Bandwagoneers, this is your cue - please jump
I can't believe some of the comments I am reading and hearing. I don't just mean here at CC, but in other places too. I couldn't care less what our rivals think of us. The talking heads can take their shots. And god knows that the vast majority of cfb fans didn't lose sleep learning we lost our game this weekend. In the same position, I'd be sick of us by now, too. However, I guess I have a fairly different perspective on what it means to be a fan. Booing your own team? STFU. You boo a bad call, you boo a late hit, you boo unsportsmanlike conduct, you boo an Ashlee Simpson halftime performance. You don't boo your own f*cking team... especially one that consistently brings pride and excitement to USC and its alums and fans. If you can't be bothered to support your team when its going through a rough patch, then, please, don't let the door hit you in the a*s on the way out.
As USC fans, we do have high expectations, but does any real fan of our program believe that ANYBODY hates the Stanford loss more than Pete Carroll? High expectations are fine, but that's not the same as expecting perfection. Until some distant future date when cyborgs rule the world, this game is played by college kids - many of them still teenagers. It doesn't matter how many 5-star recruits a team has or how much money the coach is paid, there is still the human element involved in all of this. Our team's performance Saturday is nowhere near the embarassment as is the petulant behavior of some of its followers; your choices do far more to damage USC's rep than any loss of any athletic team ever could. In an earlier response to the Stanford loss, another poster explained that he had seen USC lose its "fair share of games," then mentioned the 2 losses last year. Hell, I'll even throw in the Rose Bowl against Texas and the heartbreaking loss to Cal at Berkeley a few years ago and say HA! The vast majority of schools would kill for that "fair share of losses."
USC is, what, 69-13 (84% win record) under Pete Carroll? He's been named Pac-10 coach of the year 3 times since 2003. We've been ranked in the AP Top 10 for something like 60+ weeks. We have 25 wins over AP Top 25 teams. Our record with PC as head coach is truly staggering, especially considering the changes that have brought so much parity to the cfb game. Runs like we've had (and are having) happen very very very rarely. The fact is that USC remains the pre-eminent cfb program of the millenium and that's not gonna fall apart because of the Stanford game. To expect that our team isn't going to have off days or make mistakes or (gasp) lose a game now and then is just unrealistic and immature. I am all for asking questions and considering options as our season moves forward, but I also think Coach Carroll and the team have done far more than enough to warrant our support and encouragement, especially at a time when it would be most appreciated. If you can't wrap your head around that, maybe you'd be less frustrated confining your football enjoyment to NCAA Football 08 .
So yes, the loss Saturday stunk it up bigtime... to Stanford... playing their 2nd-string quarterback... in the Coliseum. Let the suicide watch begin. Please.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Conquest Chronicles' writers or editors.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Couldn't agree more
I understand your feelings but
The success you point to is part of the problem. If this was an average or just above mediocre team then what happened yesterday would mean nothing. But this is USC, and we got to where we are right now by having high standards. If you're okay with going 6-6 or dropping a humiliating game here and there then maybe that's the problem. There's only one way a team this good loses to a team this bad: incompetence bred from arrogance.
It isn't like we lost a game to Cal, Oregon, et. al. We've been losing to teams that have caught us looking past them. How can anyone stick up for that? Also, the fact that we've lost by such small margins and through turnovers points to the fact that we could have taken those games over. Instead, we became complacent.
I figured that after UCLA and Oregon State last year that we would have learned our lesson; all opponents deserve respect... Wrong. This shows how stubborn we've gotten on top of our pedestals.
I'm in favor of bringing this team back down to earth, and that requires letting them know there are no free passes. I don't care about how well we've done in the past: my only concern is with the present and the future. If you focus on how good you once were you lose sight of what it takes to be a perennial titan. And that's what USC has been doing.
I understand your sentiments Defender, and I really admire all the cool heads (like frak, paragon, and DC) around here who can take what happened in stride. But I can't blame others who, like myself, feel like our team needs a kick in the ass, not some acquiescence or unmitigated support.
To keep cheering would just breed the same type of hubris that got us here in the first place.
by Class of 2007 on Oct 7, 2007 10:57 PM PDT reply actions
oh they need a kick in the ass all right
In the meantime, let's not tear ourselves apart over this. All I am saying, is give peace a chance. Can't we all get along*?
* I realized, when the video store a couple of blocks from my dorm was set on fire for the second time in less than 12 hours, that sometimes the answer is no. But this doesn't have to be one of those times.
With all due respect Class of 2007. . .
If you had a brother on this year's team, would you still be booing? I'd like to think ALL THOSE CATS out there are our brothers. Brothers who've dislocated their shoulders, torn kneecaps, obtained hernias, screwed up their ankles. . . all for YOUR HAPPINESS. All for yours?
You can be sincere in thinking that "booing" your team is gonna change the way the game is played, or some play that's called, or some player that's involved in the game. . .and if you sincerely believe that. . .you'd also have to agree that you CAN BE SINCERELY WRONG. No?
by tapoutstylist on Oct 7, 2007 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions
OK lets get this straight
2 National Championships
3 Heismans
5 straight PAC-10 titles
5-1 against UCLA
5-1 against Notre Dame
If you guys want to boo the coaching staff and the team that accomplished all of that, then I think you're nuts. Remember that we still have some players on the team from 2003 and 2004. I hope you are all proud of yourselves for booing them. I feel really strongly on this. If you boo the team that brought all of this to us, then you should stay at home. Booing is lame.
6-6?
I agree
In re: would I boo my own brother, I guess my answer would be yes. I played soccer for a very long time as a youth, and made my high school football team as a freshman. My parents saw most of my practices and games, and when I messed up they chewed me out. Growing up I never got pats on the back for trying my hardest; when I brought trophies and straight A's home my parents just expected that of me. Maybe that's why I'm such an a**hole? :-/
I think everyone is missing the point I'm trying to make here. It's not like I'm advocating booing because a team lost. In the past, when USC would lose game I immediately would huddle up with my classmates and express how lucky we are to be students in this era. I didn't boo at the rose bowl when we lost to UCLA and I certainly wouldn't have booed the Oregon State loss. The reason I feel differently about the Stanford game is because I feel as though the coaching staff and the players let the fans down by not giving a complete effort. I don't care how many championships you've won, if you play half-assed you deserve to be admonished.
The reason why those kids on the practice field tore their ACL's or dislocated their knees is because they were giving it their best shot. In contrast, their coaches and teammates paid them back by trying not to break a sweat.
That's shameful, and deserves to be booed.
I still get the feeling that people are looking to our past and thinking, "Wow, how could anyone be so obtuse as to demean the success of this team? What type of imbecile could be that spoiled?"
I completely understand what you're saying. And like I said, I may be wrong about this. But, all I'm trying to say is that success doesn't let mediocrity off the hook. The reason we got to this spoiled position in the first place is because guys didn't take plays off and the coaches gave 110% on any given Saturday. That's not the case anymore, and that doesn't deserve our respect.
If I wanted to dwell on the fruits of yesteryear and stop holding my team accountable for mistakes I would have gone to Miami. But I didn't. I graduated from USC.
My parents and I paid that school 40k a year for a piece of paper and an experience. I woke up at 2am just to march to the corner of Fig and MLK and decapitate a paper-mache bruin live on ESPN. I spent all the money I earned working in the fine arts library just to get a hotel room for a weekender. I've canceled dates, gotten into fights, and sacrificed my GPA for Trojan football.
I am not a bandwagoner.
by Class of 2007 on Oct 8, 2007 1:09 AM PDT reply actions
point made
When the players are pros, I think booing is fair and even necessary when they don't try. What I saw in your loss to Stanford was no lack of effort on the player's parts, but a lot of errors, some of which seemed more mental (party attirbutable to coaching), but all of which I think are more forgiveable considering the number of second and third-stringers currently playing. SuperBruin Man made a very good point in another thread when he pointed out that although USC has stocked up at WR (and of course the logic applies to other positions as well) with top recruits, there is never a guarantee that these guys will be as good as the studs USC has fielded before, and right now it looks as if they haven't mesaured up to expectations. And don't forget that despite the turnovers and failures, USC did have more yards of offense and was still in position to stop Stanford. Give some credit to Stanford, too-they are not the doormat of the past three seasons. They played hard all game and emotion matters.
You guys will be relevant in the end and I still think USC has a shot at the Rose BOwl and possibly the BCS championship if it can get healthy and get past this loss.
While we're at it...
Much as I've enjoyed the Dorrell era, he's got to go. Leaving a walk-on QB to get torn apart by Notre Dame (!) while you've got a former QB currently playing WR and not taking any snaps? When you're down one QB already and the other one is injury prone?
That's just absurd. I don't really want UCLA to be good enough to cause problems for SC year in and year out, but I think - despite the claims that the Bruins could still win the Pac - Dorrell may just have bottomed out.
Fight On C of '07!
If you're man enough to think you might be wrong, you're man enough for me to at least offer kudos- as much I might disagree with you.
Fight On!
by tapoutstylist on Oct 8, 2007 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions
Methods may be different...
In any case, it's less than a week until we see how the Trojans respond. I bet practice will be interesting today.
Maybe the difference
by Blackdog81 on Oct 8, 2007 5:19 AM PDT reply actions
It's just a difference of opinion
I'm just scared of falling into mediocrity by giving our program a long leash. That's really all I'm saying. Unfortunately, I can't have any effect on the game on the field. And there's very little chance that the coaching staff would take any of my grumblings seriously. All I can do is announce my distaste. It worked for the Schalke fans :-/
I don't blame anyone for shi--ing on me. That's fine. I'm just a young Trojan, I don't know what it was like to not go to a BCS game every year. I just know what my father (and coaches) always told me: that the only way to stay the best is to hold yourself to a higher standard.
I didn't boo the basketball team for losing to ASU when they clearly mailed in the game; I also wouldn't boo if our team lost a hard-fought game. I just feel like this team is expected to play hard and play smart. Why else would they win so much?
In the end we all want the same thing here. SC has to pull itself up by the bootstraps and win this season out. Things were low after the Oregon State game last season, maybe we'll see the same thing this year.
I'll get back to ducking for cover now.
by Class of 2007 on Oct 8, 2007 7:53 AM PDT reply actions
IM sorry 2007, but you're nuts
USC is playing so far above the norm for college football right now, you have no idea. The above list I wrote above dwarfs the accomplishments of any other Trojan coach over a 5 season span. You need to seriously re-evaluate your expectations, because they aren't realistic. If you remember Matt Leinart had close wins against Cal, ucla, ASU, and Stanford. Any of those games, especially Cal, could have easily gone the other way.
Personally, I take offense at this comment:
"In contrast, their coaches and teammates paid them back by trying not to break a sweat."
If you are trying to say that the non-injured players on USC's roster weren't trying to win, then thats an insult to them, and the coaching staff. If thats what you think of the team and coaching staff, you really don't deserve them. If thats who you are, you are a bandwagoneer.
guys...
no need to get bent out of shape as to how we respectively feel about the team.
the one thing that has bonded us is our support for this team. Are their problems here? you bet, but lets not question each others motives in how we root for this team as we all see it differently. we all want the same thing...wins!
Lets try to focus on that.
wow
"You're young and dumb. You don't know how bad things used to be here. Just shut up and move on. This team deserves your respect."
First, the standard I'm holding this team to isn't unreasonable. If they had lost to Cal or Oregon we wouldn't be in this situation. Like I said, losing a tough game where your opponent outplays you (vis-a-vis ucla) is certainly acceptable. I never said SC should win every game, but that they shouldn't take games off. You want to tell me that they didn't take this game off? Fine, you're entitled to that argument. But I think you're wrong. I've never questioned whether the coaches and players have played hard until Saturday. If USC was 2-10 and at the bottom of the Pac-10 I would have booed on Saturday. The success issue is not salient to this specific argument.
I am implying that the coaches and players didn't try their best to win. Are you going to tell me that our team was outplayed? Seriously, make that argument, I'm very interested. Those turnovers and improbable 4th downs didn't convert themselves.
If it makes you feel better to continue to attack my reasonableness then go ahead.
Also, please don't tell me what I do and don't "deserve." I'm an alum. I chose to USC over other "prestigious" colleges because I've always wanted to be a Trojan, even when they weren't winning BCS games. I'm just as entitled to their success as you are.
Don't give me homilies from your high horse and think that you're a better alumnus because of your unwavering support. It doesn't make you seem reasonable and steadfast. It just make you look bitter.
by Class of 2007 on Oct 8, 2007 9:03 AM PDT reply actions
Respectfully, but totally, disagree
- In an earlier post you mentioned friends who made fun of you and made you feel ashamed after USC losses and/or poor play. Exactly which cfb program do they represent? Next time they rib you, ask them to provide you with their team's record in the past 5-6 years (or even in the past 2-3), then smirk at their silence.
