year in and year out. That doesn’t happen out west unless the teams are hot.
As for tradition, a word I hate and I have said so numerous times here, ND comes a hell of a lot closer to what we have accomplished in football than ucla has. You know, numerous Heismans, multiple MNC’s… is that the tradition you mean because to me its the only one that matters and ucla doesn’t come close.
The whole cross town rival thing is unique when compared to other rivalries across the country, especially when you include all the other sports you mentioned but until ucla starts racking up the same type accomplishments as SC has in football you’re just a crosstown rival to us. Sure you’ll get some wins and milk 13-9 to death but what did that get you? Another year of Dorrell who left a bare cupboard for Neu.
I can see exactly how you feel… you know, like the same thing your buddy Nestor says about us in basketball…
by Paragon SC on
Aug 18, 2008 7:18 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But I'm your buddy too Paragon
I just don’t like your football team. As far as the university and other sports, I’m ambivalent. Your FB team is great or else I wouldn’t care.
But you’re right, I misread, it is in the football context. My bad.
I will say this on that topic, why would you, an SC fan, deny having not only the best rivalry in college football but another at least in the top 10? Both involve your school. I don’t get the logic other than you either hate UCLA that bad or are really honest. I honestly think our football rivalry is known to the entire country. Michigan/Ohio St. is the only one I can think of as nasty as ours and even that isn’t as far geographically as one would think. I think they are about 100 miles apart. That’s not much more than a cross town rivalry.
And the poster thinks that the nature of the rivalry, that is, rivalry in every sport, spills over to the gridiron. I think this is a fairly valid point.
by Bruins102NCAA on
Aug 18, 2008 11:58 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because I have been fortunate...
…to see other rivalries and they take it far more seriously that SC or ucla do. Its also geographic, there is a hell of lot more to do in L.A. than there is in Norman, OK or Gainesville, FL so people can pick and choose things to do. Why do you think the NFL never really succeeded in L.A?
Time for a history lesson…
Most people who come to this site on a regular basis know I am not an alumnus of USC. My dad went to SC and played baseball there so I grew up going to the games, meeting Rod Dedeaux, Tom Seaver and Mike Garrett so I am a fan pure and simple. Having not attended the school I couldn’t possibly know or understand the rivalry because I didn’t live it.
Further complicating matters is that my brother went to ucla so there was always a little friendly banter going on in our house but not at the level that I see elsewhere. So, while I am not close to my brother I sure as hell wouldn’t treat him like a second class citizen for simply going to ucla (like some do towards SC…wink wink). So I see it through a different set of lenses than those who are alums of both programs.
You can call it an east coast bias if you want but I have been on the east coast for over 20 years and west coast football is treated with a shrug and a glancing wave. So, from a CFB fans perspective, who has seen numerous games outside of USC/ucla the rabid nature of other rivalries makes ours pale in comparison.
Its just my opinion…feel free to disagree.
by Paragon SC on
Aug 19, 2008 5:48 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I sort of do disagree...
Then again, I sort of don’t. As an ‘SC alum I’m right now living in Cincinnati and see the tOSU passion as well as the UK/Louisville basketball rivalry. I’ve lived in the Ann Arbor area and seen the UM side of that rivalry as well, and I have to say that the only thing that makes these rivalries any more impassioned is the fans’ passion for the specific sport involved. So in the sense that we’re talking only football, than you’re right, but it’s primarily because these people live and breathe college football and not because they care that their school is seen as totally superior in every other area. USC/UCLA extends so much further, however, into not only other sports, but into the business and law fields, into politics that it’s more like a Harvard/Yale rivalry than any other in the country that I’m aware of, although I haven’t been to Alabama and imagine that might be similar, certainly more similar than Interstate rivalries like UM/OSU or Texas/OU.
You guys are wrong if you don’t think it’s a national rivalry, also. I get chided by Bruins out here for wearing SC regalia, and I do the same to them. I correspond with the Colorado Rockies Minor League Coordinator for Purple Row, and he happens to be a UCLA alum, and we’ve exchanged some banter during the college baseball season about our teams. My mom went for just one semester to UCLA (transferred in from Scripps) and I don’t talk to her the week we play in FB, and didn’t talk to her for the week after 13-9. There are few people on the planet, mostly confined to actual terrorists and dictators that I have more disdain for than Nestor, but that’s probably because we didn’t hit it off very well when he was introduced to SBN. I think the rivalry’s much more intense than you’re giving it credit for.
by Rox Girl on
Aug 19, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fair points
but remember I never said the rivalry was overrated. I just don’t think its the #1 rivalry.
