Reflections on the End of Regulation
I remember way back in August when all of the pre-season previews had been published and all the yearly magazines had already hit the shelves and there were just a couple short weeks until college football season would begin. I remember the so called quarterback competition, the mumblings over the dissappointment of our receiving corps, but most of all I remember all of the hype for the apocalyptic game of the century against Ohio State. I also remember how cool it was to finally see college football on TV again as it had seemed like a small eternity since football had been on TV. In fact, even before the first kickoff had been kicked, the USC Trojans had already won 4 consecutive National Championships on the Xbox in NCAA Football 2009.
For SC fans the season could not have begun any better than it did against UVA. It seemed like USC was invincible and 55-7 vaulted them into the #1 ranking. Two short weeks later the Trojans crushed, absolutely CRUSHED, Ohio State and suddenly Southern California had no peer and an unobstructed path to the BCS National Championship Game lead by a QB who was suddenly one of the leading Heisman candidates. Then another two weeks passed and SC's fortunes had pulled a complete 180 after a stunning loss to Oregon State, and suddenly the Trojans were on the outside looking in. Luckily the team kept its composure and beat up Oregon 44-10 the following week and rode the nation's most dominant defense to a nine game winning streak to close out the season with another Pac 10 championship despite a few tight games.
In the coming weeks we are going to here a lot about various bowl matchups, and we are going to hear nigh endless speculation on the inevitable Florida-Oklahoma title game. We may also hear a lot about how this or that team (including USC) got slighted and has just as much of a right to play in the championship. With all due respect to the MSM though, this kind of thing is endlessly stupid, and it would be even dumber for any fans, especially SC fans, to pay attention to it. After the BCS poll is released today and the various bowls are set in place it simply does not matter any more what anyone thinks about whether this team belongs here or that team should go there or whatever should be the case. After all the talk about how CFB has the most meaningful regular season it is undeniably ironic that so much is written that serves to devalue a teams season by either denigrating a teams bowl or bowl opponent, or by what wondering what could have been.
So let's take a step back and appreciate the success we have had under Pete Carroll, both this year and for his career. SC now has seven straight 11 win seasons, the longest sustained streak of success ever, and as fans we are able to look forward to great football nearly every week. In January the Trojans will play in their 33rd Rose Bowl against an excellent opponent in Penn State, and despite what anyone in the local media may say, USC should feel honored to get to play there and uphold the schools tradition of winning in the Granddaddy of them all. Ultimately the BCS is a completely arbitrary and abstract system of selecting a national champion, and if USC can put on a show against PSU and leave the players and fans feeling like champions then that is all that really matters.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Thanks Laughing Stock!
What a great post!
Beat Penn St. !
"I was INVERTED!" -Maverick in Top Gun
by BixBeiderbecke on Dec 7, 2008 1:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
USC has a great, great defense
And it’s unfortunate that USC, like my Texas Longhorns, have gotten the screwjob. It happens every year and we won’t be the last teams to suffer it. While I think USC’s offense isn’t very impressive (still decent), that defense will keep you competitive with anyone.
CFB fans say it nearly every year, and I’ll say it again: If there’s ever a season for a playoff, this is it.
by TheElusiveShadow on Dec 8, 2008 3:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The BCS
only got it right in 2005 when Texas and USC were the only undefeated teams out there. USC and the PAC-10 is used to getting screwed. If you are in the Pac-10 you must have 1 less loss than the SEC or Big-12 leader. Tie goes to the SEC or BIg 12. We’ve seen it before, and we will see it again.
Six SEC teams in the top 15 at the beginning of the year shows how overrated that conference is. LSU, Tennessee, Auburn, and Georgia all turned out to be disappointing. What killed USC was the 2nd week where the entire Pac-10 lost their non-conference games to mid majors. We weren’t going to be forgiven for losing after that.
by frak on Dec 8, 2008 9:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Same rules apply...
… to the Big East and Big Ten (the Buckeyes would never have made the title game in 2006 or 2007 if they hadn’t had the best record of any BCS conference champ). There’s no reason beyond media expectations to say why USC and Penn State are playing in the Rose Bowl, not the BCS title game (of course, Texas and to a lesser extent even Utah, Boise, and Texas Tech can say the same thing).
And the non-BCS schools have even more work to do; they need to be two wins better to get in the title game (and that will never happen).
by drothgery on Dec 8, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah you're right
There’s always going to be someone looking in unless many factors happen to line up just right. The only time in recent memory that no one has had a gripe with the BCS is the 2005 season when USC took on Texas. Both teams were the only undefeated teams in the major BCS conference. Every other year that I can remember there has been someone left hanging out to dry. Some of them were tough luck, and others were just flat out stupid.
by frak on Dec 8, 2008 7:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 











