A Roll of the Dice
O.J. Mayo denied allegations that he accepted any improper benefits as has been widely reported since Sunday. Mayo was interviewed By the LA Times’ Ben Bolch this afternoon.
In his most extensive comments since the allegations surfaced Sunday during an ESPN "Outside the Lines" report, Mayo said he "didn't accept anything" and would cooperate with an NCAA investigation into accusations that he accepted tens of thousands of dollars in cash and benefits from Los Angeles events promoter Rodney Guillory.
"My family hasn't accepted anything, so I'm just waiting for the NCAA to do what they have to do to prove that I haven't done anything wrong," Mayo said. "I have nothing to hide, so I'm willing to do whatever to hurry the process."
The kid has guts I will give him that, more than Reggie Bush, in his willingness to cooperate. But is this a smart move? To me there is nothing good here. The first question I ask is about the cell phone and it is the easiest thing to prove. Clothes (regardless of who may have seen what at the clothes store), the flat screen TV and meals would hard to prove but the cell phone is easy.
I guess when you think about it, it really doesn’t matter USC’s allowing Guillory to have free reign of the basketball offices to me is enough with his past transgressions involving USC.
This should be fun to watch…
UPDATE 5/15:
There is a little more from the later release of the article and one thing that I forgot to mention yesterday.
What I forgot; one of the claims made by Johnson was that the money Mayo allegedly received was funneled through Mayo’s family or friends. Mayo states in the article:
I never have received money from Rodney, Louis, BDA or anything. All I got was a monthly $450 check from USC or I have friends and family that send me money."
Meh…I read that yesterday and really didn’t give it another thought. Yes, it was one of Johnson’s claims and that statement backs up his claim that as to Mayo getting money from friends but you have to prove that the money that Mayo received from family and friends actually came from Guillory/BDA (I think it did). A kid in Mayo’s position is bound to have a million hangers on and in order to stay in his good graces or hope to be in the inner circle later so they could give him money but that just doesn’t fit right. That seems to be a bit of a reach.
Mayo also, for the time being, is distancing himself from Guillory until this is all worked out.
Mayo said that he and Guillory, who could not be reached for comment, had not spoken since the allegations surfaced and that he would rather keep their relationship "kind of distant until I get to the bottom of things."
"I pray and hope that Rodney hasn't accepted anything from any agents," said Mayo, adding that he was unaware of a fake charity from which Johnson said Guillory withdrew funds. "He definitely didn't persuade me toward BDA."
Well, I definitely don’t buy that for all the reasons discussed over the past few days. I will give O.J., this he acting cool as a cucumber on this. He doesn’t seem phased about it all and he seems to have an answer for any of the allegations.
Like I said yesterday, we’ll see….
0 recs |
3
comments
Read Related
Comments
Here's a thought
He’s cool as a cucumber and has an answer for everything because. . . . . .because. . .?. . . .HE’S INNOCENT!
If people sincerely believe this guy is guilty as all get out, there’s always the possibility that these people can sincerely be wrong. Think about it.
by BixBeiderbecke on May 15, 2008 7:50 AM PDT 0 recs
Maybe, but...
not likely.
one of Johnson’s claims was that money was wired to WV to OJ’s friends and then it was passed on to OJ.
nothing would make me happier than to see OJ proved innocent but just Like Bush there is just too much circumstantial evidence that makes the situation look bad.
by Paragon SC on May 15, 2008 8:36 AM PDT 0 recs
I read Johnson
Has pretty savvy investigative skills, seeing as he’s an ex-reporter. No doubt he’s checked his facts, so let’s say in an open court room there is valid documentation as to the names, locations, etc of the wired money to his friends who supposedly then gave OJ the money. How is it then proven that OJ received the money (proof of exchange) and/or knew of the alleged scheme? Any lawyers out there? How can these dots connect- other than considerations of “strong circumstancial” evidence? Furthermore, what’s the burden of proof threshold? Can a mounted defense on OJ’s behalf legally squash or limit the severity of perceptions of such to a jury?
Listen, we’ve already discussed the damage done to USC’s reputation as well as OJ’s- and we already know that the NCAA is going to not look to themselves for fault/blame. This will solely ride on the shoulders of of ‘SC and OJ, their respective “benefit of the doubt” has already been damaged in the public’s eyes. I’m strictly talking “legalities” here.
by BixBeiderbecke on May 15, 2008 10:47 AM PDT 0 recs