And yes i occasionally bump into a ucla alum here in NYC but that is pretty isolated. I see a ton of ND fans here and the banter is almost always cordial, That doesn’t happen very often when i bump into a ucla fan here. Which is why I also stand by what i said about this rivalry being bitter to the point that its unhealthy. And as you point out Nestor and his band of crazies constantly perpetuate it…I guess its just a certain sense of a lack of relevance that ucla is going through in football. His actions, at least to me, have nothing to do with rivalry but more to do with civility.
Whatever…
by Paragon SC on
Aug 19, 2008 8:21 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
true enough.
I’ll give you a couple of these points, particularly the last one.
by Rox Girl on
Aug 20, 2008 6:16 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bruins102NCAA might be your buddy Paragon, but I’m not your guy, friend!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 19, 2008 10:19 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not your friend, BUDDY!
Hey TwistNHook. Good to see we all read the same blogs.
by Bruins102NCAA on
Aug 19, 2008 10:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, I’ll admit it, I’m ALL your friends! And your buddies! And your guys!
As for what blogs, I like to read all of the Pac10 ones. Except for that CGB one. Those fuckers are crazy!
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 20, 2008 8:07 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Somewhat dishonest?
If you want me to clarify myself I will. I was referring to football when I made the statement about ND being USC’s main rival. I think a majority of the USC fanbase would agree with me on that one. The simple truth is that ND is the only team that we play on a regular basis that really can compete with, and surpass USC in terms of history, and tradition. ucla has not, and probably never will achieve what the Irish, or the Trojans have in football. This is my opinion. I don’t think its a dishonest one. ucla’s tradition and history in basketball will never be touched by the Trojans. I’m not going to disagree with any ucla fan that disregards USC as a main rival to their basketball program.
The USC-ucla rivalry in football is nothing compared to Texas-OU, Michigan-OSU, or Alabama-Auburn. The OU-Texas game has to be held at a neutral site because things like this happen:
Sooner Nearly Castrates Longhorn
Brian Christopher Thomas, 32, entered Henry Hudson’s Pub on 17 June 2007 wearing a Texas Longhorn’s t-shirt. When he did, Allen Michael Beckett, 53, an ardent Oklahoma Sooner fan began "trash talking."
According to Thomas when he decided to leave, he went to the bar to pay his tab. Beckett grabbed him by the testicles and wouldn’t let go. Once other patrons separated them “He could see both of his testicles hanging on the outside of his body.”
Beckett’s attorney denies his client attacked Thomas. He claims Thomas approached the bar and threatened Beckett. As Thomas is bigger, stronger, and younger, he claims that "… My guy was defending himself and just took control of the situation."
Nationally, the crosstown rivalry in Los Angeles will never be a marquee game annually.
by frak on
Aug 19, 2008 8:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
About the other sports
Yeah its nice when the golf/vollyball/baseball team wins a NC or has a good season, but to be honest, the only sports I really care about are football and basketball. There might be a wicked fencing rivalry between USC and ucla that I’m not aware of, but that being a fact wouldn’t take our attention of football in the slightest.
by frak on
Aug 19, 2008 8:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just saw the explanation
The lifeblood of a college rivalry is the identity that alumni and fans invest in their school. It is oxygen. It is all there is. UCLA may have lost eight of the last nine to USC by an average of 21 points, but the typical Bruin doesn’t feel a sliver of the angst that has taken up residence in the gut of every Alabama fan. The Crimson Tide faithful awaken every day knowing that they have to go into the office and face Auburn fans who will let them know — every day — that the Tigers have won six straight Iron Bowls. The laidback attitude of most Californians makes for a lukewarm rivalry between USC and UCLA.
Dumb. I think the reaction to 13-9 shows how much we care.
by SuperBruinMan on
Aug 19, 2008 1:37 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldn't question that you guys care
I just don’t think anyone else nationally does. That’s pretty obvious.
by frak on
Aug 19, 2008 8:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your comments on Cal sadden me.
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Aug 19, 2008 10:19 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This is all much ado about nothing
In football, I’d say both ucla AND Notre Dame are our main rivals. And this is quite unique- not just for the PAC 10, but for most any team in any conference. In the PAC 10, it’s NOBODY but UCLA that is our rival. Even if a good Oregon or Cal team happens to be in the BCS top 15- we Trojans LOOK for that UCLA game like none other for our conference. Obviously, Notre Dame is OUR rival, and THAT WON’T CHANGE any time soon. Football IS college sports. Both financially and fanatically. Nothing anyone says can or will change that.