- Unless you're prescient, you cannot possibly know what is going on in the heads of the coaches and players (i.e., they're arrogant, believe the press hype, aren't even trying, etc.). Calling them out for being lazy or indifferent or slacking is all presumption on your part. Sorry, I refuse to believe that you (or your parents) personally are more invested in the success of the program than the team and its coaches are. Question decisions, suggest possible ways to improve or alternatives, fine, but blanket condemnation of effort and motives goes beyond the pale.
P.S. We're #7 in the BCS now. If USC wins out and makes its way back to the top of the rankings by the end of the year, should we assume you'll be back cheering them on? If so, that seems like the definition of a bandwagon/fair weather fan to me.
Nice post def
COVERED BY TALENT
by PACTENGURU on Oct 8, 2007 9:23 AM PDT reply actions
let's be clear
If you think that I'm saying that I'm a better fan than you because of my tenure then you're reading it wrong. I was trying to illustrate that you have no realistic impression just how good your team is because you have only seen success. I am not bitter, and I don't think you are a bad person, I just think your expectations are abnormally too high, and that you're nuts for booing your team. That is all you should read into this.
but that is what you're implying
In any case, it's clear that my opinions aren't getting any respect here. that's okay with me, I didn't write this treatise for the purpose of converting people into boo birds. I was just trying to defend myself. Apparently that makes me daft and shallow. Whatever. At least I've served as a locus for unity, even if it was because I was getting shot down.
All I want is for this team to succeed. I spend all day thinking about the program. It's been that way for me since high school. Being called a fair-weather-fan really seems unjust to me. In my mind I'm just being die-hard... I expect my team to win every game. Sorry for being such a horrible person.
You've all taken my feelings for a particular game and extrapolated from that that I must be hopping off the bandwagon. That's patently false, and is totally inconsistent with what I've been arguing. You'd think I was Scott Wolf or something.
In any case, I'm done arguing with my own kind. It's the last thing I want at this point.
If anyone wants to throw some more rocks at me I'm at ainjijia@usc.edu
(and as a side note to Defender: sorry, but I'm a bit of a stickler for stuff like this. "Prescient" refers to the ability the see into the future, or foresight. I'm not sure if that's the word you were looking for.)
by Class of 2007 on Oct 8, 2007 11:42 AM PDT reply actions
About the bandwagon
by Blackdog81 on Oct 8, 2007 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Context matters
I wasn't critical of your vaunted expectations for the team or the angst you felt after the loss; I share both. I was critical of the arrogance I feel is exhibited in your assumption that the team needs you (and your booing) to let them know they aren't playing well. I would be more understanding of your perspective if you had been perennially let down by your team (insert appropriate university/pro team here) and needed to vent frustration because you felt the situation was both unchanging and unacknowledged. Given USC's recent record, that is simply not the case here.
In terms of labeling you based on one game, my criticism was directed at your (admitted) choice of action at the Coliseum Saturday and your OP here, in which you stated that you were walking away from the team. I simply rejected those choices as either appropriate for the situation or supportive in any way/shape/form. The attempt to rationalize booing your own team after one bad loss as proof of the intensity of your passion doesn't work for me. I would assume that's not the feeling the players on the sideline get from it, either, but I won't claim to know what they're thinking.
If cheering on a team that's winning and then booing the same team as soon as they lose isn't a textbook example of being a fairweather fan, I'm ready to be enlightened. BTW, people disagreeing with you here doesn't mean disrespecting you. You made your OP and then added a diary defending your comments; people responded to that.
I never said you were
Class, you made some pretty strong statements. If you were expecting a less than strong response to your opinions then I don't know what to tell you.
I never said this:
"You're young and dumb. You don't know how bad things used to be here. Just shut up and move on. This team deserves your respect."
I also never claimed to be better than anyone else. I did claim that you probably lacked perspective, and you might do well to consider that.
You bring up the question asking if I think that I am a better fan than you are. Well, being a better fan than someone isn't on my top ten list of how I want to live my life but if you really want to know if I think I'm a better fan than you, then I guess I'll tell you.
A good fan doesnt boo an amateur athlete during a game. Especially not a team that has delivered accolades and success consistently for years.
A good fan doesn't say the things you said about the team not trying hard, not breaking a sweat, etc..
These are my opinions, and you can take them or leave them. I really respect you for putting yourself out there, and saying what is on your mind. But when you fire torpedoes like you did, you have to expect a shot or two right back at you.
I'm done with this as of now, I only wrote this because you specifically addressed me at the beginning of your post.
So that said.
Fight ON!!
Beat the Wildcats
In Defence of 2007
I undertand that people feel passionatly about the booing issue, but we need to put it into context. If you do not love USC and are just at the Coli to eat bad hot dogs and see an event then you have no business booing. If you are an alum, and die hard fan you have earned the right to express yourself as you see fit. Don't jump on 2007 for hinting that he had given up. I have given up on USC Football many times. Often after a performance like last week. Yet there I am the next week in my Chris Claibourne jersey screaming myself hoarse. It does not matter if its Frank Strong fumbling after every touch, Mike Van Raaphorst rolling around like a Brazilian Soccer Player after a sack, or JDB blithly tossing pick after pick, bad play hurts. I have seen 2 responces to this, Blind Faith and Anger. Neither is wrong, and both have thier costs. The "fans" who are wrong are those who will not show up for Arizona. We cannot turn on each other, that's what Bruins do.
Just curious
Exactly
Fans cheer. Fans boo. That's what fans do. When you cheer, you're saying, "Great job guys, keep up the good work." When you boo, you're "saying" the opposite. Nothing personal, just tellin' it like it is.
You lose to a college football team that may be -- may be -- one of the worst in recent memory, you deserve to get booed. That's just the way it is. You want to take it personally, that's on you. But I know several players on this year's team, and not one of 'em would say they didn't deserve to get booed.
So get off your soapbox and deal with it. I've been an SC fan since '72, and the performance Saturday was putrid. Awful. Inexcusable. I don't hate the kids, think they're failures, or imply their "lives are over." But that doesn't change the fact, that Saturday was a joke.
And I don't care if you haven't lost a game in 10 years, losing to Stanford would still be just as inexcusable. So stop bringing up our record as some sort of salve for dropping a game to one of the worst teams in sports -- at any level!
by AnthonyDavis on Oct 8, 2007 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions
You can do what you want AD
If you want to look at the Stanford game as an individual contest, yes it was a horrendous display of football on our part. It however doesn't define the Trojan's season for me.
That said, nothing I say will make those who want to boo the team stop, but that's not going to stop me from thinking that its a counterproductive practice that ultimately does no good at all.
I also post on
I happen to have three different responses. . .
- "blind faith" is a redundant statement, as all "faith" is blind. now "blind loyalty"- that's syntactically correct, despite the historical use of blind faith as an idiomatic expression.
- blind loyalty and anger are not mutually exclusive in responding to the stress of USC's loss to Stanford
I don't have any faith or loyalty to John David Booty's ability to lead this team. Not in the next game, next month, nor barely-within-our-grasp National Championship game.
I am pretty angry at the loss to Stanford, but not completely because it didn't come against Notre Dame or UCLA.
As a fan, I want many things to happen. All of which stem from the same stress that's involved in losing to Stanford. Not putting the hammer down on Idaho and barely escaping against Washington??? I can go on with my anger over some called plays, dropped balls, and lack of effort- but . . . see my JDB response. It rests on his shoulders. He's the QB/Heisman-hope. He has to suffer our anger when they lose because he rode our happiness and took the bulk of the credit when they won.
Boo? Yeah, go ahead.
Give up on the team? Sure, whatever blows your skirt up.
Anyone can be hyper-critical or be immature in their response to the loss.
But here on CC, you'll have to suffer through a whole host of highly opinionated replies.
Ain't no one hatin'. But you gotta "back it" up, because people will "smack your sh_t" up.
(btw: ilium- i agree with you on letting people respond with how they respond. it's neither here nor there, we're all filled-up with Trojan pride. some more so than others. it's just that no one's above or below reproach)
by tapoutstylist on Oct 8, 2007 5:09 PM PDT reply actions
Yeah its a free country
I personally agree with everything you said on JDB. To me its not a question of "is he the guy," its a question of "who else do we have?" Sanchez is the likely candidate, but even he has been prone to interceptions. I really don't know if Sanchez is the answer, but my gut feeling is that Booty is the best that we have.
As far as the jeering goes, everyone should know what I think on that subject by now.
I hope JDB makes me eat crow . . .
Guys, I wanted so badly for him to be great this year. To watch and be proud of "The Native Son Going Back Louisiana" to bring a championship back to Troy? I ate that up like it was going out of style. I want that back. Not sure if it's gonna happen anymore.
by tapoutstylist on Oct 8, 2007 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I want the QB who is best for the team
The issue I have with the approach some people advocate is that the problems this team is having go beyond one person, imo. So what happens if Sanchez comes in and the o-line still is wobbly and the receivers still drop passes and Sanchez also throws interceptions (which he, too, has done this year)? Oops, maybe JDB isn't the anti-Christ after all? Then the chicken littles in the fan base run around screaming about something else to quick-fix the problem?
I'm all for thinking outside the box and reviewing fundamentals and doing whatever we need to do to get back on sound footing for next week's game. I just don't go for the knee-jerk reactions that assume the coaches don't know anything about what they're doing. Of course, thinking you know better than the people paid to do the job is one of the pleasures of being a fan, I suppose.
Bottom line: I want what's best for the team and I'm willing to let Pete Carroll work through that at this point.
That is the question
Too true ilium. . .
Is it gonna be a "what have you done for me lately?" situation (like I have judged Booty this entire year)? I don't think that would be fair to Mark because in PC's system, you have to "grow" within it. But I'll tell you one thing, we'll have more options in the playbook with Sanchez in. He has ridiculous mobility, a bionic arm, and great reads. His interceptions (I'm goin' out on a limb here, I know it) I think have been a product of "WANTING TO SHINE" much too soon with the in-game reps he's been given. He's a SoCal guy. He knows how fast legends grow, how much we (as a collective culture here in LaLaLand) eat up and love devouring our "superheroes and celebrities". Face it, we're a fast-food culture to the 10th power. (i'm not proud of it, but it is what it is- the rest of America sees it and knows it)
With that said, here's is the commentary from Trojan NYC's blog:
"Anyone that followed Mark's career at MVHS knows that the standout quality in this kid is his leadership and confidence. I remember watching the '05 Cali-Florida game and marveling at Mark's cool demeanor and ability to take command of the offense. He made quick assertive calls in the huddle and walked up and down the sideline encouraging teammates and going over plays with his receivers. That is the type of leader we need in this offense, a player that can bring confidence to a young WR corp and injured O-Line and at times carry them on his back.
What is the risk of starting Mark? We have the biggest cushion of any school in the nation (minus LSU) in our defense; if any school can start a new QB mid-season it is USC. To say that starting JDB with a struggling O-Line is significantly less risky is completely baseless to me when you consider UCLA, Washington, and Stanford; compound that with the fact that Oregon, Cal, and ASU are all away and they all see some blood. With Arizona and Notre Dame next on the schedule, THIS is the time to make a change."
Once JDB's finger has improved, and as spn (i think:?) wrote- JDB has had some time to reflect on his play and that of the offense (i'm going on memory, this is just the "gist" of what i remember spn writing)- then yeah- put him back in and give him all the chance in the world to prove his naysayers wrong.
The thing is, this type of "knee-jerking" or replacing position players can be done at the college level. The performance of teams has been quite a hayride, especially this year. To a large extent (without getting into minutia) the college game is amateurism at the highest level. There is no variable of of $$$$ for individual players, their future draft selection notwithstanding. At the pro-level, it's a different set of variables altogether for obvious reasons. Tavita and Mark will have some common comparisons if Mark is put in to start. (we haven't even begun to dwell on his play this past Sat. he showed-up, no?)
I hate that people are now lumping USC with Michigan for very similar reasons (losses, not personnel) this year. My pride's intact, my hangover still subsists.
I, too, want what's best for the team. My faith in BigBallsPete in unyielding. Even if he elects to start Booty this Sat. Do I want Sanchez instead? HELL YEAH! Will I be bummed if he doesn't get the start. HELL NO!
(prediction this Sat vs. Arizona: a complete blowout whoever starts at QB, the Wildcats got nothing coming. we're gonna murder 'em)
by tapoutstylist on Oct 9, 2007 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions
What you said about Sanchez I agree with
I think the comparison with michigan comes not from losses but expectations. Michigan thought they would contend for a championship and were exposed. We thought we would contend for a championship and were exposed. That being said on a neutral field I would take USC. We have a much better Defense. Although Hart is better than Washington (maybe not Johnson or Gable), Manningham is better than anyone we have, and Henne and Booty might have been separated at birth.
crow will not be served
by PACTENGURU on Oct 8, 2007 8:09 PM PDT reply actions
fans
by PACTENGURU on Oct 8, 2007 8:14 PM PDT reply actions
great win
by PACTENGURU on Oct 8, 2007 11:29 PM PDT reply actions

by 





