Conquest Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

Lawsuit Filed

No surprise here. Lloyd Lake filed his lawsuit against Reggie Bush in a San Diego Court yesterday.

A civil lawsuit filed Tuesday afternoon by Lloyd Lake alleges that Bush and his family accepted more than $291,600 over the course of roughly a year.

Lake's attorney, Brian Watkins, said his client is scheduled to discuss the matter with NCAA investigators Friday. NCAA rules prohibit extra benefits for athletes.

According to the suit, Bush, his stepfather, LaMar Griffin, and mother, Denise Griffin, began asking for money starting in November 2004 when they claimed to have "fallen on hard times financially and required immediate and significant financial assistance to support their respective lifestyles."

That money allegedly included about $13,000 that Bush used to purchase a 1996 Chevrolet Impala registered in his name, Watkins said. The suit also alleges that the defendants "promised repayment of monies lent and advanced" and that on Jan. 14, 2006, Bush "reaffirmed his commitment to repay Plaintiff in a written communication" but never did.

Lake will also be meeting with the NCAA on Friday. Good, lets get it all out there so we can put this mess to bed. Most ration USC fans would agree that Reggie took the money; the bigger issue is SC's culpability in this mess. Hard to say, again to most rational individuals there is a wide gap between knowing and should have known but we are dealing with the NCAA and they are clearly not the most rational group out there. To them there is no difference. This didn't happen in SC's back yard it happened in San Diego where I don't think anyone was looking to dig up this sort of infraction.

At this point, at least to me, I am not worried if USC/Bush loses wins, titles or awards. In my eyes Reggie's family's actions have embarrassed SC enough that the wins, titles and awards are tainted, so to me they are worthless. That is not to say that it won't erase the memories of what I saw because many other players who towed the line shouldn't be lumped into this mess because of the actions of one person.

While I know the answer to this question it needs to be thrown out there. Do the parents of a potential NFL star have the right to enter a business agreement with a party or parties based on the future potential/performance of their child? The easy and obvious answer is no, at least in the eyes of the NCAA. But if the parents do it without the knowledge of the player what is the player to do? More interesting, and this plays on the heart strings of decent people, if the parents enter into this type of arrangement do those of us not a part of it actually believe that Reggie would turn his parents in. We all love our parents and would anything to protect them even if we know what they are doing is wrong.  This is not murder, drunk driving or any other hideous crime that we hear about in the news. This is a couple of parents trying to cash in on their sons stardom after years of struggling financially. I don't think its right and I have said in the past that they could have waited but none of us have ever walked a day in those shoes.

The other angle is the extortion angle. Did lake and Michaels attempt to extort the Bush family in any way shape or form? Lake and Michaels have some checkered pasts and their attempt to sign Bush was probably a chance to make themselves look legitimate but when things started going south did they fall back into their own ways? I don't know but their past opens them up to some serious scrutiny.

The one thing that I have trouble with is the potential privacy issue that is attached to this mess. How far should an institution go at monitoring the parents or relatives of their players? I'm not concerned about the privacy of Bush's parents; they lost that right privacy when they broke the rules; which has now jeopardized the welfare of a solid football program.

But the bigger question is should USC have known? That is the issue that will be central to their investigation. Like I said earlier it is a big leap between knowing and should have known but I'm not sure if I would be happy if the school started checking up on the financial behaviors of the parents for the sake of compliance. I am NOT suggesting that the NCAA, should Bush's actions expose wrong doing without SC knowing about it, should force USC to monitor parents behavior but it is also not too far of a stretch. I personally think that that would be impossible and I can think of no school that would endorse it nor have the resources let alone the will to do it.

But it is easy to see how some would demand that sort of solution to attempt to keep players within the rules of compliance. Any attempt to monitor the families of players to ensure enforcement of the rules invades the privacy of those who walk the straight and narrow. As a parent of 2 kids in college is it not enough that my financial records can be looked at to assess that their tuition can be paid? And while my kids are not athletes, if they were I am not trusting enough of those institutions to protect any other information they dig up or continue to have my life looked at for the sake of a players or programs eligibility. The line has to be drawn somewhere.

I deal with privacy issues everyday. A patients privacy is more sacred than anything else I know, as they literally put their life into another's hands and the choices they make on their care or how they seek or pay for that care is deeply personal. When we start delving into the private lives of the families of players I think we start to find things out that are not important to the situation and once some outsider has that information who knows where it can go.

To me the issue is now more about protecting those that follow the rules than it is about protecting titles and awards. Every family has its fair share of checkered pasts. If I get a new Mercedes S Class it is none of the NCAA's business how I paid for it. If I didn't break any of the NCAA's rules in getting that car then it's none of their damn business. But if in their attempt to ascertain if my purchase of the vehicle was legit they find out that I like to bet the ponies, maybe though a bookie, does that now single me out that I could be manipulated if I fall behind in repaying my losses? Does that mean because I may associate myself with shady characters that I am breaking some compliance rules with the NCAA. It may be bad judgment and it may even be against he law but it has nothing to do with the NCAA and their knowledge of it to me would be a severe invasion of my privacy.

Think it's far fetched? You are fooling yourself if you do.

I am not looking to make excuses for Bush or is family, I have made my thoughts known on this going all the back to my old site. But in the NCAA's future attempt to try and combat this type behavior I am just not comfortable having the schools compliance officials or the NCAA sniff around a family's personal life to ensure compliance. In the absence of any evidence that USC knew of these allegations it is entirely possible that NCAA could do just that in order to keep this type of situation ever happening again.

And for those who think it's no big deal wait until it happens to you.

0 recs  |  Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Conquest Chronicles

Under Pressure

Jul 2008 by Paragon SC - 1 comment

Katz on Mayo

May 2008 by Paragon SC - 0 comments

The Nagging Question

May 2008 by Paragon SC - 1 comment

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

From what I gather
The only contact SC had with New Era was that Lake and Michaels were allowed in the locker room after a game.  I have no idea how many times they were allowed in.  My father was a team doctor, and I have personally been escorted into the USC locker room, and gym without an invitation on numerous occasions to meet players and coaches.  The question of agents congregating at Heritage Hall is a sticky issue.  On one hand if you give them access, you have to trust that they won't put players and families in positions to jepordize their eligibility.  On the other hand, most agents probably don't care about NCAA rules if it means landing a monster client.  I don't see how coach Carroll has anything to gain by letting agents anywhere near his team.  I don't believe that USC should have known about the dealings between the Bushs and New Era.  I only hope that the NCAA sees it the same way.

by frak on Oct 31, 2007 9:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Reggie needs to be a man
and make this go away with a settlement. He needs to stop listening to the advice of overly aggressive fee generating lawyers and salvage his reputation, and that of his university by settling the matter. If he does not, and USC suffers penalties, his heisman should be removed from heritige hall and he should never be spoken of again. The real world is often ugly, all you can do is fight like heck to preserve what you have earned, sometimes the best way to fight is to make smart strategic choices.

by ilium55 on Nov 1, 2007 9:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think I read that they blew the settlement
For whatever reason, Bush's lawyers weren't able to get an agreement with this joker to be quiet and go away. Unless Lake's lawyers have a keen sense of escalation / brinksmanship, I suspect that Bush has missed his chance to sweep this under the rug.

by DC Trojan on Nov 1, 2007 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
but even Lakes shady lawyers must know that taking a case to trial, and winning it against a vastly better funded opponent is difficult. Plus the second Lake talks to the NCAA bush has zero incentive to settle. That being said, the blame is on Bush -- crooks are crooks, they will try to heist you for money and relying on thier discretion is a folly, he should have taken a less aggressive stance and settled the matter for everyones sake.

by ilium55 on Nov 1, 2007 9:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

do you know
i heard that bushs brillant money grubing family actaully wrote thier names in the sidewalk of the so called rental house is that true

by PACTENGURU on Nov 1, 2007 8:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I can see how that could be taken
but my family rented until well after I was in high school, and we wrote our names in cement on more than one occasion.

In our case, at least, it didn't mean anything more than that we found some wet cement.

by Boy Howdy on Nov 3, 2007 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

er, to clarify
cement in the front of our house, that is (once for the driveway, once for the sidewalk)

by Boy Howdy on Nov 3, 2007 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Conquest Chronicles the SB Nation blog about the USC Trojans.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Trojans »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
2010 USC Baseball Season Preview

Recent FanPosts

Pk1_001_small
Ucla FB and the Clippers
Untitled_small
David Sills' recruitment: The joke is on bRuins
Galloping_horses_small
From the Helicopter Pilot
Jackburton_small
Kiffin gets a head start on his 2015 class
Spqr_small
Top Questions For USC Coaches From UCLA Type Players
Jk_small
Non-Revenue Sports Coverage
4759_114276103488_551713488_1998274_134838_n_small
Great Read On Seantrel
Pk1_001_small
Looks like Trojan Mens Tennis team is starting off season with a bang!
Pumpkingatwedding_small
Recruiting Definitions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

4759_114276103488_551713488_1998274_134838_n_small Paragon SC

Avatar2_small DC Trojan

Official Partner of CBS Sports