I agree with 102- we compete with UCLA for “NCAA championships” year in and year out, and not just within our conference- as it applies to champions and championships. However, I’ve also witnessed firsthand the “generational” rivalry contained within the schools of the Big 10 and SEC. And NOTHING can top their historical disdain, ubiquitious suspicions, and impassioned partisanship as it applies to their inherent rivalries. Here in Los Angeles, it’s mostly a hatred for one another. Many UCLA friends of mine would much rather see USC lose and lose badly. Many USC friends of mine would much rather see UCLA fall off the face of the earth because they feel so hated by them. In other words, USC people could care less- UCLA people care SO MUCH they want to see and witness USC GO DOWN- and go down BADLY.
I grew up in NorCal, and my sisters attended/graduated from Cal and Stanford. Now, in the PAC 10- THAT’S A RIVALRY! The best in the PAC 10 from my perspective. Granted, I haven’t experienced the Oregon/OSU dynamic firsthand. Nor have I experienced the Wash/WSU rivalry neither. I’m sure they’ll have something to say about that.
"Surround yourself with people who can't live without football" - 1st tenet of 3 for Bear Bryant's 3 Rules of Coaching . . . . .
by BixBeiderbecke on
Aug 20, 2008 7:44 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Have to agree on Cal-Stanford
Thats probably the premier Pac-10 rivalry on a national level. I have had a chance to witness some of the Big 10, SEC, and Big 12 rivalries, and they are by far more crazy about those games than we are.
by frak on
Aug 20, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Key "phrasing" frak
And that should concur with Maisel’s article and Paragon’s take as well. The USC/UCLA rivalry IS overrated for the most part because on “a national level” it doesn’t quite register as a blip on the screen of the grand scheme of rivalries.
Frak’s done it again. Hit the nail on the head. On a national level, we don’t quite measure with the Alabama/Auburn, Harvard/Yale, Georgia/Florida, tOSU/Michigan level of rivalries. However, put the USC/Notre Dame in there, and you might have something!
"Surround yourself with people who can't live without football" - 1st tenet of 3 for Bear Bryant's 3 Rules of Coaching . . . . .
by BixBeiderbecke on
Aug 20, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Havard/Yale?
Maybe in the 20’s? Unless of course you’re talking about hockey :-)
by impaulv on
Aug 21, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then. . .
. . .hockey IT IS! (whew! I thought those teams were a bit of a stretch. for the life of me I couldn’t think of an East Coast/Ivy League rivalry that came to mind. What Ivy League rivalry is most fierce? You know, “national attention” and East Coast bias go perfectly hand-in-hand)
"Surround yourself with people who can't live without football" - 1st tenet of 3 for Bear Bryant's 3 Rules of Coaching . . . . .
by BixBeiderbecke on
Aug 21, 2008 3:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Until UCLA is good at football it isn’t that great of a rivalry.
www.sportzchat.com
by Linix129 on
Aug 20, 2008 5:10 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I actually agree with the Bruin
UCLA is our primary rival. The usc / ucla rivalry is alive every day, whenever an alum of one school interacts with an alum of another. I go to pretty much every home game and have since 1997 or so, UCLA is a different atmosphere — even from ND. Its not polite. People scream obscenitys and throw things. Fights break out. You do not see that at USC ND — at least at the Coli. The ND game is a fall classic, its something people watch even if they don’t care about either team. UCLA is the rivalry — it does not matter if anyone watches outside LA — ask which ever team lost last year — its the game that really matters.
by ilium55 on
Aug 25, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You make some interesting points iluim
but we are talking about football. ND used to be a lot bigger back up until you started going to games at the coliseum. I lost every ND game when I went to USC. I think they beat us 11 in a row. Every time the Trojans face the Irish I want to beat them into the ground. The fact that fights break out at the ucla-USC games doesn’t mean much. Yes the profanity and fighting is less when we play ND, because for the most part their fans and student body are a classy bunch. My last trip to South Bend there wasn’t a single fight, or foul word that was lobbed at my direction and I was sitting in the middle of the ND alum section.
To me the ND-USC game IS college football. It is a game that holds a national interest. People with no connection to the PAC 10, or college football will watch that game. ucla is a crosstown rival, and a hell of a basketball school. The truth of the matter is that Trojan fans expect to beat ucla every year, and hope to beat ND. Thats why the ucla game is not much of a rivalry to me.
by frak on
Aug 25, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs






