The Agenda
Note: As of this writing, I have not seen the piece on Outside the Lines yet. I am waiting for the 12pm EDT showing on ESPN News to see the whole thing. I am only going on what is on ESPN.com
Before anyone goes and lights their hair on fire over the allegations that O.J. Mayo received improper benefits from those who are/were in his inner circle I want you read the last paragraph of the story on ESPN.com . (emphasis added)
Johnson told ESPN he didn't get paid, but hoped to profit once Mayo made it to the NBA. He said he fell out of favor with Mayo because Guillory created a strain in the relationship by misrepresenting things Johnson allegedly said about Mayo and, eventually, sabotaging their relationship.
WOW! Really, so now that he is out of the picture, for whatever reason, he is going make these allegations without any form of proof?
Where have we seen this before?
Based on past allegations we all know Guillory is probably an unsavory character but unless Johnson can provide any other evidence that there were improprieties going on all we have is another case of sour grapes. I love how he acts like he is only looking out for O.J.'s interests...right, sure and you have no vested interest in this, am I reading you correctly here?
More importantly:
USC issued a statement, saying: "The NCAA and the Pac-10 reviewed O.J. Mayo's amateur status before and during his enrollment at USC, and did not identify any amateurism violations. Mayo and USC fully cooperated in these investigations. The University investigated and reported a violation involving Mayo's receipt of tickets to a Denver Nuggets game from his friend Carmelo Anthony. Mayo's eligibility was reinstated after he made a charitable contribution in the amount of the value of the tickets."
Once again, if the powers that be have done some due diligence and found no wrong doing then whats the point here?
I am sure we will hear more about this and when there is more we will comment more but until then it's best to let it play out. Let the clowns from across town light their hair on fire and throw wild speculation around. Heck, it's what their good at so why not get your entertainment free with your price of admission.
One final thing, if there was any concrete proof that OJ had taken money other than hearsay ESPN would not have waited for some OTL piece to break the story, they would have broken it on Sports Center just so they wouldn't get scooped by another media outlet.
I am going to need more than just the word of a jilted hanger-on to get me to believe anything here.
UPDATE:
OK, so I have now seen the piece. Right out of the gate Johnson acts like he has O.J.’s best interests in mind by coming forward. If he was so worried than why did it take so long for him come forward.
Clearly, Guillory is bad news. Whatever the reason he took advantage of BDA Sports and spent a lot of their money. There are a lot of copies of receipts and wire transfers yet no direct proof that Mayo took any money or gifts. Do I think BDA hired Guillory to to get close to Mayo? I could buy into that the wire transfers alone could be used to get close to O.J.’s friends in order build the relationship with Mayo but not necessarily pay Mayo directly. That's called walking around money. Shady yes but an improper benefit? Doubtful.
Anyway, those are my quick thought’s as I get ready to head out the door for Mothers Day. I will have more as this develops.
0 recs |
7
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
god damnit!
I’m not one to jump to conclusions, but what the hell is our compliance office doing? If they find ANY proof, we deserve what we’ve got coming. Its a shame. A damn shame.
The worst thing is, this opens us up to really intense scrutiny, with our two high profile sports both being investigated in a 3 year period.
ARGH!!!
Fight On! Beat the Wolverines!
by USCLink on
May 11, 2008 11:16 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Coming off a weekend (usually more staid media), the ensuing avalanche of national media tomorrow is going to be ridiculous. And if the university and the PAC-10 supposedly vetted this, the national media will feel even more empowered to do the job that those two groups couldn’t do…....double ARGHH!!!!
by ImperialTrojan on
May 11, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
President Sample must be getting tired of all this...
I expect him to pressure Mike Garrett and all the coaches in the athletic dept. to be more aware of their athletes’ transgressions. As far as Mayo is concerned, I hope he is right and did nothing wrong, because he certainly sounds confident that he did nothing wrong. I trust O.J. but its unfortunate that he is linked to such a questionable character in Guillory.
USC Sports Talk, contributor http://uscsportstalk.blogspot.com
by mel kiper fan on
May 11, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Had enough
Frankly, I’ve had it. No matter how much progress we make academically, it seems the athletic dept is hell bent on keeping the university of spoiled children alive and well. Winning championships means nothing if they are won by athletes that care nothing about the rules and their team. I hope Sample reminds Garrett and his coaches that they are not a training facility for professional athletes.
by naui on
May 11, 2008 4:27 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? USC may be getting bad press, but nothing has been handed down from the NCAA on Bush or Mayo. I think Garrett and Floyd deserve the benefit of the doubt (not to say that I doubt them in the least) among USC fans at least for the success that each has brought SC. As long as Southern California is one of the elite athletic schools they will have to deal with bad press from time to time, its simply the facts of life.
by Laughing Stock on
May 11, 2008 6:21 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
the walls come tumbling down
I hope Sample reminds Garrett and his coaches that they are not a training facility for professional athletes.
I think that would be as much news to them as it was to me ; )
by DC Trojan on
May 11, 2008 11:43 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I believe in giving Mayo a fair investigation
He denied any wrong doing, which means that he either is telling the truth, or he is very confident that nothing can be traced back to him. At the very least, he might be guilty, but not proven so.
by frak on
May 12, 2008 11:38 PM PDT
reply
0 recs








