Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Once Again Old News

Yes, it's the off-season and there isn't much going on and while those of us look for interesting things to write there are some who continue to spew out the same drivel in order to continue to be relevant.

Such is the case with Terry Bowden and his "Bowden Files" gig on Yahoo Sports.

From his April 16th entry.

I saw where Reggie Bush's family agreed to a settlement and gave between $200,000 and $300,000 to Michael Michaels for unpaid rent and for benefits they received while Reggie was playing and winning a national championship for USC. Of course the family, including Reggie, always has maintained that it never violated any NCAA rules or regulations.

The NCAA says it has made two requests to meet with Reggie Bush through his attorney and followed up with a written request, but didn't get a response. Bush contradicted this assertion while visiting a Southern California practice last week, saying that he had not been contacted and that if he had he would have hung up the phone.

If Reggie Bush and his family continue to stonewall the NCAA like this, the organization has no other recourse but to go after USC as severely as possible and punish the institution for the actions of one of its players. This would include forfeiting games that he played in, even the national championship. If the NCAA does not act decisively here, it might as well forget about ever enforcing its rule against extra benefits.

I pulled his whole quote on the Bush situation if for no other reason to point out that he obviously doesn't have much else new to say except that without Bush's cooperation it would force the NCAA to go after USC hard and punish them for Bush's actions. I would say knock yourself out if they were going to hammer SC I'm sure we would have heard it by now. I'm sure the NCC is still investigating but it's premature to say the NCAA would severly go after SC if has cooperated and shown that they didn't know about Bush's actions.

It's nice to see that Terry has become more of a Hollywood reporter than a college football analyst. Reading some of these entries make me wonder if my 1 year old could a better job.

Pathetic.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Conquest Chronicles

Under Press

Jul 2008 by Paragon SC - 1 comment

Cry Me a River Part II

Feb 2008 by Paragon SC - 4 comments

The Ornstein Angle

Jan 2008 by Paragon SC - 15 comments

Who Really Cares?

Jan 2008 by Paragon SC - 18 comments

Comments

Display:

Terry is just mad...
that the Bowden family has become irrelevant in college football and that all his predictions/prescriptions regarding NCAA football never come to fruition.

I love hearing these homilies from SC haters around the globe about the type of repercussions and admonishment were about to receive from the NCAA. Spare me. At some point people need to realize that the "cheat on, cheaters! we may suck, but at least our school is clean!" hubris only wins you empty trophy cases and enemies. Does anyone really think hurling accusations and talking big game is going to do anything?

-Class of 2007

by Class of 2007 on May 7, 2007 6:10 PM PDT reply actions  

It is true though
If a player is ever in Bush's situation again, they now know that if they ignore it, it will go away.  And once people figure that out, what's the point in attempting any regulation at all?

by SuperBruinMan on May 7, 2007 6:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Also
At this point most of the speculation is about how hard the NCAA SHOULD go after Bush, while admitting that most likely very little WILL actually be done.  If anything.

by SuperBruinMan on May 7, 2007 6:59 PM PDT reply actions  

What can they do?
It's obvious that there is wrong-doing here, but what can the NCAA do to Bush?  He has no eligibility left.  They have no authority over the Heisman Trophy.  So what do they do?  He is beyond their ability to punish him.  All they can really do to him personally is hurt his reputation, or perhaps hurt him by punishing his teammates and his old school.

by frak on May 8, 2007 5:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Declaring him retroactively ineligible
It's actually somewhat common for this to happen.  Anytime a player is ruled retroactively ineligible, the team forfeits the games they played in.  It's very unlikely that USC will be punished directly, but if Bush is ruled ineligible they will have to forfeit games starting from when he first took extra benefits (which I think was around October 2004).

And the Downtown Athletic Club has said that if a player is ruled ineligible they will be stripped of their Heisman.  The BCS has also ruled that if a team has to forfeit games they will lose their BCS championship.

by SuperBruinMan on May 8, 2007 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Old news...so I'll say it again
Take the Heisman.

Take the MNC.

Take the records.

At the end of the day we all know what we saw, perhaps the greatest offensive machine in CFB. Eligible or not there is no mistaking the talent that we all witnessed.

The NCAA will have a tough enough time just taking scholarships, which will probably happen as there is nothing else they can do. But with the talent that SC has stockpiled I'm not sure how it will hurt, is my attitude smug? You bet, but if others are going to call us cheaters and keep lists of supposed infractions and endorse "cute" little websites portraying current and former SC players as criminals then I won't be very humble in the future...

by Paragon SC on May 8, 2007 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Declaring Bush Retroactively Ineligible
does not punish Bush.  That just hurts the school and all the people he played with.

Also, why are game forfeitures not wide spread when extra benefits situations come up.  I know USC didnt have to forfeit games when Shawn Walters took money.  I don't think the bruins had to forfeit the games where Deshawn Foster took the free car.  Is this because they still had eligibility to burn, or is the NCAA not in the habit of punishing programs for the actions of individuals?

The NCAA cant take away his Heisman.  They might be able to erase him from the official records.  But it seems like this is the best way to get at Bush.  I just dont think its fair to punish the whole team for what Bush did.

by frak on May 8, 2007 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's indirect
Declaring Bush ineligible IS a punishment to Bush.  Unfortunately for USC, they are the ones that suffer, and that would be Bush's fault.  The difference might have to do with timing.  Foster was caught in the middle of the season and suspended for a few games.  Don't know about Walters.

by SuperBruinMan on May 8, 2007 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Taking scholarships is unlikely
That would be a direct punishment of USC stemming from coaches' knowledge of Bush's misconduct (which the NCAA would be acknowledging).  If they say that Bush was guilty the whole ineligibility/forfeiture thing comes into play.

by SuperBruinMan on May 8, 2007 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thats why...
His comments are self serving. no one really knows what is going on behind the scenes so why speculate, which is what this is, speculation.

by Paragon SC on May 7, 2007 7:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines

Managers

Images_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan