Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Watch out for a fired up Huskie team...

...so how will USC respond?

When I heard that Ty Willingham had been fired from the University of Washington the first thing that came to my mind was that Willigham's players are going to put a little extra effort into Saturday's game. This is typical human nature as the players, for the most part, are loyal to Willingham and will probably take his firing pesonally.

Seems like I am not the only one...

"I think it definitely adds some spice to the game," USC offensive guard Jeff Byers said. "Their guys are going to be out and ready to play. They'll play good football. There's no question they have good athletes.

"We're expecting them to come out and play really well."

Carroll met with the media Tuesday at his weekly luncheon, and he said the Huskies could react to the news one of two ways.

Either the team could have any life sucked out of it, or as the Trojans expect, the Huskies could rally around the coach they've played for over the past four seasons.

"I think with the leadership they have and the strength of Tyrone, the way he's always handled his teams and all, they're going to be tough," Carroll said. "They're going to bring their best…

"I know I'm sure they have a really strong feeling about representing and doing a great job for him."

Willingham's hoping the same thing, that his resignation will be a rallying point for a team that's struggled epically in six-of-seven games.

Yeap, the Huskies will be fired up in order to stand tall for their coach. I have seldom seen a team in these circumstances outright flop. There is always some spirited play even if the team does lose they usually put up a hell of a fight. Even without QB Jake Locker in the game Willingham's player will answer the call and give it all they can.

This is all about pride now. It is Willingham's fault that this team has underacheived this season but with the final card played on Monday expect the players to take it personally and play like their lives are on the line. Of course if they put up a stellar performance, regardless of outcome, the question will be asked where was this type of performance before Willinghame was fired that could have saved his job?

UW has a tough hill to climb but so did Stanford so once again USC has to be mindful not to over look the Huskies as they send Ty off on his swan song.

The other thing to watch is how SC responds after another lack luster offensive performance against Arizona last weekend. USC is heading into its "home stretch" part of the season...the month of November.

Seven seasons. Twenty-three games. Not a single loss.

Maybe that's why Carroll sounded so upbeat after a tough and occasionally ugly 17-10 victory over Arizona on Saturday night.

"We're getting this thing moving," he said. "It will only get stronger for us, I feel, as we go down the road."

But his team, favored to win a national championship after pounding Ohio State in September, has looked less than invincible ever since. Saturday's performance prompted the question: Can the Trojans keep their slim title hopes alive with another perfect November?

"There's a lot of times we look like a championship team," receiver Damian Williams said, "and there's a lot of times we look like we haven't played football."

That's the truth...

I got an even bigger kick out of this.

In the locker room at Arizona, quarterback Mark Sanchez kept going back to a missed connection with receiver Patrick Turner early on, USC settling for a field goal. "I think if I hit the first pass of the game, it might change the complexion of it," he said.

It wasn't just one throw. Though they rank second among Pacific 10 Conference teams in yards and points per game, the Trojans have suffered flat spots.

"I don't know why," offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian said. "We have one good game and take a step back. Have another good game and take a step back."

Unbelievable...

Make something up, anything but don't say you don't know. I mean you're coaching him Steve, you mean to tell me you have no clue?

Is it the execution?

Is it the complexity of the plays?

Is it the personnel?

Please tell us you have some clue as to why Sanchez is lights out one week then then horrendous the next. We know Sanchez is emotional but what are you doing to keep those emotions in check. I never saw Palmer or Leinart hang on to a blown play the way Sanchez says he did on Saturday night. Maybe people are right Norm Chow really does know how to develop players both on the field and in their heads and while I wouldn't expect Sarkisian to be anywhere close to managing his players the way Chow would I would expect to see some progress instead of saying "I don't know".

Once again the stars are alinged for SC to fall with a motivated Huskie team and an offense that still seems like it's walking around blind without a cane with the up and down performances. It's easy to write UW off because of their record and the current state of their program But SC has been burned before so they once agin need to be mindful of the mine field ahead.

 

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sark learning on the Job!

I always thought that SS is learning on the job. He has some great players but does not know how to use them in the right situation. One example is that we are not able to get the ball to McKnight out in the open, where he would make the most difference. Joe won’t be a consistent inside runner until he bulks up in a year or two.

Bottom line, our offense lacks creativity. I do appreciate that SS does not come up with alot of excuses, but coach Carroll does seem to protect him in many occasions. Two years ago, it was that we had a new quarterback, last year, it was the inconsistent receivers. This year it is back to the quarterback and the line, and also the receiver. What excuse will be available next year when every spot will be occupied by a veteran?

One thing about the receivers is that even in the Lienart era (don’t wanna say Chow era), we had receivers dropping plenty of passes. This genuinely accounts for some incomplete pass statistics for the QB. Now Lienart never had 100% passing efficiency in any games, receivers dropped plenty of his passes. But we had enough creative plays that produced enough yardage and points, that receiver issues was almost never raised. SO why for the past 2+ years, we keep blaming our receivers. These were top notch athletes coming out of high schools. Maybe we were wrong about one or two of them, but we have so many. Mike Williams was not even considered as a WR coming out of high school but was a contributor from day 1 here.

I don’t think we’ll go anywhere with current offensive staff at SC. The stakes are high and so are the expectations here. Going to Rose Bowl year after year to play a second-tier Big-10 opponent, because we lose to an average Pac-10 teams is not going to cut it anymore.

by TrojanInAtlanta on Oct 29, 2008 11:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Lacks creativity?

I think if anything our offense tries to be too cute.

Direct snaps to McKnight, wacky motion plays to McKnight, etc etc. Sark has gone out of his way to make up crazy plays for McKnight that generally just haven’t worked.

Our offense has been best when its run consistently with Stafon Johnson, used quick timing passes with our tall WR (Williams, Turner) and then used play action to get Sanchez out in space to create deep throws.

Every time Sark gets too cute for his own good the offense sputters and we punt or turn it over.

You know what? Fuck you Sports Gods, fuck you.

by bluemax on Oct 29, 2008 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.

The thing is that these plays have not thrown the defenses off and have not produced big yardage. In fact they don’t even get us first downs. Calling a variety of plays does not mean that our offense is being creative. It is all about calling the plays that catches the defenses completely off guard. You’re right ‘bluemax’ that they try to be cute by calling all these different plays but the defenses seem to know what is coming. Even Sanchez rollouts are happening too often and defenses are responding each week.

by TrojanInAtlanta on Oct 29, 2008 3:54 PM PDT reply actions  

TrojaninAtlanta and Bluemax, now that you both have elucidated the predicament how is it solved?
Carroll seems to be in a comfort zone and oblivious to what is going on around him i.e. Bellotti’s program is getting stronger each year, Riley is starting to get results with his, Tedford, bless his heart will eventually get his act together and Stoops (if he doesn’t get fired) will have a better team next year………….So! what should Carroll do as impending parity comes to the PAC10? You both have pretty well pulled Sarkisians blanket, or perhaps it should be, with regard to Pete Carroll who is in control of EVERYTHING “The Emperor Has No Clothes” We have all heard the Chow conundrums, ‘he is great’ – ’it’s Pete’s Offense’ all mysteries and riddles. One thing that is apparent; look closely at Carrolls first 4 years at SC, then look at Carroll’s last four years at SC. If none of you can see the difference….then shame on you!
 
Fight On!

by alfa1 on Oct 29, 2008 7:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines

Managers

Images_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan