A list we DON'T want to be on next year
Bumped- Not really surprised but this cannot continue in the future- Paragon
The NCAA Academic Progress Report was just released and USC men's basketball was called out for missing the mark. The team scored an 863, while the minimum score to avoid penalties was 925. The data collected represents the 4-year period from 2003 to 2007. Yes, the calculation is negatively impacted by any underclassmen who bolt for the NBA without finishing out the school year, but that can't be the only excuse. This is clearly an area of concern for Coach Floyd and Mike Garrett moving forward, since we lost 2 scholarships because of it. The bottom line is that the men's basketball team is now limited to awarding only 11 scholarships next year.
No other USC teams missed the mark, and most were way above it (kudos to women's golf and cross country for rocking perfect scores of 1000). The football team came in with a 948, which has us tied with Washington at 3rd in the Pac 10, following Stanford and UC Berkeley.
Here's a link to the story in USA Today (NCAA links included in that):
UPDATE:
From All Things Trojan:
USC was informed of the punishment in the fall and given the option of taking the hit this past year or next year. They decided to take the hit sooner rather than later.
The lost scholarships were a result of Gabe Pruitt, Lodrick Stewart, and Nick Young not attending classes after the 2006-07 season.
USC officials are optimistic that things will improve next year because O.J. Mayo and Davon Jefferson did finish out their classes this semester.
Ahhhhh.......the gift that keeps on giving
0 recs |
8
comments
| Add your comment
Comments
something can't be right...
... I see that ucla’s football team posted a 941 – I thought that they were the elite of the Pac-10 and would easily smoke a bunch of thugs like SC? Never mind Stanford and Cal.
This is terribly confusing.
by DC Trojan on
May 6, 2008 2:13 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Neuweasel to the rescue
I’m sure a (short) bus full of tutors with passion buckets a-flowin’ has already been dispatched to the practice field at Westwood High.
by Defender90 on
May 6, 2008 2:21 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
It's not really a short bus...
...they just don’t want any more handicapped parking spot issues. Smart.
by DC Trojan on
May 6, 2008 3:11 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Typical NCAA clarity
According to the report on this story at ESPN.com…
”... Eighteen BCS teams were penalized, eight in men’s and women’s basketball and two in football. Of those, only four teams - Kansas State, Purdue, Southern California and Tennessee - made the NCAA men’s basketball tournament. All four could lose up to two scholarships next season but only if a player leaves school while academically ineligible…“
So maybe we didn’t/won’t lose 2 next year.
by Defender90 on
May 6, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Men's basketball
Is the one sport that scores the lowest academically of all the major team sports. This poll doesn’t surprise me one bit.
by frak on
May 6, 2008 4:51 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Classic Ruin stupidity
I saw few threads on this issue on several ruin sites – most of them are too stupid to realize that
a) this is a non-factor for the next season because USC accepted the immediate penalty last year and had 11 scholarships. So next year we are back to 13 (if OJ & Davon pass their finals)
b) scholarships were lost due to Bibby’s recruits (Lod, NY and Pruitt) & Bibby years (our lowest APR was in 2003-2004 and wont factor in next year) – so CTF’s recruits are actually keeping their word so far
c) their football APR was lower than ours
by anh_sc79 on
May 7, 2008 6:30 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
spin spin spin
We’re talking about the same variety of thinking that describes a 15 point dual meet win for the bruins men’s team as a throttling, and skips over the end of a 15 year streak for the bruin women by a 12 point loss.
We all do it to some extent, but a lot of those folks are on the asymptote.
by DC Trojan on
May 7, 2008 8:00 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Speaking of T&F
With all modern day scholarship limitations, USC has no business of competing against state subsidized T&F field from across the town. Yet, those clowns managed to lose last year in Mens T&F and this year in W T&F.
And yes, I said state subsidized. I perfectly understand that both teams get same number of scholarships and that FUCLA’s athletic department presumably doesn’t receive a penny from the state, but 1/2 scholarship at USC still leaves $15,000 of tuition, whereas 1/3 scholarship at UCLA leaves $6,000 to cover out of pocket…
So yeah… the clowns across town have no business of losing to USC in baseball, T&F, WP and many other non-revenue sports – but leave it to bRuins to screw up… Hell, I won’t complaint when that happens.
by anh_sc79 on
May 7, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs









