About that Monopoly....

It wasn't a blowout.
It didn't have to be.
USC did exactly what they needed to do wrap up their 7th consecutive Pac-10 Title and their 4th consecutive Rose Bowl appearance.
The USC Defense once again pretty much bottled up and opposing say for a double pass that caught both Clay Matthews (I think it was Matthews, it happened so fast) and Taylor Mays just enough out of position for them to take each other out the play and that came off a C.J.Gable fumble that gave ucla the field position to make that score.
In fact it was so dominating that ucla RB Kahlil Bell was named ucla player of the game with just 38 yards rushing. That's saying something!
A couple of things...
Major Hat Tip to Rick Neuheisel for calling the time out to even the tally in regards to to USC wearing their home jerseys.
The ucla defense is pretty good but they spend way too much time on the field because of an impotent ucla offense. For the most part they played some solid defnse but there were a couple of cheap shots that they delivered that were uncalled for. I realize that Rey did it as well but he was flagged for it and Pete Carroll pulled him for a few plays and Ken Norton sent a strong message that that would not be tolerated. I got a kick out of some of the comments from some of the jackasses across town hoping the ucla defense would "take Mark Sanchez out" as well as some other nice things that were said. Getting dominated like they were does that to some people, even the highly educated who look down their noses at the masses. You stay classy clowns...Moving on.
The ucla secondary played our receivers pretty good so hats off to them. Though I am not sure about that #2 pass defense rating...I mean SC put up almost 300 yards in passing on them and that was without Damien Williams being out for the the whole 2nd half. You have to give Kevin Craft credit he didn't meltdown and only threw one pick at the end of the game...but he sure tried to get it to SC more than a couple of times.
It was definitely disappointing to see Gable cough the ball up like that and it was even more disappointing to see SC get burned on the trick play for the TD but they settled down grabbed their lunch pails and went to work.
Here are some numbers..

Not a pretty sight for ucla.
It was a fairly balance offensive attack but there were head scratcher plays called but at this point it doesn't really matter.
I listened to the post game on the 710 ESPN internet feed and Pete Carroll announced that Sarkisian would indeed be taking the UW job. the official announcement can be read here. Sarkisian will stay on through the Rose Bowl though. I am ambivalent as to his leaving he had his good days and bad days. He called a decent game today and that is all that matters. The other thing that was interesting was Pete Carroll's endorsement of John Morton as the next OC. he didn't come out and say the job was his but he it sure sounded like he was leaning that way.
So now we focus on Penn State and the Rose Bowl.
Here is to another great season. Congrats fellas...you deserve it!
This is our Post Game thread!!
FIGHT ON!
0 recs |
25 comments
|
Comments
In the world of monopolies
USC is Boardwalk and ucla is still Baltic Avenue.
I always consider the current undergraduates the most diehard of all college sports even more so than alumni (even though they have mucho dinero). If slick rick and ucla want any chance to take back the football scene in LA he’s got to win over the students first. even though they’ve probably got a good 25,000 undergrads there the student section at the game was more than half empty at kickoff from what I saw.
Defense played a solid game-as usual. Except for that flub trick play on ucla’s first drive –sly trickery being the only way they could score. Giving up only 157 yards this game is an impressive feat. I have to give credit where credit is due, I thought pass blocking protection from the bruins was very good, I thought pressure from our front four would be too much for them to handle. But alas they gave up no sacks, reached the quarterback only a few times while craft looked comfortable doin work.
The offense struggled a bit and I hoped that they could have scored more points but 28 is more than enough to hand the bruins another loss. From my perspective I thought that the offense just wasn’t as tight as it could have. Obviously I point to the first possession fumble, off target throws and drops were things that should have been addressed. But really the offense did everything they needed to do tonight to secure the win.
Finally I’d like to congratulate Kevin Craft for ending your first, and most likely final year as a ucla starter with 15 straight picks.
by sharpie20 on Dec 6, 2008 8:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I noticed all those empty seats as well, and I also saw a lot of red in the ucla sections. I didn’t attend this game, but friends who did said that they were booing Neuheisel when he was making a post game speech. Don’t know what’s up with that.
I was nervous the first half when we were only up by 7 for awhile. That game was going exactly according to plan for ucla. Big turnover deep on our territory, a trick play for a touchdown, missed field, etc. It was pretty obvious that their strategy was to play very conservative, keep things close on defense, and hope for some big breaks. Fortunately, our offense put it out of reach with that third touchdown late in the half.
There did seem to be more excitement this year with Neuheisel around and the home jerseys. I’m hoping for the bruins to significantly improve next year and come into the Coliseum as a ranked team wearing their powder blue. About time this game got some national interest beyond just the analysts guessing USC’s margin of victory.
by FanAcrossTown on Dec 6, 2008 9:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think they have been playing clue, but it seems like they have no clue!
Maybe they can get the new monopoly game.
Paul D. Kelley
by so.cal.native1952 on Dec 7, 2008 8:48 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
read this over at the loney pen
Open Letter to Cheatie Petey First, I think that many Bruins are justified in thinking your home jersey move did not have the rivalry in mind. I think you are like most trOJays when you think that our rivalry isn’t important. It has become clear to me now why you did it and it infuriates me: You did it to express some sort of "this is our house sentiment." Your players before the game gathered on the UCLA logo and did some sort of circle-jerk about how OUR house is yours. Sorry Petey, you play in South Central with your SCandal prone Seasoned Criminals. Your arrogance is unfathomable.
I got news for you Petey, this ain’t your f**king house. You and your team’s arrogance in suggesting that you "own" Los Angeles is pathetic as well given that your university doesn’t even have "Los Angeles" in its name. We represent Los Angeles because WE ARE THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES. We are academically and athletically superior to your university in every way except for football (this year). How dare you claim anything to the contrary.
Another thing Petey, you have become the whiniest piece of shit in all of college sports. First, you lose to OSU. Then you struggle with other weak Pac-10 schools. Then you think that you should be in the title game. You whine because you haven’t got a shot in hell of making the title game now that OU beat the number 20 team in the country by 41 points. Your arguments are EPIC FAIL Petey. The only way you can get a "NC" is by getting the AP to anoint you again. Not going to happen. So console yourself in winning the Pac-10, I hope it makes you feel like the consolation prize that it is. Don’t feel bad, the consolation prize for you beating us this year is knowing that we had a little part to play in exposing your mediocrity and that you will not get a NC.
Complaining about "late hits" was pretty funny. I enjoyed that "alleged" rapist getting smacked around. It’s a great hit, helmet to helmet or otherwise, when one of your players hits Cowan or Craft, but when we get a little payback, then you cry like a bitch. What’s the matter? You can dish it out but you can’t take it?
Lastly, UCLA will contend again: Everything that rises must surely fall. This is the mode of the universe. You will fall and until you do, I will be there wishing with every once of my being that it happens sooner rather than later. I pray to God that I will be there to see it when it happens and let EVERY trOJay know that I will have a smile on my face.
Yours Truly,
Biggest Penn St. fan.
by Bruins102NCAA on Dec 7, 2008 1:33 AM
This jerk post over here a lot, nice guy isn’t he!
Paul D. Kelley
by so.cal.native1952 on Dec 7, 2008 9:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I saw it this morning...
just like Texas in ’05
by Paragon SC on Dec 7, 2008 10:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The guy's a clown
I SHUT THAT GUY DOWN A NUMBER OF TIMES, notice how he doesn’t come over here to do his little whine. Oh, that’s right. The first time he came over here. . . .WHIIIIIIIIIIIIINE! (and I quote, "oh, I like you guys. you guys like me? that’s just so delicious!)
"I was INVERTED!" -Maverick in Top Gun
by BixBeiderbecke on Dec 7, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My favorite complaint is that USC can’t represent Los Angeles because the city’s name isn’t in the university’s name. Perhaps we could take that critique to heart and claim to own all of southern California for college football since the region is included in the University’s name.
“Overwrought” is the word that comes to mind. Happens to all of us at times of sporting duress.
by DC Trojan on Dec 7, 2008 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
USC football is Southern California football
Who else would represent football in Southern California and Los Angeles? Raiders? Rams? Chargers? who is the best charger of all time? Junior Seau- a Trojan.
ucla basketball isn’t even the best in the city, they’re not even second, they’re third behind the Lakers and the Clippers. and their basketball program has become the Notre Dame of college basketball, it’s glory days are long gone. USC is bar none the best football program in Los Angeles, anyone with half a brain knows that. maybe if those jealous ranting lunatics would stop wasting their school’s money on moronic attack ads they can raise their stature from laughing stock to doormat with in an couple years.
by sharpie20 on Dec 7, 2008 11:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was about six feet from being a blowout
Make those three field goals, and it’s 37-7.
by drothgery on Dec 7, 2008 9:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Funny
They call Pete Carroll a cheater, but if you look up Rick Neuheisel on Wikipedia this is what you will find just 3 sentences in:
He has been linked to multiple severe recruiting and ethics violations over the course of his coaching career. He was the head coach for the Colorado Buffaloes football team as well as the Washington Huskies football team. He coached the Huskies to a victory in the 2001 Rose Bowl. He was fired from Washington in 2003 for betting on the 2003 NCAA Men’s Division I Basketball Tournament in a bracket pool.
Funny how their coach has a huge black eye of a reputation for breaking the rules, yet they seem to be willing to give him a pass for it. Pete Carroll will never, ever be seen in a bad light the way that Neuheisel was and probably will continue to be. He will have to run a clean program for a decade or so for people to forget Colorado and Washington. The bottom line is that 5 years ago he was busted for the gambling, and he flat out lied to his boss. Thats right he flat out lied. You can change your behavior, but I don’t believe you can really change who you are as a person. I believe Neuheisel probably won’t pull the same shenanigans as he did at his other jobs while at ucla. But I believe that he will stay on the straight and narrow not because its the right thing to do, but because he is too afraid of getting caught again.
bruins shouldn’t point fingers at Pete and his program when they have the one college coach in the land with the worst reputation in the land coaching them.
by frak on Dec 7, 2008 12:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Three Words: They Envy Us
They’re just too miserable and sad to admit it. Yesterday marked the 7th straight 11+ win season and 7th straight pac-10 title under Pete Carroll, I will give 100 dollars to the next bruin who can name the last year ucla won 11 games in football.
UDub is still reeling from the tarnished reputation caused by slick rick’s tenure. 0-12 not long until ucla’s program crashes to the pits of hell.
by sharpie20 on Dec 7, 2008 11:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The results of this game
is precisely why the UCLA marketing department’s ad was AT LEAST one season premature.
Next year, who knows? But NO ONE in their right mind was saying UCLA was going to finish anywhere close to competitive with USC. Ugh …
Well at least Rick Neuheisel didn’t pop off about he was going to kick those guys asses across town. Oh wait … that was Tim Floyd.
by Seanny Rotten on Dec 7, 2008 4:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
I believe that RN tried to insinuate just that during halftime at Pauley when he introduced Chow and Walker
by Paragon SC on Dec 7, 2008 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Two different things -
insinuating (did you see the video btw?) and explicitly calling out. I watched the video of that intro at Pauley and all I saw was pretty standard college rah rah stuff.
This is a sharp contrast to being quoted in print the way Floyd was.
In any event that stupid ad was premature. If anything it set up the “…over there” response tshirts (very funny).
by Seanny Rotten on Dec 8, 2008 12:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Premature, I don't really think it will ever be drinkable I would say bad grapes!
Paul D. Kelley
by so.cal.native1952 on Dec 8, 2008 5:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As long as Carroll stays
I believe he will get more talent to come to USC than Neu will get to go to ucla. Yes the bruins will get better, they can’t possibly get any worse, unless you think they are capable of pulling off what the Huskys did this year. How hard is it to improve on a 4-8 season. Even Paul Hackett managed to win more games than 4. Here’s the real question. How many wins does Neuheisel have to get to make sure his fans keep eating those rotten grapes. 6 games? 7? What do the bruins expect next year?
by frak on Dec 8, 2008 11:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
far be it from me to speculate
But you’d think they’d be looking to get into a bowl at least. If they can stitch together a healthy O-line and teach Craft or an alternate to pass accurately enough to not have every play have to be be a running play, there’s no reason they couldn’t win 7 – 8 games running away… unless they’re having a lot of graduation on defense?
by DC Trojan on Dec 9, 2008 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It depends on injuries
Most are hoping for 8 or more, given the favorable schedule. But if injuries on the offensive line continue at the rate the rate there was all this season, just getting to a bowl game may end up being the target.
It looks like 2011 will be the year it all comes together, unless the impending disaster at DT isn’t avoided.
by SuperBruinMan on Dec 9, 2008 4:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
SBM
are you at all worried that Neuheisel has peaked in the past during his sophomore season, and digressed in his 3rd and 4th years. If you look at Colorado and Washington, Neuheisel’s teams seem to drop off when they end up playing with players that he recruited. Do you think this could happen at ucla?
by frak on Dec 9, 2008 7:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
I don’t know much about those teams. IIRC though UW lost several key players after his second year, so a drop off after his second year would have been expected. If there was pressure on him about other issues going into the final season, a below average result wouldn’t be surprising. I don’t know anything about the Colorado situation.
by SuperBruinMan on Dec 9, 2008 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess the recruits
from this upcoming class will determine how well you guys do in 2010-11. This is a really important year for you guys in recruiting.
by frak on Dec 10, 2008 2:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know Ucla has had a bunch of injuries in the last ten years, I mean even in the late 60s and early 90s.
Hope you guys work that out, it would be great too see both L.A. programs do well in pac-10.
Paul D. Kelley
by so.cal.native1952 on Dec 10, 2008 4:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












